Sorry, I was $50 off. I respect your opinion, but my opinion is that this thing isn't $300 better than an 8. The galaxy s8 (the comparable device, I don't go based on rumor and future releases) is $749. Beyond that there are constantly sales and deals on these devices, unlike iPhone. That's obviously a manufacturer/carrier setup, but the point is, I wouldn't be paying the $749 for it anyway. Maybe a couple hundred dollar difference doesn't matter to you, or others. That's perfectly fine. When looked at as a percentage increase, it isn't nothing. In business, fractions of a percent matter. Here we are talking well north of 10%. Just trying to keep it in perspective.iPhone 8 = $700 ($300 difference)
iPhone 8 Plus = $800 ($200 difference)
Galaxy S9 = $800-$850 (rumored) ($150-$200 difference)
Galaxy S9+ = $900-$950 (rumored) ($100-$50 difference)
Galaxy Note 8 = $950 ($50 difference)
iPhone X = $999
I don't see the X as being that far from the new normal as far as major brand flagships and pricing goes. I do think the X is $100 overpriced though. I think $899 is about right for it and if it were priced there maybe there would be less hate.
How long have you owned the X?
For the record, I don't find the stainless steel apple watch to be worth the premium either. Unfortunately it is the only way to get the nearly impossible to scratch screen. I'd much more happily drop $100 over base just for the screen. Ofc ourse, Apple knows very well what they're doing.
[doublepost=1518828499][/doublepost]
Maybe. IDK. Never tried one. Personally I am also comparing Apple's other models. I can put this another way. OMOLED screen and face ID aren't worth $300 to me. I've kept it long enough that it's mine now, and I am nowhere near as disappointed as I was with the 6 plus (that was the worst iPhone I have ever used; others are still using it and reporting it's great).Is a BMW 5 Series worth $20,000 more than a Honda Accord which is the same size and moves the same amount of passengers on the same roads from Point A to Point B?
The answer is in the brand image, the product styling, and the functional details. To many, the X is worth every penny of the $350 difference in that context.
Is the screen gorgeos? Sure. Is faceID awesome? Arguable; it works very well for me, except in the car, which is a bit of a bother since I have my phone on a mount and swap music that way. It is more of a distraction than previous phones were. Irregardless of what tech is in the thing, I base the value I put into an item in its utility to me. I can honestly say it is only situationally better than TouchID, and while I am impressed with it, it wasn't at all a selling point.
I am well aware it's worth it for some folks... I was sharing my opinion, which I think I made very clear, and was adding to the discourse. I am not sure what the purpose of responding to my opinion (again, clearly labeled as such) with telling me other find it worth it is? Never denied that.
[doublepost=1518828653][/doublepost]
Absolutely. That's exactly why I made it clear that this was my opinion, and not an overall law of the land. To be honest I am surprised I got so many responses lol. People respond as if I am saying the phone is a ripoff and not worth it and that we are al fools for having bought one.. When you clearly explain your statement is based on your own experiences, I don't know that I could be any more clear that this is a personal opinion and preference.The thing is, there’s no other device on the market at present that you can compare with the iPhone X. The display and face detection technology alone is worth the extra money. But again, that’s a personal opinion / choice. “Worth” is always relative.
It's a great phone that I spent more money on than I should have, which I will keep in mind moving forward, assuming this is how flagship iPhone prices remain.
Last edited: