Honestly, MKBHD's "second impressions" video makes a good case for the 3 XL with the notch turned off via developer's settings, of course.
It somehow looks better than the 2 XL. Like, the bezels appear smaller all around by a bit, (the side bezels for sure, right?). It doesn't look quite like the super bloated bezels of the 2 XL.
Or am I crazy? I could be crazy.
Plus the improved screen panel should make it a better overall screen experience, too.
If you're going to turn off the notch, then why even have it to begin with? Every notch, I think, is a design flaw.
Honestly, MKBHD's "second impressions" video makes a good case for the 3 XL with the notch turned off via developer's settings, of course.
It somehow looks better than the 2 XL. Like, the bezels appear smaller all around by a bit, (the side bezels for sure, right?). It doesn't look quite like the super bloated bezels of the 2 XL.
Or am I crazy? I could be crazy.
Plus the improved screen panel should make it a better overall screen experience, too.
I’m not much of a fan of Unbox Therapy as I find Lew a bit overdramatic and his videos sometimes a bit too ‘click bait-y’ but his latest video is spot on in my opinion. He agrees with you @epicrayban and finds it perplexing why Google pushes everything down in the status bar when hiding the notch, instead of blacking out of the sides and using the space for status icons.
Skip to about the 1:50 mark to get past Lew’s usual excessively long setup rant.
[doublepost=1539311059][/doublepost]So out of curiosity it went and compared dimensions of the 2 XL and 3 XL. I didn’t realize they are very nearly the exact same size (0.1mm difference in length). So when the notch is disabled, resulting in roughly 6.0” of usable display, it is literally the exact same size display and overall dimensions of the 2 XL.
So what Google has basically done is just put out the 2 XL ver. 2.0 with improvements in 3 key areas—display quality, speaker quality, and wireless charging. It’s not the best overall design but I could get behind that. Now just move the status bar info back into the ‘ears’ when the cutout is hidden and it’ll be good to go.
Err why is there an option for a 'double cutout' that adds a notch to the bottom of the screen???
@ 5:16...
Also @ 4:58... He seems to emphasise how much screen you lose by disabling the notch in developer settings, which is reflective of the point I've made here - the deeper the notch, the more screen you'll lose by disabling it.
I'm all for taking the micky out of yourself, but this is next level from Google.Well, that's one way to double down on the notch.
I'm all for taking the micky out of yourself, but this is next level from Google.
. just disappointed because i really hoped that google could build a phone to rival apple, to provide competition. but no, i think pixel 3 is going to be another pixel 2.
If you're going to turn off the notch, then why even have it to begin with? Every notch, I think, is a design flaw.
I see no point in hiding it if I go with pixel xl3 id keep the notch on. Notches don't bother me now they did when the iPhone released and I was like alot of you guys omg the notch I cant handle looking at it, but it isn't end of the world id still happily use the pixel.
well, google could implement it such that notification icons, time, etc appears along side of the notch, i.e. like what many tech youtubers said. this makes better use of the real estate. also, watching some youtube videos, it seemed like the notch is fine usually, but could become an eyesore when you game or watch videos.
When should we start to see the reviews drop?
I can't quite grasp how people are saying the notch is now not an issue after being disgusted over it for the last 3 months lol.
But good if you can look past it.
Same as we did with the iPhone X!
I can't quite grasp how people are saying the notch is now not an issue after being disgusted over it for the last 3 months lol.
See it never really bothered me on the iPhone because there is no chin, and it made sense for FaceID. So there’s kinda a reason for it.
As with all Android phones so far though, there’s seemingly no reason other than the manufacturer thinking it’s the cool thing to do.
It could be. With the screen off and just going by the overall dimensions, the dimensions are off. Way to skinny. Just looks wrong.Probably because of the large bezels at the top and bottom.
Having pre-ordered the Pixel 3 XL after messing with it in a Verizon store (and having used the iPhone X for the last year), I honestly don't care about the notch. It is what it is, and it doesn't bother me. Obviously, they could have done a better job or eliminated it (as Apple could have), but I don't care. It's just a bridge between the old style large bezels and the new phones a year or two from now that will have full screens edge to edge.It's not that it's no longer an issue; people just don't have a choice if they want the larger screen/battery. Make no mistake, the 3 XL notch is still a design flaw, and the most egregious of them all.
For me personally, I only started considering the XL after the discovery of the developer's setting that eliminates the notch (pushing the status bar down) which results in a refined Pixel 2 XL look. The bezels appear less bloated.
IMO, that's what Google should have created in the first place. They would have avoided all the negative press and reaction to the notch. And along with the better quality screen and better speakers to help justify the forehead/chin, it would have, at most, been criticized for being a boring update.
Still not willing to pull the trigger on the XL. I want the 3, but having trouble pulling the trigger on that, too.
[doublepost=1539364314][/doublepost]
The Verge wrote an excellent article about the 3 XL notch and how everyone agrees the notch is a compromise in design, but you have to at least justify it as much as you can. And when it's as ugly as it is on the 3 XL, you need even more justification for it. The 3 XL fails miserably to justify it altogether.
For the record, I don't think even good technology justifies a notch. The good technology can still be there in a balanced, symmetrical bezel. Just that the article really nails Google for failing to justify any of it at all.