Firing for not apologizing![]()
I believe it was the last straw for him.
Firing for not apologizing![]()
Yeah, until you use an iPad and flip it from portrait to landscape and find that the icon that used to be the leftmost of the second row is now the rightmost of the first.You're absolutely right about this.
I've seen touchscreen based smartphones that allow users to drag icons around all over the place and, quite honestly, they always look a mess. What on earth is the value in being able to move an icon half an inch up or down?
The even and regular icon spacing on iOS keeps the small screen looking neat and makes locting apps easy. If I know an app I use is in the top row, on the right, I can find it almost without looking.
I am definitely happy that John Browett left. But Forstall, not so much. Yes, I do hate the old fashioned calendar, but how do we know as the public that Forstall hadn't been part of more than just the design of those specific apps?
I feel like forcing someone out for doing a job that Steve Jobs wanted them to do is not something that Apple should do.
Just my thoughts...
Enough to buy another million grey V-neck T-shirts.I wonder how much Ive will get paid now.
How profitable are they? How much money has Google made from Android? (And when you find the answer, you might ask yourself: Why is Google pushing Android at all).
I bet Scott ends up not at Google, but, obviously, Microsoft.
Andriod is free. its doesn't make a profit at all.
Errrm... What? Most profitable? There are more Android devices out there... Do you mean iTunes App Store profits or what?
This is more about working together as a team than anything else.
If you follow the profits of Android OEMs, apple makes more money from its iOS branch than the Android manufacturers make on their Android devices. Apple especially makes more on iOS than Google does from Android. Honestly though it would be interesting to see a chart of ALL combined Android profit vs iOS device profit.
Agreed. As little as I know about him, he seems to be someone who has had too much success at an early age. This can make, well, anyone too arrogant and unable to work with others. I can't imagine the ego he must have built in working with Jobs.
I can assure you that if you look at the profits of ALL Android OEMs combined, they are larger than Apple's profits from their iOS product range.
Why not when someone leaves voluntarily? Non-compete clause could make you a slave of your current company.
Samsung alone sells more smartphones than Apple:I'd like to see that chart or info. Samsung makes quite a bit from TVs, refrigerators, manufacturing other company's products/parts, PCs, BadaPhones, dumbPhones, toothpaste etc. so don't think their total profit is from android.
Now why, oh why can't we have that for medicine. Non-competes absolutely destroy doctors' ability to practice in the best way they see fit."Non-competes" are illegal in California for public companies. Period.
Samsung alone sells more smartphones than Apple:
Image
Add ZTE, HTC and others, and it's quite clear what makes more profit...
Samsung alone sells more smartphones than Apple:
Image
Add ZTE, HTC and others, and it's quite clear what makes more profit...
Yeah, until you use an iPad and flip it from portrait to landscape and find that the icon that used to be the leftmost of the second row is now the rightmost of the first.
Personally I hate organizing apps in folders because I tend to forget I even have them, I want all icons upfront and I don't mind flicking sideways between home screens, but I'd like to be able to have rows of 2 or 3 in order to keep categories of apps separated, and to reserve room for future apps in that category instead of having the whole system fall like dominoes every time I have to insert a new app.
I know companies have them to protect their investment IP. If there was not a no compete clause employee X could simply take all he knows and help company X's competitor. Employee X had a job and chose to leave so why let him/her take those talents (possibly earned while at company X, causing them to put a lot of time and money into their training) to another company and possibly hurt company X? NOW if company X fires employee X why should they be able to stop them from taking their talents to another company. That's my thinking on the subject.