Sunspider is a java web browser/script benchmark it is so not even close to real world testing its not even funny.
Um yes it is. It very closely mimics common Javascript actions. As far as web browser performance is concerned, Sunspider has been widely accepted in the industry as a good indicator of browser performance and Javascript compliance.
You can get 5 different results using different web browsers on android and the best browser on android for that bench is the stock OEM Samsung browser.it beats chrome and anything else but you are comparing different platform broswers with each other.
Yep, each of them handle Javascript in their own way. Maybe I'm biased but I've always preferred WebKit. On my Android phones I'd always stick with Browser (pre-Chrome) and Chrome for that reason. Dunno, they just seem to hiccup less. You say Samsung's browser scores best? Samsung's been known to mess around with the clocks when some benchmarks are detected, so...
The only true way to use sunspider would be to bench them using the same browser to bench wich CPU is better and I like how you now bring up cores.
But Apple will never release Safari nor its Nitro engine to Android..obviously. They clearly figured something out that Google still hasn't. I'm not entirely sure why Android's always been behind in Javascript/browsers in general. Could be a Dalvik thing? I don't know for sure.
Either way, Apple and Samsung both have had their best shot to come up with the best browser they can. That's the whole point of this discussion: Apple clearly found some tricks that Samsung didn't. Using Apple's browser on the Note 4 is kind of like comparing my Audi RS6 with your BMW M3 except we both use a Cadillac twin-turbo V8. Sorry for the car analogy, but they've both had their chance to make the best browser possible and one clearly came out on top, especially given the hardware limitations.
Please tell me Mr how many GPU cores the iphones 6 plus has? Is it 1,2,3,4 or 6? Cores don't matter right?
4. I THINK the Note 4 has 16, but I haven't been able to confirm that yet.
Exynos was never about 8 power cores and was made for power efficiency using big little.
To be honest, aside from the somewhat impressive architecture, Exynos variants almost always kind of sucked compared to its North American variants. I think the Note 4's the first Exynos-wielding phone where both variants kinda come close.
Oh, and about that "more RAM means less reloading" thing, I'm sorry but
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCln9_mgZJo
I know it's an S5, but it's still double the RAM of the iPhone 6. With the extra resolution of the Note 4...I'm going to go ahead and guesstimate that the Note 4 won't be dramatically better than the S5 in this regard.
About the Note Edge pushing 720p thing...that's kind of what I'd prefer Samsung does from now on to be honest. Sure, brighter bigger screens are really nice..but absolutely nobody needed the resolution bump from the Note 3 to the Note 4. I wish they kept the pixels around 400PPI while bumping the hardware. Now we see what happens when the resolution isn't ridiculously high: phones like the Note Edge start being serious contenders with their performance. The question is: where is the line drawn between "a tiny bit sharper under a microscope" and "plays games and runs benchmarks way faster."