...They're still around because they're selling machines,
You're going to tout MagSafe as a huge feature then? I had a 17" PB G4 1.33 without MagSafe, and it worked flawlessly. Now where does that leave us....
1280x800 is the screen resolution (and the goofy glossy display, but that's another matter entirely). Think it is a 9-cell battery... I get about 4 hours out of it during normal use.[/QUOTE
]I never said anything about the MagSafe adapter.
You must have got a great deal, because I cannot get a Dell laptop, with the price you quoted earlier, with a 1280x800 resolution and a 9-cell battery, without the order being customized and thus raising the price.
Why are people criticizing them when they are still paying for a copy of Leopard?
Wow. They purchase the OSX copies legally.
People I have a Macpro and a monster desktop PC that I built. One computer I use for everyday task like work and email and internet surfing and the other is a bleeding edge, take and test everything you can throw at machine. I love my macpro and leopard. It always works and I never worry about it. I love my PC and it destroys my MAC at all high-end work but is breaking down all the time (I love to play with electronics). My point is you are not running the bleeding edge technology on any MAC computer, especially their laptops. You are paying for the apple experience and beauty. Anyone that argues the price difference between an apple laptop and a PC laptop is not that different has no clue about computer parts. Now if you argue that the extra money spent is worth it then that is a different story altogether.
That got a chuckle out of me.What would be funny is to set up a shell company and start selling "open open computers", that are Pystar compatible.
How do you like them Apples?
I don't care what anyone says or what the price is... I'd rather have a Rolex than a Romex or Rayban's and not Bayran's. Having the real thing is always better than a swamp meet/flea market quality cheap knock off.
I never said anything about the MagSafe adapter.
You must have got a great deal, because I cannot get a Dell laptop, with the price you quoted earlier, with a 1280x800 resolution and a 9-cell battery, without the order being customized and thus raising the price.
So, are these criminals still free-riding on Apple's R&D and selling machines to the "masses"? I hope they close up shop in no time.
They are not a competitor - a competitor actually has to do something!
I did, if you care to read the thread.
I don't care what anyone says or what the price is... I'd rather have a Rolex than a Romex or Rayban's and not Bayran's. Having the real thing is always better than a swamp meet/flea market quality cheap knock off.
Well, the MB has more bus speed, more cache, and faster RAM. That ,and that Dell only has Windows Vista Home Premium.Seems pretty similar to the $1299 MB, no?
I'm so glad that you guys will be happy when OS X shoots up to $400. Because the current price is based on the fact that Apple gets a hardware sale out of it, you know.
If this clone deal ends up being permenant, say goodbay to $129 copies of OS X. This idea bothers me, but I guess you two will be fine.
That's okay, I am sometimes guilty of the same thing.Sorry about the MagSafe. I got so many replies that everyone is becoming a blur now...
Well, the MB has more bus speed, more cache, and faster RAM. That ,and that Dell only has Windows Vista Home Premium.
Why are you tempted? Get OSX86 and throw your own rig together.
Why are people criticizing them when they are still paying for a copy of Leopard? They may be violating EULA, but they aren't stealing the OS from Apple.
I'm so glad that you guys will be happy when OS X shoots up to $400. Because the current price is based on the fact that Apple gets a hardware sale out of it, you know.
If this clone deal ends up being permenant, say goodbay to $129 copies of OS X. This idea bothers me, but I guess you two will be fine.
I see now that you have your specs, model and price in different posts.
You seem to leave out in your analysis form-factor and build quality, the graphics card, the difference in processor/FSB/cache, memory type/speed, screen quality, multitouch trackpad, weight, OS/included software, etc.
As someone said before, the m1330 is a much more comparable machine. Also noted before, Macs may seem expensive, but that's largely due to the fact that they don't have a low-end SKU.
Now, I won't argue that you don't pay a premium for an Apple machine, but it's certainly not as bad as you tried to make it seem. Plus, to top it off, there are a lot of little things that you just won't be able to match in a competitor's laptop like the all-aluminum enclosure, glass screen, etc.
Honestly, I don't know. That's just the way it came and that's the price I paid. I guess they could have had a deal going on. I just needed a laptop for the wife, and ordered it.
Sorry about the MagSafe. I got so many replies that everyone is becoming a blur now...
That is what I'd like to know as well.
So if that's the laptop for the wife, what do you use?
has anyone seen any report on sales volume?