Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Should I leave apple ecosystem in light of CSAM?

AJACs3 said:
On device scanning has existed since the beginning. Your email, your text messages, the contents of your files, faces in photos… that’s how searching for things on the phone works… everything you might want to find is scanned, indexed, and counted. So I’m not sure how you would have a useful computer if it didn’t scan and index your information.
Click to expand...
LMAO!!!
Not like this.
On device scanning for illegal material.
A scanner that is invisible to the user, scans, reports violations to authorities.

Kindly show me where else this exists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zakarhino, Mendota, turbineseaplane and 1 other person
dk001 said:
Despite the rhetoric, the on device scan that Apple is trying does little to clean the iCloud CSAM issue. Kind of like filtering toilet water. All the previous crap is still there. Untouched.
Click to expand...

I agree that Apple do not need to do this on the device. Further, their safeguards of having at least 30 confirmed CSAM pieces for an alarm to be triggered and the possibility of disabling everything by turning off iCloud Photos kind of defeats the purpose of the whole scheme. It seems to be ill-designed from the start, so I am wondering what kind of “rethinking” and changes Apple are going to come up with now.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jettie1767, Mendota, dk001 and 1 other person
OK a question for those that left but are still here.

What did you replace Apple services with that provides you with end to end availability of access to messaging, photo’s , documents, calendar , passwords, bookmarks etc etc across all your new devises, desktop, tablet , mobile, watch.

How is the new service mare secure and provide you with more privacy than what Apple currently provides?
I only know one person moved to Linux, but they just provides the desktop and no cloud services.

I’m genially interested to see what people implemented to replace hardware and cloud and how it compares.
 
Well the issue here is that Apple is doing this on device, Apple turns iCloud on by default, and Apple does not provide a way to exclude or actively choose the photos you want uploaded to iCloud. E.g. if you use Onedrive, you can choose what you want to upload or not. E.g. stuff that could lead to industry espionage or privacy issues, you can simply exclude. Or you can choose to upload the kitty videos, but not the striptease of your GF.

With Apple’s iCloud its “all on” on nothing, thats why i go for “nothing”.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jettie1767, dk001 and eltoslightfoot
keeper said:
OK a question for those that left but are still here.

What did you replace Apple services with that provides you with end to end availability of access to messaging, photo’s , documents, calendar , passwords, bookmarks etc etc across all your new devises, desktop, tablet , mobile, watch.

How is the new service mare secure and provide you with more privacy than what Apple currently provides?
I only know one person moved to Linux, but they just provides the desktop and no cloud services.

I’m genially interested to see what people implemented to replace hardware and cloud and how it compares.
Click to expand...
I gave up on all that stuff. Everyone scans in the cloud, so I made my own cloud. I shut off location and carefully checked permissions on Android 12 (Pixel 5a). I only turn location on when I need it. removed all telemetry from Windows 10 on my gaming PC and my surface pro.

The thing is my personal cloud does allow me to share files Dropbox style and automatically move photos into it. So I get close, but it's mine.

For watch, I use a galaxy active 2, but I shut off all location use, and give it no access. I don't even use the health settings except on the watch. Then again I wouldn't do that anymore on the Apple side after going to privacy.apple.com.

For bookmarks, I use firefox sync. It works great. For passwords I use bitwarden and pay for the sync $12 a year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mendota, dk001 and Wildkraut
eltoslightfoot said:
…
For watch, I use a galaxy active 2, but I shut off all location use, and give it no access. I don't even use the health settings except on the watch. Then again I wouldn't do that anymore on the Apple side after going to privacy.apple.com.

For bookmarks, I use firefox sync. It works great. For passwords I use bitwarden and pay for the sync $12 a year.
Click to expand...

I too was very surprised when id the privacy check on both of my Apple accounts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eltoslightfoot
FreedomPenguin said:
You have a freedom to go to the peasant system Android too. No ones stopping ya.
I don’t care about this program. Let it catch some predators, no ***** given to me
Click to expand...
"Peasant system?" Okay, so you are one of those. I have news for you, owning certain products does not make you a superior person. And if Android is so "peasant", why does Apple keep copying their features? Everything "new" that shows up on Apple came first in Android. If this feature works the way Apple claims, it will catch fewer predators than systems used by others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eltoslightfoot
hans1972 said:
He seems to think it's bad to trust policy because it's easier to change. Well, it isn't difficult to change code either.

Personally, I have come to the conclusion several years ago that you can't have good privacy without good policy. Trusting technology won't work. Therefore I only choose companies in which I trust and have a good policy.
Click to expand...
Checkout the idea of trustless architecture. Basically, build systems and technology where you cannot trust policies. This is where E2EE works for example, you assume everyone else is a potential attacker. Just send "noise" through the internet pipes, who cares what they do to it because it's encrypted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eltoslightfoot and dk001
hans1972 said:
The CSAM Detection system is inefficient for being misused by powerful governments. There are many other technologies in the iPhone already which are much better suited for surveillance of the population or finding people with unpopular opinions.

