Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Twice the price of the PC Version and obviously a welcome way to unload stock before the 4850/70 and their budget brethrens hit the PC shelves.
Why no 4850/70 for the MAC?

Not to kill the new graphics card high everyone's enjoying, but you are exactly right about the offloading of old stock right as the 4800 series comes out.
 
Not to kill the new graphics card high everyone's enjoying, but you are exactly right about the offloading of old stock right as the 4800 series comes out.

And with the Nehalem Mac Pros we will get 4-series Radeon cards while PC users will have 5-series Radeon cards. :rolleyes:

We should ask AMD to release new video cards for the Mac Pro every 6 months. Pretty much a six-month cycle. I think that's a good idea.
 
iPhones. Computers are, and will remain, on the backburner. No new ACD, Mini, Blu-ray, non-glossy iMac, card readers on laptops or video card updates. I picked a great time to switch. :mad:

Apple's been behind on the video card front since long before the iPhone. It's simply a much smaller market (obviously limited to only Mac Pros) and thus gets less attention from ATI and Nvidia. There are fewer technical barriers than during the PPC days, so the situation should slowly but surely get better.

I wouldn't hold my breath on Blu-Ray support in Mac OS X, by the way. Knowing Apple, they would be loath to implement the onerous, end-to-end DRM it requires for playback.
 
I thought it was coming out for $220? That's not twice the price.. at least not twice the introductory price. Did they drop it to $100? That can't be right...

You're not wrong though... but that's generally how it's done with Macs. Kinda always been that way. It's unfortunate, especially given how much faster the 4870's supposed to be.

On the bright side though, it can replace a lot of those 1900XTs, especially given how absurdly overpriced the 1900's were.

I guess they just don't have anywhere near the number of resources devoted to developing Mac drivers/BIOS versions for the card as they do the PC (which makes sense) so it takes them a lot longer to come out. Oh well.

It does seem like they could make it every-other product cycle instead of skipping like three generations, though...
 
And with the Nehalem Mac Pros we will get 4-series Radeon cards while PC users will have 5-series Radeon cards. :rolleyes:

We should ask AMD to release new video cards for the Mac Pro every 6 months. Pretty much a six-month cycle. I think that's a good idea.

The Nahalem Mac Pros may offer the Radeon 4xxx as a CTO, but you can bet that it will also be available for all models of Mac Pro, unlike what Apple did with the GeForce 8800 GT.
 
Did they charge or put a hold on your credit card?


Damn !


It appears that they charged me BEFORE shipment :rolleyes:


It may just be a CC ping but it looks like a full charge to me. If it goes away in the next few days, I will report.


Otherwise, assume you will pay the entire amount at the time of order.
 
I'm told that WoW will gobble up 1GB of VRAM, if you have it to spare, when you set the terrain detail/distance to max.

I don't imagine that could be true, unless it's running uncompressed textures... but even if it were, at any resolution requiring 1 GB of RAM, the Radeon 3870 would already be choking to the point where you'd need a faster graphics card rather than a larger frame buffer.

Adding more memory chips to a card isn't the technological challenge, it's the large price rise that would result for (actually, in many cases a tiny performance <i>decrease</i>) the one or two instances out of hundreds where it might help.

ATI is trying to keep prices down because they can't compete at the moment with nVidia at higher price offerings... it wouldn't make any kind of sense, technical or fiscal.
 
Indeed, this pernicious rumor was begun by two sites: Barefeats and xlr8yourmac.com. This story was then reprinted by other websites, many often quoting directly from Barefeats. I suspect that this has had the effect of driving a lot of traffic to these two sites. In the end, I doubt there will be any new card for the MacPro. As others have noted, Apple only introduces new graphics card with the release of a new model of the MacPro. Now that the WWDC has ended, I think that is a moment to reflect on the circulation of "Mac rumors" and to call out those who spread them.

That's almost libelous, especially considering how much those two sites have done for the Mac community. Quoted for posterity.
 
Much quieter. It's on par with the GeForce 8800 GT on noise levels.

Would it be too much trouble to see if the layout of the top of the card matches the ATI 2600?

