Nothing. If that product was actually getting cheaper and made better by allowing unfettered competition to work.What's embarrassing about buying a product that works and works well?
You misspelled "sues".Apple sells well for a reason...
Nothing. If that product was actually getting cheaper and made better by allowing unfettered competition to work.What's embarrassing about buying a product that works and works well?
You misspelled "sues".Apple sells well for a reason...
So, poor people are allowed to mislead (lie), but corporations can't? That's a bit absurd.
All advertising is somewhat deceptive. That's been the norm for generations. On the basic level, ads try to convince you that you need a product that you don't really need.
I haven't consumed a TV commercial in years. Plus, since I'm blind, I don't get to see all the stupid annoying ads on the web. It's lovely. But even if I was sighted, I wouldn't give much thought to ads, at least I would hope not. I would like to think that I have self-control
(Credit: Josh Cohen)
________________________
You're exactly like me, I have a Note, but generally prefer IOS! To be honest, I am only on the thread to discuss the advert in reality. I don't follow most of arguments that the list is meaningless, i.e. most of the Top 10 Apple mentioned in their own keynote, so clearly important enough for them to highlight. So the remainder is somewhat "pointless", but were there to keep the advert at the forefront of the discussion - certainly succeeded on that score. Most features are "pointless" or "no use" if you have no access to them...rather like the truth is often what people choose to believe, rather than actually the truth. No axe to grind with you; your points on android fragmentation are largely accurate.
In reality of course this existed long before on ios an android. Apple copied just as much
Raw nerve...they did what you describe by spouting technical specifications..that apparently "don't matter" unless Apple use them.
we can agree to disagree. I am not going to lose sleep over your opinion.
Yay a fair comparison!
My only criticism of this is that "auto adjust brightness" is not the same as Smart Stay. Smart Stay causes the screen to stay on while you're looking at it. There is NO comparable iOS feature.
Why does it have an already outdated version of Android.
Whilst true, it's a null argument IMO. iPhones get a minimum of two years of decent upgrades.
A 3GS, whilst a painful experience for nerds like me and probably you, is still a passably decent phone that is reasonably comparable to modern phones and can probably run (not necessarily that well) lots of apps on the App Store.
Please show me an Android phone from 2009 that can do the same! (Don't factor in via custom roms, we're talking Joe Schmoe here).
Well, if you get copied a lot, you need to defend your turf a lot. Plus, it isn't just Apple going after Android. Microsoft has threatened legal action in order to extract some pretty hefty royalties from the likes of HTC and Samsung.
While I like the size of the S3, the screen seems a little dull, dark, and lacking the viewing angles of an iPhone. I've also heard users complain it eats through a charge far too quickly. Thoughts?
What a way for a technology company to get its word out! Newspapers!?!?!? Great move, Samsung. Try skywriting next time.
Question...how much does the software hold you back using the Note? I'm likely migrating to the Note 2 from iOS, and the software is my concern. I've yet to use an Android device that didn't either suffer from poor performance (stuttering, delayed recognition of touch, crashing) or crappy/unintuitive UI. That said, Android is getting better and I really like the idea of a big screen and a stylus (old fan of Palm Pilots back in the day).
Apple has never bashed any of its competitors in public. They even admit in public that some of other's products are excellent (MS Office for OSX) while it is competing with their own products.
It is said that Samsung behaves as a bad looser, a company of that size and standing should know and act better.
- NFC is not safe
- Gimmick features
I seem to remember when the antenna issue arose of the "4" the keynote seemed to spend the whole time, telling everyone why their competitors antennas were crap too? There not to shabby at dishing it out on Adobe either?
More like
Apple: Sues over anything
Samsung s3 vs iPhone 5
- NFC is not safe