If I was living in a country where I considered the government my enemy, the CSAM Detection System would be quite low on my list of worries.

Also I live in a country without an oppressive government. In fact, I trust all three branches of government for the most port including the police. I trust my phone company, my bank, my insurance company, my neighbours and even most strangers.
Click to expand...
I advocate for trustless systems on behalf of others who do not have these things. Journalists, whistleblowers, citizens in impoverished nations. Life is pretty sweet for me, and I want others to have the same if they so desire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eltoslightfoot, dk001 and Mendota
one more said:
I get it, but why so much mistrust? I mean, a simple hammer or scissors can cause a lot of harm if misused. Craig’s interview indeed did sound somewhat apologetic to me and the journalist could also have asked him some more interesting questions, starting from why could not Apple scan the iCloud contents to begin with, instead of choosing to do it on the devices themselves? It would still serve their intended purpose, but would probably have less resistance. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Click to expand...
You are #400 posts into one of many threads on this. Sorry about the confusion, go check out the discussions there. It's been discussed repeatedly, so I'll spare you and others from repeating it again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eltoslightfoot and dk001
There seems to be a buzz that iCloud backups are not e2e encrypted, but Apple’s site says iCloud backups are so: https://support.apple.com/en-gb/HT202303

What am I missing?

EDIT: found a link explaining my mis-understanding: https://macmost.com/forum/how-to-achieve-end-to-end-encryption-on-icloud-drive.html

Sigh. Really had high hopes for Apple stance on privacy, and some things are great (e.g., Safari anti-tracking enhancements, Private Relay, etc.), but looks like I’ll need to find a new place for my sensitive docs than iCloud Drive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mendota, crymimefireworks, eltoslightfoot and 1 other person
About the "you can just turn it off if you don't like it" argument regarding CSAM and Photos/iMessage, I've had iMessage turn itself on three times in the past week or so, twice on iPhone and once on iPad. I know I turned it off both in iCloud settings and in Messages in the Settings app, but this is consistent with Apple's performance software-wise. Imagine how well the actual CSAM technology will work!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mendota and crymimefireworks
How would the ”ecosystem” work, when you turn off everything syncing via icloud? It doesnt work at all, so whats the point having ”ecosystem”?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mendota
Yes, if you have something to hide or are high profile politician. Otherwise there is no impact for regular folks. N o n e.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lee_Bo
Octavius8 said:
Yes, if you have something to hide or are high profile politician. Otherwise there is no impact for regular folks. N o n e.
Click to expand...

Try reading these and tell me if your stance is still the same.
Thx.

cdt.org

In Letter to Apple CEO, 90+ Organizations Urge Tim Cook to Scrap Plans to Weaken Digital Privacy and Security

(WASHINGTON)—-A coalition of more than 90 U.S. and international organizations dedicated to civil rights, digital rights, and human rights today sent a letter to Apple CEO Tim Cook urging Apple to abandon its plans to build surveillance capabilities into its iPhones, iPads, and other products...
cdt.org cdt.org

9to5mac.com

German parliament pens letter to Tim Cook with concerns over CSAM detection system - 9to5Mac

The Digital Agenda committee chief of the German parliament wants Apple to reconsider its CSAM plans in a letter to Tim Cook.
9to5mac.com 9to5mac.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mendota, PBz and crymimefireworks
Octavius8 said:
Yes, if you have something to hide or are high profile politician. Otherwise there is no impact for regular folks. N o n e.
Click to expand...

Or if you’re asking in a public forum if you should leave Apple, then maybe you should.

Bottom line is we can give you 1000 reasons to stay and 1000 reasons to leave. YOU have to make the choice.

For me, no worries. All Apple will see are several TB’s of wildlife and landscape photos.
 
Lee_Bo said:
Or if you’re asking in a public forum if you should leave Apple, then maybe you should.

Bottom line is we can give you 1000 reasons to stay and 1000 reasons to leave. YOU have to make the choice.

For me, no worries. All Apple will see are several TB’s of wildlife and landscape photos.
Click to expand...
NO worries here either. Apple will see zero of anything since I have no personal apple devices any longer. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mendota
Lee_Bo said:
Or if you’re asking in a public forum if you should leave Apple, then maybe you should.

Bottom line is we can give you 1000 reasons to stay and 1000 reasons to leave. YOU have to make the choice.

For me, no worries. All Apple will see are several TB’s of wildlife and landscape photos.
Click to expand...
What about worries for journalists, whistleblowers, and political refugees around the world as this program grows and is manipulated by politicians?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mendota, eltoslightfoot and dk001
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back