I hear this a lot but my S6 Edge has a screen protector that is absolutely awesome, maybe the best one I've ever used. It's made by Zagg.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Phones Samsung Galaxy S8
- Thread starter Surf Donkey
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I hear this a lot but my S6 Edge has a screen protector that is absolutely awesome, maybe the best one I've ever used. It's made by Zagg.
Another Samsung will never be a sell for me until they leave Android. I don't care what it looks like. Samsung's software skin and optimization sucks. Focus on Tizen. Google needs to create another OS to use exclusively for themselves. I hardly call Google having an ecosystem when most of their best apps are found on other platforms or you can access using their services using a mobile browser. Android users aren't really stuck.
Take away the battery recall, and the Note7 should NOT act laggy, stutter, and hiccup the moment you get the phone. This shouldn't be like iPhone about four years later like the lag iPhone 5 users are experiencing with iOS10. The root of the evil is in the software. Google's oil don't mix with Samsung's vinegar. So I really could care less if the S8 has 4K (PenTile as usual) and the dual edge (cosmetic gimmick) becomes standard and drop the edge moniker.
Project Dream? It better be a dream after the Note7 nightmare. Until Samsung keeps their skin as light as Motorola and Sony, they will never learn their lesson with laggy software. S8 and Note8 will be plagued with it too.
Take away the battery recall, and the Note7 should NOT act laggy, stutter, and hiccup the moment you get the phone. This shouldn't be like iPhone about four years later like the lag iPhone 5 users are experiencing with iOS10. The root of the evil is in the software. Google's oil don't mix with Samsung's vinegar. So I really could care less if the S8 has 4K (PenTile as usual) and the dual edge (cosmetic gimmick) becomes standard and drop the edge moniker.
Project Dream? It better be a dream after the Note7 nightmare. Until Samsung keeps their skin as light as Motorola and Sony, they will never learn their lesson with laggy software. S8 and Note8 will be plagued with it too.
If Samsng cant do Android right why would Tizen be any different?
I think Tizen is already pretty much together. I bought a Z2 from craigslist at $50 not to long ago, and Tizen was pretty damn smooth and had basically most of the features TW has. I'll say on a higher end phone, Samsung could make a Tizen shine. All Tizen needs is apps, I'm not going to settle for android app compatibly.
Interesting... then maybe it's not as far off as I thought. However, yea... the apps.
And that will be the biggest hurdle as without market share getting developers to create alternative versions of their apps optimised specifically for the platform will remain a challenge, look at Blackberry and Windows mobile situation.
If they can make Android apps run natively within Tizen, that would be a good compromise - though I would imagine Samsung would want to take full control of its App Store on Tizen.
Did the Tizen handset have anything other than Samsung's own store ? I assume there was no Google Play Store ?
I think if anyone outside of Apple and Google can do it, Samsung can. So I'm not too pessimistic about it. They have already proven they can get the big names and services. Google services would be a huge question mark though.
This is something I want to avoid. The Android app compatibility on BB was subpar at best.
No Google Play store. It did have two apps stores, One was Samsung apps, and another was some India app store that I couldn't change the language to figure it out.
I dont want to fork over extra money for an Edge either. I'd just prefer the choice as i dont feel the edge is a must have thing. As for Apple....yeah, thats their M.O. and why i just avoid their phones. Lacking features and dont offer the same camera fr the smaller phone. Just bad customer PR by not offering the better camera for both but thats how they roll and why i dont follow them anymore. They been doing it for years.
I think if the edge screen panels make it to both models, the smaller model will probably still stay at the same price category as the standard S7 now, right? Something in that $650 range.
I suppose a price bump could happen, too. Hopefully not.
Samsung do need to up profit margin on their flagship (they tried with Samsung SDI to do that through manufacturing). Now because of the mammoth $$ hit this year it wouldn't surprise me to see a $50-100 rise across their flagship line next year. Though like Apple, price hikes could be disproportionate depending on country / region (so European customers hit harder than USA customers) ....
http://www.phonearena.com/news/More...a-Snapdragon-830Exynos-chips-expected_id86403
More Galaxy S8 rumors: no Home button, dual camera, Snapdragon 830/Exynos chips expected
More Galaxy S8 rumors: no Home button, dual camera, Snapdragon 830/Exynos chips expected
Glass. They won't lose wireless charging. The big news on design will be the front bezel getting even more eliminated. Integrated touch home button under the display type stuff. The back will be mostly the same but with dual cameras. Maybe some other subtle changes.
Probably no head phones jack.
I hope they figure out a way for front dual speakers.
Probably no head phones jack.
I hope they figure out a way for front dual speakers.
So why do they produce some with Snapdragon and others with the Exynos? I am curious to see where they go with the camera tech, Samsung has been hitting it out of the park the past couple years. I am also wondering what happens on the battery front, I wonder if Samsung could release a metal phone but with a battery that can pop out like the sim tray does. Als9, phones are thin enough Imogen, I don't know anyone clamoring for thinner than we have now
I believe (what I read) it's to do with the CMDA modem required by some of your USA carriers and a patent owned by Qualcomm which means if they use exynos they have to pay a royalty to QC regardless.
