I was going to buy a Macbook Air for coffee table surfing. SJ just saved me a thousand bucks.
At least the Air is a COMPUTER. The iPad is a large Touch. Hardly comparable. What do they share in common? ANSWER: the Apple logo.
It truly seems that the general opinions are rather negative - be it on engadget, digg or even here.
The worst thing is however when ppl begin to hate on ppl who actually find the iPad quite neat. That's extremely poor taste.
This device has turned out exactly how I expected it to be. Sleek and nothing revolutionary. It will sell just like the Air, in other words quite respectably.
I bet its going to turn like with awesome movies. Piss poor reviews but amazing sales figures.It truly seems that the general opinions are rather negative - be it on engadget, digg or even here.....
I bet its going to turn like with awesome movies. Piss poor reviews but amazing sales figures.
I bet its going to turn like with awesome movies. Piss poor reviews but amazing sales figures.
I just want multitasking.
I bought a Mac mini as my main machine and media centre, it works perfectly as both. My iPhone is my mobile device and it works great. However there is times (actually most of the time) that I want a bigger screen on my iPhone. I would like to edit documents in Pages at school, surf the web on the couch with a screen bigger than 3.5". The MB/MBP cost too much to be that middle device. I did not buy a notebook to begin with because I wanted my main machine to also double as a media centre. The iPad hits thatsweet spot between those devices with right price. I just want multitasking.
Well, you aren't gonna get it, so what are you gonna do? Buy one anyway and live with?
I meant you aren't going to get multitasking! (oh my, reading comprehension failure, even after I quoted the salient part of your post...)How do you know this?
I meant you aren't going to get multitasking! (oh my, reading comprehension failure, even after I quoted the salient part of your post...)
Can´t do anything serious that MacBook Pro with full OS X can.
Well not everyone has an MB. All I have is a Mac mini. But I've been needing a portable device that is more than an iPhone for a long time now. The iPad will be perfect for me. I just have no wish to spend $1000 for an MB or more for MBP. I have been amazed at all the negative postings. It looks to me like the iPad is a great device at a great price. I think there are many, many people out there who have been thinking about getting a netbook but will now look at the iPad. I plan on ordering one just as soon as it is available.
Then allow me to simplify the reasons why people are rightfully bashing it..
- No multi-tasking. Yes, the iPhone didn't have it either, but that's still forgiveable as the iPhone only has a 3.5" screen (though even Palm somehow managed it on a smaller screen..), but on a 10" screen? Having to quite Pages each time to use Safari or any other app is just stupid....
- No Flash. Sure, Flash is an annoyance on many websites, but it is essential on many others. Like many have said, even the NYT website that Jobs demoed had crippled flash on it.. A simple flash "on/off" slider wouldn't kill them, rather than them deciding that one wouldn't want it...
- No Webcam. This isn't a huge deal, but its a bit of a strange omission as having one would make absolute sense in every possible way.. But the fact that they still won't make an iChat iPhone app sort of speaks for the omission of this feature really....
- No Full OS X. These apps could easily have been apps made for full-on OS X a la FrontRow or Plex.. The processor should be more than capable of handling it (it has similar specs to the nVidia Tegra 2 platform) and really Apple is restricting the potential of this new processor by simply releasing a tweaked iPhone OS. They were working on this for years and all they came up with was a skinned iPhone OS? Please...
- HD on a non-HD screen. Touting Youtube HD or HD H264 video playback as a feature on a screen with a non-HD resolution makes no sense.
- eBooks. While its great they are including an eBook store, you cannot honestly compare an IPS screen to an E-ink screen for a better reading experience. It'll be good, but Jobs seems to think he has revolutionised it somehow......
I meant you aren't going to get multitasking! (oh my, reading comprehension failure, even after I quoted the salient part of your post...)
How did you come to this conclusion?
I want one to replace my Kindle. It will cost slightly 2x more, but it will do about 140,000 things that the Kindle can't.
RE: multi-tasking, I think it will get it when the iPhone does. The iPad is running OS 3.2, not 4.0
The webcam makes no ergonomic sense to me. A cam like the iPhone's (for snapping pics or videos), perhaps. But nobody's going to hold the freaking iPad up level with their face for 15 minutes to video chat. And laying the pad in any other position isn't going to give you a workable angle for video chat.
Your thought about HD makes me think that you'd find "no sense" in watching a 1080p show on a 720p TV set.
+1and while I love the additional functionality provided by multitasking, not having it isn't a deal-breaker for me.
+1
I don't think anyone is against it having multitasking, but the way I will use this device, the lack of it isn't a show-stopper.
Does anyone really think that multi-tasking won't be coming in a future OS update?
That sounds cool, but I just don't see a Dr. standing there, using both hands to hold the iPad up at his face and keeping the damn thing steady for a 10 minute consultation.Think about the medical field - if im a dr. and have an office thats needs to make the mandatory e-switch in 2011, wouldnt it be nice to get to talk to mr. aristobrat's primary care dr face to face on my iPad? i could see xrays and share the screen with another dr to discuss it...
I have an iPhone. I have the Kindle app on my iPhone, giving me access to all of my Kindle books. The screen is entirely too small for my liking. Both for the Kindle, for watching TV shows, and for surfing the web.If you have an iPhone, how does the iPad cover more bases in a cost effective manner than a kindle?