And after all, what's important is whether or not a company is winning the marketing war.
I never said it was, and I don't believe it is. It's just that given that the world is under the impression that Canon and Nikon are the only options (primarily just because they hold market share), then it seems pertinent to show that they haven't killed off the competition yet and that there are many other manufacturers putting out great equipment that shouldn't be disregarded because they have small market share.