Perhaps QC offer a deal such as buy your SOC from us and we will waive the royalty license for the modem tech.
I do think Samsung's exynos is the better chip.
Re : slimmer, yes as the Moto Z proves, slimmer comes at the cost of bigger camera humps (if we still want great camera) smaller battery and loss of ports .. to me thinner isn't better.
We've seen Samsung come back with amazing things when their sales hurt. It'll be great to see how they bounce back.
http://www.androidcentral.com/galaxy-s8-slick-design-improved-camera-enhanced-ai-service
Galaxy S8 to feature a slick design, improved camera, and an enhanced AI service
Quite excited about this, too. Finally we're moving away from buttons.
Galaxy S8 will be the first smartphone with optical fingerprint recognition
http://www.sammobile.com/2016/10/26...rtphone-with-optical-fingerprint-recognition/
I wonder what that means for the capacitive buttons on the sides...
http://www.androidcentral.com/galaxy-s8-slick-design-improved-camera-enhanced-ai-service
Galaxy S8 to feature a slick design, improved camera, and an enhanced AI service
Quite excited about this, too. Finally we're moving away from buttons.
Galaxy S8 will be the first smartphone with optical fingerprint recognition
http://www.sammobile.com/2016/10/26...rtphone-with-optical-fingerprint-recognition/
I wonder what that means for the capacitive buttons on the sides...
To be honest this irks me. Why ?
Well here we have an example of Samsung essentially 'wasting' resources on an new AI when surely it would be more cost affective to utilise Google Assistant and make sure all Samsung's apps are updated with GA's api's.
No matter how improved the new Samsung AI assistant will be compared to S-Voice, it isn't going to be as good as GA and in most cases users will simply do what they always do .. remove it or disable it as they will not want TWO services on their devices doing essentially same thing.
Samsung need to drop the duplication of TW. Tone it back and use those resources and developments into areas such as better and quicker OS updates.
Unifying OS updates throughout its flagship devices so that they all get quick updates to the latest GUI changes and such.
But no, that would be common sense, instead Samsung do what they always seem to do and waste not only their resources but inevitably the resources on the device, as duplicate apps and services invariably impact ram usage and system usage.
Samsung get the hardware mostly right (trying to expunge the Note 7 fiasco from that statement) but generally always mess up software wise to some lesser or greater extent.
I'm hoping the success of the Google Pixel will show Samsung they don't need to waste resources.
Give us a S7/S7e with usual generational improvements but on top of a clean OS and make Touchwiz working like any third party launcher - so we keep TW themes and general look, but without the years and years of legacy Gluck that still makes up the bones TW today
Stop making half baked alternatives to solutions already baked in or offered in Android and deliver us speedy OS updates.
Please Samsung ... please !
Last edited:
That would be ideal. I've always said Samsung should take a page out of HTC's book and eliminate duplicate apps and just go with Google's.
Unfortunately, I don't see that happening. They've really carved out their own marketshare and mindshare in the Android space and I simply don't see them turning back. Especially now with Google effectively getting into the hardware game. If anything, Samsung probably feels they have to continue down their path even further. Haven't they said publically, too, that if necessary, they're willing to go completely their own way with Tizen if that day comes? That way, they control the hardware and software just like Apple has been doing and now Google. Tizen will present many challenges, but I wouldn't be surprised if Samsung is already planning for it.
Having said that, the duplicate app situation is rather easy to mitigate. Speed and RAM management has been improving with each iteration of TouchWiz; I am simply not worried about it anymore. My S7E is as smooth as it's been since day one. Tmobile has been pretty good about security updates, missing a month here and there, but it hasn't stopped (yet!). Those I care about. Better time tables for major software updates are always welcomed, but nowadays, it just isn't a must have (and in my specific case, if I upgrade to the next Galaxy device, I'm basically on a yearly cycle with the software anyway. For example, Marshmallow from March 2016 to March 2017, and then Nougat with the new device from March 2017 to March 2018, etc.).
As for wasting resources, I understand that argument. Yet many of Samsung's software experiments and attempts have lead to standard features in Nougat.
Like I said, it's always interesting to see what Samsung does when their numbers are down. They've proven they can listen to the community and critics, and can tackle specific shortcomings of their flagships. And now with even more riding on the line, the S8 should be very interesting. The Note 7 was able to refine what was already a refined package in the S7E. I can't wait to see what they have in store for the S8.
As for hardware, if the Pixels had brought their A game in this department, things would be a lot tougher for Samsung. But until the Pixel 2, Samsung still has a huge opportunity for impressive hardware to lead sales.
http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-galaxy-s8-edge-to-edge-display-725877/
Samsung Galaxy S8 to have 90% screen-to-body ratio?
and Won-sang said that it could produce a device with a 99 percent screen-to-body ratio in the next few years.
Samsung Galaxy S8 to have 90% screen-to-body ratio?
and Won-sang said that it could produce a device with a 99 percent screen-to-body ratio in the next few years.