Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

CK Williams

macrumors 6502a
Dec 27, 2008
844
15,578
Las Vegas
DSC_0033 copy.JPG


Sunbathing or relaxing in the shade
 

decafjava

macrumors 603
Feb 7, 2011
5,514
8,028
Geneva
The rear ones are. I'm fine with the others. Its not usually that sunny in the UK!
I was going to call it a photoshop for that reason (sunshine). ? Seriously nice photo worthy of a car dealership and the car not only looks nice must be a pleasure to drive!
 

tizeye

macrumors 68040
Jul 17, 2013
3,241
35,935
Orlando, FL
Follow-up photo from yesterday. "Pixel peeking" raising to 81% (100% eliminated the leaf detail from the frame) in Photoshop. Been an interesting experiment with the 1926 vintage Kodak camera. Good news is that it works and no light leaks in bellows or elsewhere. Also interesting to be limited to 1/50 and 1/25 shutter speeds (loaded ISO 400 film for that reason alone) and guessing at the aperture with numbered opening 1, 2, 3, and 4. and guessing the distance up to 100 ft plus infinity on the scale. The real issue as shown in the photo is the limitation of the 100 year old glass as there is no detail in the leaves, straight lines or elsewhere in the photo that even the huge 6mmx9mm negative (8 shots on a roll of 120) could compensate for. Probably the last roll I will run through it...unless have a novelty event sometime that could take beyond a conversational prop. It does get me thinking about medium format 120 film though. While the 6/7's are heavy and bulky, have you seen how the prices have dropped on the 6/6 Hasselblad's and Bronica's, or the even cheaper "entry" 645 Mamiya and Pentax? TEMPTING!

IMG_0607.jpg
 

mollyc

macrumors G3
Aug 18, 2016
8,065
50,739
Follow-up photo from yesterday. "Pixel peeking" raising to 81% (100% eliminated the leaf detail from the frame) in Photoshop. Been an interesting experiment with the 1926 vintage Kodak camera. Good news is that it works and no light leaks in bellows or elsewhere. Also interesting to be limited to 1/50 and 1/25 shutter speeds (loaded ISO 400 film for that reason alone) and guessing at the aperture with numbered opening 1, 2, 3, and 4. and guessing the distance up to 100 ft plus infinity on the scale. The real issue as shown in the photo is the limitation of the 100 year old glass as there is no detail in the leaves, straight lines or elsewhere in the photo that even the huge 6mmx9mm negative (8 shots on a roll of 120) could compensate for. Probably the last roll I will run through it...unless have a novelty event sometime that could take beyond a conversational prop. It does get me thinking about medium format 120 film though. While the 6/7's are heavy and bulky, have you seen how the prices have dropped on the 6/6 Hasselblad's and Bronica's, or the even cheaper "entry" 645 Mamiya and Pentax? TEMPTING!

View attachment 2013281
where are you finding tempting mamiyas or pentaxes in terms of price??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Apple fanboy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.