Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

erayser

macrumors 65816
Apr 9, 2011
1,267
1,232
San Diego
Found this Canon AE-1 at my mom's house. Any recommendation on film for portrait shoots? Is it worth the extra money for Portra or Ektar film?

Just in case... camera was not Photoshop'd into the picture. Camera was shot with this backdrop while mounted on lighting stand. I just masked the stand out of the picture with Photoshop.

CanonAE1wm.jpg
 

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
57,002
56,024
Behind the Lens, UK
Almost ready to open up into a beautiful flower:

View attachment 828073
Beautiful.
[doublepost=1553458507][/doublepost]
Ardwell shore at it's unpredictable, moody best - SW Scotland. This was taken on 5th May 2018.

Fuji X-T2 with XF 16-55mm f2.8 lens using LEE Filters 0.6 Neutral Density hard graduated filter and Hitech Firecrest 0.9 ND solid filter (I think).
1.5s / f8 / ISO 200

View attachment 828074
Stunning. I must visit Scotland soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark0

mollyc

macrumors G3
Aug 18, 2016
8,065
50,760
What is "freelensing"? That's a term (or technique?) unfamiliar to me. Sorry if this sounds rude, but is the entire subject meant to be OOF?
Freelensing is when the lens is off camera. You can get light leaks and other interesting effects. You do typically get more blur because you can angle the lens away from the sensor.

I’m not particularly good at it, and the lens I was using today (Lensbaby Velvet 56) is a blurry/glowy lens even when attached. The yellow of this image makes it harder to see, but the pointy tip of the daff in the middle actually is sharp. But monochrome and web resized, etc., make it seem OOF. I had better luck when I used my 85mm since it’s not a specialty lens and sharper throughout.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/amp/content/how-freelensing
 

Clix Pix

macrumors Core
Ah, thanks for the explanation, Molly! This must be a fairly new technique -- first I've heard of it, anyway. Interesting idea..... Yeah, I would think that if it is likely that the subject, or at least some of it, is going to be blurred by using this kind of process, then it might be better to use a normal lens with it as opposed to a specialty lens which already creates blur anyway, so that at least it is more readily apparent to the viewer that at least something is in focus. I did see that the pointy tip of the daffodil is indeed in focus, but just a tiny bit of it....easy to miss! Of course it all depends, too, on the artist's intention when creating the image....

Somewhere in the other room in a bag or drawer I've got a Lensbaby that I bought some years ago -- don't recall the name of it now -- and tried a few times but never had much success with it and didn't care for the results so finally just stuck it away.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.