Gonna be 3-4 more weeks on the Crucial. It's worth the wait though.![]()
Amazon has it in stock right now.
Gonna be 3-4 more weeks on the Crucial. It's worth the wait though.![]()
Crucial is Micron. Crucial is just the branding for Micron's retail arm. ie. They make the actual RAM themselves. OWC is essentially noname brand. A good noname brand maybe, but not quite the same thing.Is Crucial considerably better than OWC? I have OWC memory in my current 2012 iMac.
Which one are you seeing in stock?Amazon has it in stock right now.
I'll have it this week actually. But, had to order another 16 as I didn't realise that i ordered 1 module of 16 and not two eights. So, going to have a total of 40GB instead.
Amazon has it in stock right now.
No. This is the correct Crucial RAM for the 2017. Not in stock. Make sure you purchase tested DIMM's.![]()
Get any Crucial PC4-19200 SODIMM RAM and you should be fine.
I have been using this Crucial Ballistix Sport 2x16GB for a total of 40GB in my 2017 iMac since I took delivery 2 weeks ago and it has been flawless. Keep in mind that on Crucial's website, the RAM is noted to be Incompatible with the 2017 iMac.
You don't need to get the RAM that Crucial markets as iMac-compatible. See this thread for more details.
It will make a difference with an Apple Care issue if one arises. They will look for Apple RAM such as OCW, and Crucial have tested. But hey, it's your money guys.![]()
Really? Well thats nice. I'm still looking at 7-18-17.
[doublepost=1499030986][/doublepost]
No. This is the correct Crucial RAM for the 2017. Not in stock. Make sure you purchase tested DIMM's.
Part Number
CT2K16G4S24AM
It absolutely will NOT make a difference with AppleCare. That's misinformation. Apple doesn't care what third party RAM you install in your machine. They provide the specs and the instructions for you to do so. I've owned Macs for 11 years, installed third party RAM in all off them and have filed AppleCare claims numerous times with no such issues ever.
If you put in incompatible RAM and as a result have system instability, kernel panics, etc, you're obviously not going to be filing an AppleCare claim for that. Apple will advise you to remove any third party RAM you added to your system and test to see if it resolves your problems first.
But if you think Apple is going to get your machine back for a failed hard drive component of a Fusion Drive or for some other hardware failure and then check your RAM and say "warranty voided because this is not Crucial's iMac-certified part!", you're just wrong.
You win.![]()
Yes, this is in stock and has been. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B019FRCV9G/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o02_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 I personally ordered this 16x2 and have it installed currently without any issues.
I am waiting for CT2K16G4S24AM.
![]()
Yes, this is in stock and has been. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B019FRCV9G/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o02_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 I personally ordered this 16x2 and have it installed currently without any issues.
No, you have CT2K16G4SFD824A.
I am waiting for CT2K16G4S24AM.
But, thats just me.![]()
Good to hear and absolutely as expected. In this case the non-Apple-certified but perfectly functional alternative is both in stock and $15 cheaper.
It's the $15 Certified for Mac label surcharge.
Micron says they apply that label after intensive testing. Well, I ran Memtest86 on my supposedly (according to the Crucial website compatibility tool) incompatible for iMac Crucial Ballistix Sport + Apple Stock Ram combination for 4 passes and 5 hours in my non A/C room while I was out today at ambient temps of 35°C+ with zero errors. 40GB at 2400MHz.
Over two weeks of heavy usage, occasional gaming and no instability, kernel panics or otherwise.
We agree, but it's even worse than that if you're bringing stuff like this into the equation.
Typical read-write power utilization for the Samsung 960 Pro PCIe SSD is 4-6 W, but the idle is around 0.1 W. If you look at active idle it's closer to 1.2 W. In contrast, some of the media-production oriented 7200 rpm drives use 6-9 Watts for read/write, but idle at 5-8 Watts. It will be lower for cheaper 5400 rpm drive, but they're still generally 3 Watts and up at idle, and much higher for read/write
Given that 98% of an SSD's time is at idle, it can be almost an order of magnitude difference overall in power utilization.
Interestingly, two SKUs are present in my order description, shown below:
CT10559859 CT2K8G4S24AM.000 16GB UPGRADE FOR A APPLE IMAC (RETINA 5K, 27-INCH, 2017) SYSTEM
I paid $136.99 for it at the time.
I'll never install anything but OEM Crucial (for Mac) in any Mac I own. Never have , never will.
Other than Micron being a main OEM supplier for Apple, the shortages are from customer demand also. There is a reason for this.![]()
after restoring my system that i try to keep around 250Gb I tested the fusion drive with black magic and got
854 write 1277 readmy old SSD was around 500 write 600 read, not sure if it will slow down over time but i work with small text and image files ( web developer )
The point is to get whatever good quality RAM is available and at the best price for you and not to worry about labeling.
[doublepost=1499120045][/doublepost]
More power to you.
Yes, the reason is that their marketing works. Most average users aren't visiting to these forums and have no idea that all they need to do is to get good RAM that follows the specs on the Apple memory upgrade pages.
Advice.
"When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be."
Lao Tzu
This is one of my favorite Chinese proverbs:
惩前毖后 (Learn from past mistakes to avoid future ones.)
My favourite:My favorite:
"Those that do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it." ~ Santayana