To hit $250 would likely mean a return to the Mini 2 chassis with unlaminated display. Would be appealing with A11 at that price I suppose.I guess in that case they could have kept the Mini 4 around simultaneously and slashed the price to $250, maybe dropped the storage down to 64GB, and keep it around for the low-end-but-specialized users like restaurants and retailers who use them for singular tasks, or people who just want one for books and nothing more (in which case an e-ink reader would be a better purchase, in my opinion).
I guess in part I’m happy because the Mini 5 hits a lot of points I wanted in finally upgrading from my Mini 2, and although it keeps almost the same external design it debuted with way back in 2012, it isn’t an underwhelming upgrade in terms of performance. Plus, since the Mini tends to not receive yearly updates, not putting the latest SoC in it would hamper it further in the next couple years if that remains the situation.
And while I like the idea of a Mini Pro, given everything it entails I could see it being a device with a $700 entry point. I kind of like the fact that the Mini 5 is a powerful enough tablet yet still relatively affordable.
Also, as an aside, if I were designing a Mini Pro, I’d keep the same 7.9 screen size and trim the bezels off to match the current 3rd-gen Pros. The current screen size feels just right. I like tablet-y tablets.
For you the Mini 5 knocked it out of the park and that’s great. It’s blazing fast and the screen quality is fantastic, I’m truly not knocking it. Perhaps my own expectations were just a bit unreasonable. I’d still like the slimmer bezels from the 10.5” to be grafted onto the Mini at least.
Hmmm, shrink the bezels around the 7.9” screen. I kind of like where you’re going with that; just keep the 10 hour battery life please! Probably makes more sense than going up to a nearly standard size 9” because the small housing would still mean something like a Smart Keyboard would be too small.