Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Darmok N Jalad

macrumors 603
Sep 26, 2017
5,425
48,334
Tanagra (not really)
P1000840.jpg
 

kallisti

macrumors 68000
Apr 22, 2003
1,751
6,670

I like the composition. However there are serious artifacts in the sky that ruin the pic for me. The tonal transitions aren't smooth--there are very obvious lines/bands in the sky. Not sure if it is a problem with the original file or an artifact from the small file posted here (though my suspicion is the former).

Smooth tonal transitions in the sky can be problematic for many cameras, ranging from phone cameras to higher-end cameras (for example Sony A7R2/3 cameras struggle with this even when shot in RAW (compressed--and thus lossy RAW. When will Sony come up with a lossless compressed RAW file?)). The problem is much worse when shooting JPEG (regardless of camera). Skies can have a massive tonal range (especially at dawn/dusk) that requires a good sensor and file type able to record the nuances captured by the sensor. Otherwise you will end up with very obvious artifacts that aren't easy to fix in post.

Additionally, artifacts can be introduced when sharing small JPEG versions of the files. Data is thrown out as part of the process of making the file smaller. Sometimes this doesn't impact the image in an obvious way. With skies, it can.
 

Antoni Nygaard

macrumors 6502a
Jun 23, 2009
802
895
Denmark
I like the composition. However there are serious artifacts in the sky that ruin the pic for me. The tonal transitions aren't smooth--there are very obvious lines/bands in the sky. Not sure if it is a problem with the original file or an artifact from the small file posted here (though my suspicion is the former).

Smooth tonal transitions in the sky can be problematic for many cameras, ranging from phone cameras to higher-end cameras (for example Sony A7R2/3 cameras struggle with this even when shot in RAW (compressed--and thus lossy RAW. When will Sony come up with a lossless compressed RAW file?)). The problem is much worse when shooting JPEG (regardless of camera). Skies can have a massive tonal range (especially at dawn/dusk) that requires a good sensor and file type able to record the nuances captured by the sensor. Otherwise you will end up with very obvious artifacts that aren't easy to fix in post.

Additionally, artifacts can be introduced when sharing small JPEG versions of the files. Data is thrown out as part of the process of making the file smaller. Sometimes this doesn't impact the image in an obvious way. With skies, it can.


It’s shot in the default iPhone app (HEIC format). The edited picture which I have posted here has slight more banding than the non edited. But it looks pronounced here than when I watch it on my screen. There was a little to be done with editing on this one without making the bad quality more obvious.

I wished that I brought my little d-Lux 7 on that evening trip.
 

tizeye

macrumors 68040
Jul 17, 2013
3,241
35,938
Orlando, FL
For the past 25 years this church has given Concert Series of 8 concerts free to the general public. Performing groups are professional or university level and vary from orchestra to strings or brass. Local photo club supports them with access throughout the church and a reserved chair in the center aisle which is where I took yesterday's photo of the hands at the piano.

St Lukes April 2016 - 2500px-25.jpg
 

mollyc

macrumors G3
Aug 18, 2016
8,065
50,758
I was mostly interested in the web, not so much the spider. This would be a big web if I had let him finish it; it spanned probably 15 feet from tree to house and I had to shoot up at him with my 100mm lens (and this image is cropped some), so quite high off the ground. But I broke the bottom free as I left, as I didn't want to accidentally walk through it later.


FB_September_03_2019_001.jpg
 

Darmok N Jalad

macrumors 603
Sep 26, 2017
5,425
48,334
Tanagra (not really)
I was mostly interested in the web, not so much the spider. This would be a big web if I had let him finish it; it spanned probably 15 feet from tree to house and I had to shoot up at him with my 100mm lens (and this image is cropped some), so quite high off the ground. But I broke the bottom free as I left, as I didn't want to accidentally walk through it later.


View attachment 855933
We have one building a big web outside my daughter’s window. The kids have enjoyed watching her spin the web in the evenings. We feel the spider chose a great spot, as we have two panes of glass between us and no way to get a face full of web. I’m sure the spider is happy to not have her work undone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mollyc

mollyc

macrumors G3
Aug 18, 2016
8,065
50,758
We have one building a big web outside my daughter’s window. The kids have enjoyed watching her spin the web in the evenings. We feel the spider chose a great spot, as we have two panes of glass between us and no way to get a face full of web. I’m sure the spider is happy to not have her work undone.
Well I didn't kill this spider, just tried to encourage him to move to a different spot. I think I sufficiently annoyed him with my spray bottle of water. :eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darmok N Jalad

Darmok N Jalad

macrumors 603
Sep 26, 2017
5,425
48,334
Tanagra (not really)
P1000847.jpg
A zinnia anomaly. For some reason this one thinks it's a sunflower and has turned sideways.


Well I didn't kill this spider, just tried to encourage him to move to a different spot. I think I sufficiently annoyed him with my spray bottle of water. :eek:
Oh, I know the feeling. I had an old job that had me walking through areas where I would frequently get a face-full of web. I used to take a stick and wave it up and down to clear my path as I walked. I'm sure anyone watching me thought I'd gone mad, but it kept me from getting a face full of web--it's an unpleasant experience!
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.