1/6 is too slow for human movement, maybe at 1/80 which is really pushing it, with 1/125 being the threshold, while your shot does look handheld. Having your iso at 1600 means you could've boosted it to 3200 or 6400 and fix any noise in post. Your image would look less murky overall, unless that's the look you're going for, in which case, get it monochromed. Framewise, wooden structure provides an interesting frame in frame situation, and your crop further intensifies it, and I like weird, unorthodox crops.
cheers
Patrick
Thanks for your unsolicited criticism and advice.....
The photo was taken at a concert, where a photographer in the crowd has no control over lighting, background or anything else, though I was free to move around quite a bit.
Being of modest means, do what I can with what I can afford. I have a $500 camera and used iPhoto then (and now Photos) for editing, and quite a bit of experimentation to see what can be done.
I'm aware that 1/6 second is "too slow" for movement, but it was the speed that the camera selected when I set ISO 1600 under quite difficult lighting, mostly coming from behind the subject. However, by observing the subject's movements first then anticipating the moment it can be done. The hands are moving, but the head and face are momentarily still. It is enough. It is a technique I use quite a bit.
Yes, it is handheld, but with body and elbows supported on whatever is handy. Again something I do quite a bit. Using a tripod is impractical for most situations where I take photos.
ISO 1600 is the highest I can go to with the Fujifilm X20 before there is significant noise. At ISO 2500 there is usually too much noise, but sometimes it does yield a useful shot.
This "Photo Of The Day" is a fun forum is used by folks with a variety of photographic interests, equipment and skills. Perhaps instead of offering criticism and advice, you might be better to experiment a bit and be prepared to try being a bit less than orthodox in your approach to taking snapshots.
Last edited: