Ah, thanks for the explanation, Molly! This must be a fairly new technique -- first I've heard of it, anyway. Interesting idea..... Yeah, I would think that if it is likely that the subject, or at least some of it, is going to be blurred by using this kind of process, then it might be better to use a normal lens with it as opposed to a specialty lens which already creates blur anyway, so that at least it is more readily apparent to the viewer that at least something is in focus. I did see that the pointy tip of the daffodil is indeed in focus, but just a tiny bit of it....easy to miss! Of course it all depends, too, on the artist's intention when creating the image....
Somewhere in the other room in a bag or drawer I've got a Lensbaby that I bought some years ago -- don't recall the name of it now -- and tried a few times but never had much success with it and didn't care for the results so finally just stuck it away.
Yes of course a proper camera is better, but many people take exceptional phone camera images.I’ve done direct comparisons between iPhone and Sony mirrorless, taking the same exact photo with both. The real camera did exceptionally better, especially at night or low light.
I don't think it's a particularly new concept. In fact, newer, electronic lenses make it more difficult, if not impossible, to do since you need a lens where you can keep the aperture open when the lens is off camera. There are a lot of people who do amazing things while freelensing with the Velvet 56, but I've only tried a couple of times, so there's a big learning curve. I think most people use a cheapy 50mm and some even break them to keep the aperture open. My 85mm has an aperture ring but I only recently figured out how to unlock it.
I've been doing photography for many, many years (some years more intensely than others) and yet this is the first time I've heard of "freelensing". I've heard of and tried things such as swinging the camera or moving it up-and-down while making an exposure -- and other interesting ways to get a creative image, though. I can see how this "freelensing" thing would work better with older lenses that are less dependent on electronics. In the old days sometimes people reversed lenses, too, to achieve certain effects. I've got a few real oldies, maybe one day I'll experiment....
Yes of course a proper camera is better, but many people take exceptional phone camera images.
Also the point of this thread is to encourage sharing of any type of photography. No one should feel their gear is holding them back from sharing on this thread.
I have been trying to find the history of it. It's also called lens whacking, which I've never heard until today. I think it must have come about with the advent of digital cameras since there is no film to ruin with light leaks, but I have found references going back to 2010, so while new in the realm of all of photography, it isn't new from last year.
I had no idea, so I was interested to know also.
I like the iridescent look, even though they are probably just reflections.I don't think the picture did the subject justice. View attachment 828293
The lighting was stunning. Although I have some beautiful photos of the interior, they are nowhere near as stunning as the place itself. One of those images you just can’t quite capture. I guess some of it is atmosphere that you don’t get with a photo.I like the iridescent look, even though they are probably just reflections.
Nice. I nearly always regret getting those extension tubes out. I struggle with the narrow DoF but you’ve nailed it.This conversation that Molly and I've been having about "freelensing" / "lens whacking" and experimentation reminded me that one spring (spring of 2013, as it turns out) I had done some experimenting with "super-macro," with just a very narrow and shallow DOF. I did it by attaching one or two extension tubes on to one of my macro lenses to see what would happen..... After rummaging around in my Zenfolio gallery for a while I finally found one of the images I vaguely remembered, so here it is:
View attachment 828297
Pure joy! Even his shadow is smiling.