An iPhold.Do we call this an iPhad???
An iPhold.Do we call this an iPhad???
It’s roughly the same screen area as a regular iPhone, not really small IMO. Just trading height for width.Btw, can we have this Without unfolding mechanism? Like iPhone micro.
You will be able to reach the top, but only on the side of your respective hand. You’ll need to use both hands.Im not sure . Given the prehension needed to use that wide aspect ratio, you might not actually be able to reach the top with your thumb
It does seem pretty strange. It's as if they couldn't decide between a flip and a fold, so they went somewhere in the middle. I think a flip would have a pretty specific target audience and a fold would have a different target audience. I'm not sure this hits the flip audience much at all, but probably still gets the fold audience pretty excited.Great rendering! But when it’s closed its a bit too wide for my liking.
iPhonebook would be a very Apple name.Do we call this an iPhad???
Here is a video about this amazing new form factor:
The narrower you make the outside screen, the more square the inside screen becomes, and the less suitable for 16:9 video and the like. I suspect that is driving the design.It does seem pretty strange. It's as if they couldn't decide between a flip and a fold, so they went somewhere in the middle.
One article the other day suggested an exact resolution and sizes for screens so that let me sketch out the device, using these as a fix and working my way outwards.
The narrower you make the outside screen, the more square the inside screen becomes, and the less suitable for 16:9 video and the like. I suspect that is driving the design.
When the diagonals originally leaked, I thought Apple was going for the same aspect ratio for the inner and outer screen (which would result in 1:1.41), so that apps could be switched between inner and outer screen without having to change their layout (i.e. the app may not even notice). But with the latest details, the aspect ratios seem to differ enough for that theory to be wrong.
Yeah, but I would rather expect a larger “unsafe” zone on the outer display due to the front camera (as in your renders), which would increase rather than decrease the difference in aspect ratio.I know Apple always specify 'safe zones' to avoid the home bar etc, so maybe in one orientation the safe zone will be a bit more generous to create an equal aspect ratio![]()
The “fat nano”!Closed aspect ratio gives me flashbacks to the third gen iPod nano, I like it. Something different.
View attachment 2507886
Any iOS app built to iOS SDKs from the last few years must scale to different screen sizes. That's why iPhone apps work well in iPad Slideover.Nice renders! My immediate thought is given the dramatically different aspect ratio for the outer display, a lot of apps may struggle to scale correctly without updates? Letterboxing would make for a truly tiny 16:9/19.5:9 app! I'm assuming the inner display will use the iPad versions where available, or possibly letterbox an iPhone version initially.
They dont have to. Instagram, for example, on the iPad is still just the narrow phone app.Any iOS app built to iOS SDKs from the last few years must scale to different screen sizes. That's why iPhone apps work well in iPad Slideover.
What you're saying makes sense, and is obviously true. But you paint this picture as if Apple is tackling a brand new problem. There are dozens of androids out there that somehow manage to have different ratios. I get that Apple has different standards for stuff like this, but having their devs create solutions for 2 more screen sizes really isn't the biggest deal on earth...The narrower you make the outside screen, the more square the inside screen becomes, and the less suitable for 16:9 video and the like. I suspect that is driving the design.
When the diagonals originally leaked, I thought Apple was going for the same aspect ratio for the inner and outer screen (which would result in 1:1.41), so that apps could be switched between inner and outer screen without having to change their layout (i.e. the app may not even notice). But with the latest details, the aspect ratios seem to differ enough for that theory to be wrong.
I made two separate points. The first, import one doesn’t relate to same/different aspect ratios, but to having a non-square aspect ratio for the inner screen. And the less important one was acknowledging that Apple apparently isn’t going for the same aspect ratio.What you're saying makes sense, and is obviously true. But you paint this picture as if Apple is tackling a brand new problem. There are dozens of androids out there that somehow manage to have different ratios. I get that Apple has different standards for stuff like this, but having their devs create solutions for 2 more screen sizes really isn't the biggest deal on earth...