I'm curious if current aftermarket passive heatsinks will fit. I'm a quiet computing nerd. :cool:
 
I'll give you guys an early look at my test results on the Radeon HD 3870 Mac & PC Edition (vs other GPUs for the 2006-2008 Mac Pro).

http://www.barefeats.com/harper16.html (Core Image apps)

http://www.barefeats.com/harper17.html (Mac Games)

http://www.barefeats.com/harper18.html (PC only Games under Vista 64)

I've a question: what happens if you leave 2x3870s with Crossfire jumper connected in the machine when you boot into OS X? Certainly you wouldn't get the benefit of Crossfire, but what does happen? Does it boot; do both cards behave normally? Worst case, do their fans run normally with video coming out of at least one?
 
I've a question: what happens if you leave 2x3870s with Crossfire jumper connected in the machine when you boot into OS X? Certainly you wouldn't get the benefit of Crossfire, but what does happen? Does it boot; do both cards behave normally? Worst case, do their fans run normally with video coming out of at least one?

It runs normally. Unless you have a display connected to the second card, it is virtually ignored. The same is true when I had two Radeon HD 2600 XTs jumped in Crossfire mode.
 
Why do the Barefeats test results look so much better than the Xlr8 ones?

I started to wonder same thing after I saw their OpenGL test of the 2600 which scored about 300 points higher than 95% of website/forums/blogs I've read.

Something isn't completely right here.
 
I started to wonder same thing after I saw their OpenGL test of the 2600 which scored about 300 points higher than 95% of website/forums/blogs I've read.

Something isn't completely right here.

Each machine produces different results, even though they have the same specs. :rolleyes:
 
Seriously, do you just look at numbers without having a damn clue what they mean? The only cards that need that much memory are workstation graphics cards.

Moore's law has to do with the total number of transistors on a chip doubling every 18 months or so, nothing to do with speed. And actually, it's more complicated than that. Go do some reading.

Actually increasing transistor amount usually means reduced line width which usually means more speed.
But my point was that so far AFAIK 3870 doesn't give anything more to pro apps user than 1900 gave 2 years ago. So there must be (again) something really wrong with the drivers.
I'd like to do fullHD graphics with Motion, but 1900 is just too slow and has too little memory for that. I can't afford a gpu which costs as much as the whole other system, so I was hoping that 3870 would be optimal solution for greater power and cost effectiveness. Sadly it does not seem to be that... or maybe we just wait another half an year for better drivers...
 
Expecting what is essentially a gaming card to compete with a professional rendering card at the task of rendering is a little silly, no?
 
Why do the Barefeats test results look so much better than the Xlr8 ones?

For one thing. XLR8YourMac tested on a 2.66GHz "2006" 4-core Mac Pro (6GB of RAM) and a 2.8GHz "early 2008" 8-core Mac Pro (8GB of RAM).

BareFeats tested on a 3.0GHz "2007" 8-core Mac Pro (16GB of RAM) and a 3.2GHz "early 2008" 8-core Mac Pro (16GB of RAM).
 
Now I'm normally a barefeats fan, but what the heck is up with the older mac showing the same or slower results with the new card vs the 1900?

This is getting very annoying - I had to send my 8800 card back to apple because the performance on Battlefield 2142 was totally unplayable, and I've been hearing good things about this card, and now the benchmarks show it's no better than a 3-4 year old card??? how can that possibly be? that would be like a 2ghz Intel chip running the same stats as a new 3.2ghz chip.
 
Does the 3870 PC&Mac edition support Crossfire in the Mac Pro?

Hello there - sorry if my question was already answered in this thread but as far as I understand the Mac&PC edition of the 3870 will support Crossfire on a "Crossfire-supporting mainboard" in Windows/Vista ... this does not necessarily mean that Crossfire is supported running Windows/Vista on a Mac Pro 2008, right? Does anybody have more info about this? For me a switch to the 3870 would only make sense if this would allow me to use two in Crossfire. Also, does anybody know if a 3870x2 will work with the EFI used in the coming 3870?
Thanks for any info & hints!
 
Also, does anybody know if a 3870x2 will work with the EFI used in the coming 3870?
Thanks for any info & hints!
No idea but I'm willing to try it on my 3870x2. There is a DDR4 v DDR3 RAM difference between the boards but I only need the EFI loader from it and the drivers should take over after the mac boots.
 
Expecting what is essentially a gaming card to compete with a professional rendering card at the task of rendering is a little silly, no?
I'd say that 8800 is a gaming card since it's faster in games and slow with Motion & Color, but I hoped that 3870 would be better choise for Motion & Color than 2600. If you're just using FCS and no 3d modelling software, 3k$ quadro isn't very reasonable choise...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.