The jet black aluminum is better looking And hundreds cheaper.The Slate Titanium is what I’m using, and it’s pretty near black. Not as dark as Jet Black or the old SS Space Black, but you have to look pretty closely to see the difference.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Series 10 Jet Black aluminum=scratch city?
- Thread starter Isaiah408
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yes the jet black is cheaper down to inferior materials. Paying full price for the titanium is not worth it best option is to go for a series 9 or Series 8 ST/ST when they’re on Sale at Costco. Paid £249 for my series 8 S/S the series 9 S/S can be had for £399. The sapphire glass on these watches is pretty much scratch resistant and will still look like new a few years down the road. The resale value will also be much higher when you’re ready to change it.
It’s a little off topic about the scratches but I find it very interesting that in Romania the colour is called ‘Diamond Black’, not ‘Jet Black’.
During the iPhone 7 days it was called ‘Jet Black’ here as well so at first I was under the impression they renamed it to ‘diamond’ due to the bad rep Jet Black had with its poor finish quality.
All other Apple Watches have their name as in English. Check out this screenshot from apple.ro comparing SE Miezul Noptii (Midnight) with S10 Negru Diamant (Diamond Black).
During the iPhone 7 days it was called ‘Jet Black’ here as well so at first I was under the impression they renamed it to ‘diamond’ due to the bad rep Jet Black had with its poor finish quality.
All other Apple Watches have their name as in English. Check out this screenshot from apple.ro comparing SE Miezul Noptii (Midnight) with S10 Negru Diamant (Diamond Black).
Attachments
Well I can confirm after wearing mine a month, they don’t scratch easily. Sure if you whack it into a brick wall you’ll see damage but not in general use. Knocked mine on furniture by accident and no damage. It’s £300 cheaper than a titanium model so well worth the risk I say.
@The-Real-Deal82 give it 6-12 months it will get scratches that's guaranteed
You would have better off getting the series 9 Stainless Steel for £399 from Costco
You would have better off getting the series 9 Stainless Steel for £399 from Costco
I had to return my slate titanium watch because it couldn't be paired with my 16 Pro. Because the titanium was not available for weeks I ended up with the jet black aluminum. The new watch I've had for several weeks has no scratches and the only difference I notice is the decrease in weight. It looks pretty much the same as the titanium.
Why would I have been better off? I was well aware I could get last year’s Series 9 and didn’t want a stainless watch, thanks.
Also don’t give a toss if I do get scratches, my Series 5 lasted five years and was scratched. Who cares?
Sorry to hear. Same thing happened with my jet black series 10 and thankfully I noticed it on the last day of the return window. Exchanged it for a slate titanium one.
Ouch, that is an expensive replacement.Exchanged it for a slate titanium one.
Yeah, a $200 premium to be exact. Was coming from an old series 6 stainless with a sapphire display that didn't have any scratches after all those years, so that was a selling point in justifying the exchange too.
Each to their own. I do mind scratches and I am a bit of a klutz managing to bang my watch into doorways and door knobs and whatnot.
The couple of times I bought aluminum I was eager to upgrade as soon as the next model came out; after switching to SBSS (and later SBTi) I generally skipped a model since the case & display remained pristine. As such the £230 / $230 difference is offset by less frequent upgrades.
After many years of swapping between SS and aluminium watches I still often buy the aluminium over the SS because of the price. Loving the jet black and mine still looks brand new.
That is fair enough. I used to wear some quite expensive mechanical watches before I got an Apple watch so am used to not bashing my watches into thimgs too often, although it does happen. I am just subconsciously careful overall.
For me an Apple Watch is a disposible gadget and one I wear for 4 or 5 years only, so I don't value paying £700+ for a smartwatch, especially when the aluminium model does the same thing. I've had 2 aluminium AW's previously, a Series 2 which I wore for 3 years and a Series 5 that I wore for 5 years, both were more than up to the job and durability was not an issue.
I know, that's why Im considering Care+ for itThe low cost one doesn't have sapphire glass
Same is true for pretty much any electronic device. Smart watches, smart phones, computers, tablets, etc. They all have a finite usable lifespan, and we each must balance the cost of ownership of successive replacements against the value that ownership provides. And that's a calculation unique to each individual.