Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Ah don't say this! I got a buyer for tomorrow haha

But it is a great machine. And I think 15" is meh but that's me
:3 everyone thinks different when it comes to laptops.

Love my 13 probably will miss 12 but lots of overlap

Which 13" did you get? Just curious
 
Base non touchbar silver

Any upgrades or the 8GB RAM with 256GB HDD? I was looking at getting the 12" MB but it looks like with my corp discount I get the 13" nTB cheaper. I was deciding between the 13" nTB vs TB, only because of the 550 GPU.
 
Any upgrades or the 8GB RAM with 256GB HDD? I was looking at getting the 12" MB but it looks like with my corp discount I get the 13" nTB cheaper. I was deciding between the 13" nTB vs TB, only because of the 550 GPU.

Base- 8/256 2.0ghz

Eh I wouldn't get a tb for 550 over 540. If you care about graphics get the 15

Don't want to go too off topic tho. People chime in on this thread a bunch related to the point of thread. Thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: MyopicPaideia
2560x1440
<data>AAAUAAAAC0AAAAAB</data>
[doublepost=1487018576][/doublepost]MBP & iMac 5K vnc
[doublepost=1487018657][/doublepost]Screen Sharing
 
I've been using the 1680x1050 on my MacBook, and just picked up a 2016 MacBook Pro. . . Does anyone know what modes that display will support with this method?
 
I've been using the 1680x1050 on my MacBook, and just picked up a 2016 MacBook Pro. . . Does anyone know what modes that display will support with this method?

Which MacBook Pro? 13" or 15"?

On the 15" 1680 x 1050 is the default scaling.

On the 13" I have, 1680 x 1050 is available standard in system preferences as the 'more space' option. No hacks or anything required.
 
Which MacBook Pro? 13" or 15"?

On the 15" 1680 x 1050 is the default scaling.

On the 13" I have, 1680 x 1050 is available standard in system preferences as the 'more space' option. No hacks or anything required.

Sorry, I got the 15". I was hoping that I could go a bit higher than the 1900x1080 or whatever it is. . But I don't think there is a higher res that it could support with hiDPI mode other than that.
 
Sorry, I got the 15". I was hoping that I could go a bit higher than the 1900x1080 or whatever it is. . But I don't think there is a higher res that it could support with hiDPI mode other than that.
1680x1050 is the default resolution on the new 2016 15" MBP. I know because I had a maxed out one before selling it for more than I bought it for and going back to the awesome and magical 2015 rMB - also at 1680x1050 :D
 
Thanks for this guide, so easy to follow. For those that are wondering I can confirm that it works perfectly on the 2017 rMB (m3/8gb/256) running Sierra.

I've been running mine at 1680x1050 for nearly 2 weeks without any issues.
 
1680x1050 visible pixels on 2304x1400 physical pixels translate to a ~1.37 multiplier. That is, you will see one virtual pixel on ~1.37 physical pixels. Does it really look good? How can Apple do that? By magic? Not so HiDPI resolutions look pretty crappy on Windows machines for a comparison. Think of a 13" Windows laptop screen with an 1920x1080 physical resolution and the usual magnification for such Windows laptops.
 
Apparently beta build 17A362a is GM. I've just installed it and had to edit the file again and reboot and I've got 1680x1050 back again. 1440x900 (equiv.) killed me for all of 10 minutes.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-09-14 at 22.12.03.jpg
    Screen Shot 2017-09-14 at 22.12.03.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 340
1680x1050 visible pixels on 2304x1400 physical pixels translate to a ~1.37 multiplier. That is, you will see one virtual pixel on ~1.37 physical pixels. Does it really look good? How can Apple do that? By magic? Not so HiDPI resolutions look pretty crappy on Windows machines for a comparison. Think of a 13" Windows laptop screen with an 1920x1080 physical resolution and the usual magnification for such Windows laptops.
The desktop is actually drawn at double that - 3360x2100. Then that's scaled down to 2304x1400. That doesn't happen on Windows so it looks way worse.
 
1680x1050 visible pixels on 2304x1400 physical pixels translate to a ~1.37 multiplier. That is, you will see one virtual pixel on ~1.37 physical pixels. Does it really look good? How can Apple do that? By magic? Not so HiDPI resolutions look pretty crappy on Windows machines for a comparison. Think of a 13" Windows laptop screen with an 1920x1080 physical resolution and the usual magnification for such Windows laptops.
Yes, it really looks good. As mentioned, macOS Draws first at full blown out resolution giving an even multiplier. Windows has always been know to be utter crap at scaling resolutions properly....among many many many other things...
 
Nice!

no graphical glitches/ kernel panic?

I'm on 2015 but probably will give this a shot with GM, what is "your method" so I know to do it right?
[doublepost=1473702492][/doublepost]

where does the edited file on desktop come into play? after recovery mode (how do you do this?? ) do you then reboot to normal and replace the file?


As the file you need to edit is in read only, the only way you can edit it is to copy to your desktop and then modify it. However you can do one of two things. You can disable system protection integrity, edit the file where it is, then turn it back on again or do what I do, and copy the file to your desktop, edit the file, save it, reboot into Recovery mode (turn your Mac off then turn it back on holding command + R). I think Terminal is in the Utilities menu. Then you simply move the file over the top of the unedited one, then reboot. No need to disable SPI.

pac
[doublepost=1506380916][/doublepost]Confirmed working on GM, not GM candidate

pac
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-09-25 at 23.37.39.jpg
    Screen Shot 2017-09-25 at 23.37.39.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 303
Same here. A little glitchy on boot but it works.
Yup. Since 10.12 I’ve had the glitching on the lower portion of the screen at boot that @jason.rogers mentions above, but it is only present on the blank screen before the login screen comes up and everything works perfectly afterwards. Same behavior on 10.13.

Have passed this awesome 2015 MacBook on to a colleague now, and am rocking the mid 2017 13” MBP now, but this will probably go down as my favorite laptop of all time...
 
Has anyone tried this with macOS Mojave?

Edit: I tried it and it works. Although the link to the RDM app is dead, and I couldn't find another link.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NazgulRR
Thank you for letting us know that it works with macOS Mojave.

For RDM:

https://github.com/avibrazil/RDM/blob/master/README.md

At the end of the page there is a link for an installable binary package.
Let us know if it works.
As far as I can see this doesn't enable hiDPI on 1680X1050 on a MacBook, right? There's no lightning symbol on the resolution, and things look bit crappy? Have to use the hack?
 
As far as I can see this doesn't enable hiDPI on 1680X1050 on a MacBook, right? There's no lightning symbol on the resolution, and things look bit crappy? Have to use the hack?

There is a hiDPI 1680X1050 option (with lightning symbol) on my MacBook Retina 2016 following the instructions in the first post. Works just as good as on previous macOS.
 
For those who are curious about the Mojave update: I had to redo the file-modification, but 1680x1050 works also on MacOS Mojave! (MacBook Retina, 12-inch, Early 2015)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.