Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sure, because it's *impossible* to write a buffer overflow in C64 BASIC. :rolleyes:

Seriously, if you have the know-how and motivation, you can blow through just about any sandbox with code *intended* to do so. It just takes the knowledge of a weak spot in the sandbox's walls.

Quite. And the iPhone's security historically has been... well... not very good. There are almost certainly holes.

Phazer
 
Seriously, if you have the know-how and motivation, you can blow through just about any sandbox with code *intended* to do so. It just takes the knowledge of a weak spot in the sandbox's walls.

But it's not technically a sandbox, it's an emulated processor and hardware. It's not just an interpreter it's a complete emulation, including memory space emulation.

There is no way to run native ARM code using the 6502 code, even though the original ARM processor instruction set *WAS* based upon a simplified 6502 instruction set.
 
Apple have pulled it.
The hack was in an Easter egg.
What a bone headed move on the part of the developer. :eek:
 
I can live with out CBM BASIC V2.0 just as long as when it comes back to the App Store it's got Compunet access at emulated 1200/75 Baud so I don't have to use the Internet anymore.

MUD, anyone?
 
Does anyone know if they used the open source code to mimic CRT screen flicker? It looks like they did...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.