Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Same Intel Tylersburg chipset features. The only difference is a revision to Apple's System Management Controller.

Yeah, not to beat you over the head, IowaLynn, but I brought out my block diagrams to compare and confirm as well. The 3rd and 4th slots ARE a bit different in that they share a PCIe switch back to the North Bridge controller, whereas Slots 1 & 2 each have their own dedicated links. But that's true for all 2009-2012 systems (and I believe 2008s as well, but I can't find a block diagram to verify that).

-Fred
 
These are garbage correct? Are they even actually m.2? https://eshop.macsales.com/item/OWC/SSDPHSETR480/#owctabs
Not sure that they're garbage necessarily, but they are in a different class than the PCIe-based SSD blades being discussed here. These are modules to upgrade the OWC Accelsior, and you get a pair of SATA-III blades with this kit. The Accelsior is a PCIe card, but these blades on it are SATA. Performance tops out around x2 PCIe or around 700-800MB/s for the pair. Compare that to about 1500MB/s for a single SSUBX/SM951 PCIe x4 blade...
 
Not sure that they're garbage necessarily, but they are in a different class than the PCIe-based SSD blades being discussed here. These are modules to upgrade the OWC Accelsior, and you get a pair of SATA-III blades with this kit. The Accelsior is a PCIe card, but these blades on it are SATA. Performance tops out around x2 PCIe or around 700-800MB/s for the pair. Compare that to about 1500MB/s for a single SSUBX/SM951 PCIe x4 blade...
Thanks for the clarification. So these are basically SSD's in m.2 form? Meaning not the same technology as xp941's, SM951's ect...
 
Angelbird seems to learn from the best in selling overpriced stuff (OWC).:rolleyes:
Any heatsink which you can attach to the SSD will do, there is no "proper one".
Rest is a matter of look.

A small update for folks concerned with temps and who don't like to buy overpriced stuff.
Cheap adapter from Ali + DYI heatsink scavenged from FB DIMM module.
5 mins of dremel and paint job. Costs next to nothing, works well, looks good.

DIY_heatsink.jpg
 
Last edited:
For those of you with a PCIe SSD on a mac pro, can you take picture of the finder sidebar? Does it have an eject button next to it and is it registered as a external drive?
 
The PCIe SSD (SSUBX) that is used to boot OS X does not have an eject button appear, the other PCIe SSD's in the system do have the eject button appear in the sidebar.

Screen Shot 2016-05-12 at 11.16.10 PM.png
 
$600 - Dual Lycom DT-120 M.2 Adapters with Samsung 256GB XP941s. (2300MB/s/s)

The first post in this thread shows that you can install dual XP941s to get increased throughput. I tried doing the same with dual SM951s on Lycom DT-120 boards in RAID0. I didn't see any increase in throughput over a single SM951. I tried in PCIe slot 3&4, 2&4, and 2&3 and benchmarked around 1400MB/s in any configuration. I double checked to make sure they weren't in RAID1.

I'll only have this extra SM951 for another day or so. Is there anyway I can increase the throughput for both of these cards over what you would expect from a single card?
 
The first post in this thread shows that you can install dual XP941s to get increased throughput. I tried doing the same with dual SM951s on Lycom DT-120 boards in RAID0. I didn't see any increase in throughput over a single SM951. I tried in PCIe slot 3&4, 2&4, and 2&3 and benchmarked around 1400MB/s in any configuration. I double checked to make sure they weren't in RAID1.

I'll only have this extra SM951 for another day or so. Is there anyway I can increase the throughput for both of these cards over what you would expect from a single card?
Sm951 only runs at half speed in slot 2 for some reason. 1400 to 1500 is max for slots 3 and 4 no matter if you raid them or not. The xp941 can run at full speed in slot 2, so if you want greater throughput you would need an xp941 in slots 2 and 3 set up in raid 0.
 
Sm951 only runs at half speed in slot 2 for some reason. 1400 to 1500 is max for slots 3 and 4 no matter if you raid them or not. The xp941 can run at full speed in slot 2, so if you want greater throughput you would need an xp941 in slots 2 and 3 set up in raid 0.

Thank you for the very informative reply.

I've been very happy with my single SM951 in slot 3. Since it was a rare occasion and had my hands on 2 sm951s, I figured I'd give it a shot to see how much faster they would be in a RAID. I'm Kinda glad it doesn't work so I'm not tempted to put another $300 into a 5 year old computer and tie up another slot. Now, what's it going to take for me to stop lusting over that 4 blade Amfeltec setup?
 
Last edited:
Now, what's it going to take for me to stop lusting over that 4 blade Amfeltec setup?

Ahhh ... buying one like I just did might help ... :p Already chomping at the bit waiting for it to arrive! The 4x 512GB Sm951's I just ordered too will be here before it. Gah!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fooze
I was hoping to report success today with my install of an SM951 512gb SSD, but it was not to be.

I got my Lycom DT-120 card and installed the SM951, got everything into my Mac Pro, and nothing happened. The SSD wasn't recognized in either Windows or OSX. Finally in Windows, I pulled the Vendor ID off the card, and ran a search on it. The search revealed I had the NVMe version of the SSD, not the AHCI version. I pulled the card and checked the part number on the SSD, and sure enough, the vendor had sent me the wrong card. At least I will be able to return it for a full refund, and a new ACHI card is on it's way.
 
I was hoping to report success today with my install of an SM951 512gb SSD, but it was not to be.

I got my Lycom DT-120 card and installed the SM951, got everything into my Mac Pro, and nothing happened. The SSD wasn't recognized in either Windows or OSX. Finally in Windows, I pulled the Vendor ID off the card, and ran a search on it. The search revealed I had the NVMe version of the SSD, not the AHCI version. I pulled the card and checked the part number on the SSD, and sure enough, the vendor had sent me the wrong card. At least I will be able to return it for a full refund, and a new ACHI card is on it's way.

May be you can try the NVMe driver before you return the SSD.
 
I can vouch for the AHCI SM 951 and Lycom I installed a clean new OSX 10..10.5 on it for my Mid 2010 Mac Pro. Once installed it show up on the desk top automatically as a (yellow HD drive icon) with the name I gave it
 
Well I got my SM951 installed today. It gave me a bit of a scare because after I installed it, my computer wouldn't boot. I suspect the first time I tried to reset the SMC it didn't take. It started to boot again after being unplugged for 5 minutes. Now I just have to figure out how to fix my mail...
 
I recently purchased a Mac Pro 2010 6 core 3.33ghz and it comes with the standard 1TB HDD, I would like to add a 256 PCIe SSD card but I am a noob tech, I see that there are all kinds of factors to consider when buying these cards, can you guys please help me with links to an adapter+ a blade that are best for my Mac ? I would like to use the SSD for the OS and those 1500ish mb/s speeds are just crazy :) I will use the machine for audio edtiting (Logic Pro X)
 
Two options for 1500 MB/s

- Sintech adapter with grey market Apple PCI-E SSD from eBay (look for SSUBX)
- Lycom DT-120 PCIe adapter with SM951

Avoid NVME drives, prefer AHCI drives.
 
Thanks for the quick reply , I found this two options : http://www.ebay.com/itm/162075177129?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT
and this : http://www.ebay.com/itm/221591738684?_trksid=p2057872.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT
+ this :http://www.ebay.com/itm/33186884642...1a172790217&bu=44247720149&cp=1&sojTags=bu=bu

the first option with the sm951 is cheaper, are there differences on speed? the seller of the sm951 states that it reaches up to 1500mb/s speeds on slot 3/4....
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.