Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

macjram

macrumors 6502a
Dec 20, 2008
574
3
You know I was wondering about that too. Everbody copies Apple. I guess because nobody else has slightest amount of creativity in them. So they just copy Apple. It makes me so mad that I want to eat 20 banana's in a row, stare at the dancing icons on my dock and then finally wish everyone who copied Apple would grow tails.
Thanks.

Apple copied Sony, actually.

Lol....
 

Sehnsucht

macrumors 65816
Sep 21, 2008
1,165
0
I like the way the keyboard looks...the thing doesn't look half-bad in terms of design...but the specs! 1.33GHz??!!! Seriously why are 1-point-anything-GHz processors still around (Sony VAIO P, Acer Aspire One, Mac Mini, MacBook Air)???!!! 1.33GHz plus 2GB of RAM? Those specs are from 2003...there is no way. :eek:
 

coupdetat

macrumors 6502
Jul 11, 2008
451
0
I like the way the keyboard looks...the thing doesn't look half-bad in terms of design...but the specs! 1.33GHz??!!! Seriously why are 1-point-anything-GHz processors still around (Sony VAIO P, Acer Aspire One, Mac Mini, MacBook Air)???!!! 1.33GHz plus 2GB of RAM? Those specs are from 2003...there is no way. :eek:

Wow, you have no idea what you're talking about, do you? Go back to your 3ghz P4, okay?
 

Dmac77

macrumors 68020
Jan 2, 2008
2,165
3
Michigan
I like the way the keyboard looks...the thing doesn't look half-bad in terms of design...but the specs! 1.33GHz??!!! Seriously why are 1-point-anything-GHz processors still around (Sony VAIO P, Acer Aspire One, Mac Mini, MacBook Air)???!!! 1.33GHz plus 2GB of RAM? Those specs are from 2003...there is no way. :eek:

It's a netbook. They're not going to have 2 GHz Core2Duo Processors in them. Netbooks are meant for internet browsing, email, and office applications. Those specs are perfectly fine for that kind of stuff.

Don
 

twoodcc

macrumors P6
Feb 3, 2005
15,307
26
Right side of wrong
i like it. i think the price is a little high for me though, or i would seriously consider getting it.

does it use a normal 2.5" SATA hard drive? if so, i might consider getting it and just upgrading the hard drive myself
 

NoSmokingBandit

macrumors 68000
Apr 13, 2008
1,579
3
Put it at 599, and maybe you'd have a sale(if it was OS X, I'm sold) but 900 is just to much, there are plenty of other netbooks with fine resolutions,and nice designs.


Though its nice to have someone filling this role in the market.

If it were $599 and could run osx86 i would buy one as soon as i could.
 

coupdetat

macrumors 6502
Jul 11, 2008
451
0
i like it. i think the price is a little high for me though, or i would seriously consider getting it.

does it use a normal 2.5" SATA hard drive? if so, i might consider getting it and just upgrading the hard drive myself

Very unlikely... it's probably got the same 1.8" drives found in the MBA and Vaio TT.
 

Marx55

macrumors 68000
Jan 1, 2005
1,945
775
Any tutorial out there to make the Sony Vaio P-series Lifestyle PC to boot as Mac OS X for Keynote and PowerPoint 2004 presentations?

Apple, you are missing the boat! The MacBook Air is too large and too heavy. And too limited on ports too!!!
 

gotzero

macrumors 68040
Jan 6, 2007
3,225
2
Mid-Atlantic, US
I want to try out the input device, but I think the screen resolution and size may have sold me. It comes close to the 15" MBP for number of pixels. The small size means it could fit upright in the one of the secondary pockets of a bag.

The keyboard also looks much better than most of the netbooks. I want to see it first, but after a long break I may be getting another Vaio.
 

dogtanian

macrumors 6502
Jun 26, 2007
379
0
Bournemouth, UK
The green model (RRP: £750) was just on Amazon for £300 misprice. No way they will honour that when push comes to shove though. Still placed my order just in case!
 

Habakuk

macrumors 6502a
Jul 10, 2007
968
40
Vienna Austria Europe
For those who believe Sony makes good computers:

I had a huge 16,1" Sony Vaio GRX 316G (2,700 Euro) before I switched. On the very day when the manufacturer's guarantee ended the CD/DVD drive stopped working. One year later one of the RAM banks got loose (soldering; a common known GRX/GRT/GRS-series fault but never acknowledged by Sony).

Four years after purchase the LCD backlight was kaputt. Estimated repair costs: 600 Euro, has to be sent to France (6-9 weeks). The Sony software is crap. The pre-installed and bloated Norton crap and "antivirus"-apps slowed down the system significantly. The power adapter is about six times larger and heavier than Apple's. The device was loud. The battery was on 60 % after one year and on 20 % after three years (replacement: 250 Euro). Compared to MBP the whole system was instable. When I tried to wake up (not booting) the Vaio it needed up to three minutes until you have full power. Wow.

A friend of mine has a smaller and cheaper Vaio since three years. 1.5 years after purchase the hard disk drive had to be changed. The extremely glossy screen is really hard to kept clean.

With my MBP I had a display change within 24 hours and a Main Logic Board change within 3 days (all under warranty) here in Vienna at the official Apple Service Provider just around the corner.
 

Sesshi

macrumors G3
Jun 3, 2006
8,113
1
One Nation Under Gordon
*prays quietly*

So when will Apple finally take some major clue (*cough* Blu-Ray *cough*) from Sony's VAIO line?

Apple copying build quality and product engineering that's not all hot air from Sony would also be nice.

But... I'm noticing some Apple-apeing negativity in terms of cost saving builds while fobbing off consumers who don't know better in the very latest VAIO's - although I have to say they still work a lot better than any Apple I've had recently.

I'm not hugely tempted by the P. Partly because I don't like trackpoints, but mostly because it's Vista running on an Atom - and I don't want to use XP whenever possible. I'd rather stick to my year+ old UX's which will be faster than possibly the fastest of the P's. It strikes me as a nice size to have especially when compared to my TT's and the UX's though. I think this is one VAIO I'd definitely have to try before I buy.
 

Digital Skunk

macrumors G3
Dec 23, 2006
8,100
930
In my imagination
Apple copying build quality and product engineering that's not all hot air from Sony would also be nice.

But... I'm noticing some Apple-apeing negativity in terms of cost saving builds while fobbing off consumers who don't know better in the very latest VAIO's - although I have to say they still work a lot better than any Apple I've had recently.

I'm not hugely tempted by the P. Partly because I don't like trackpoints, but mostly because it's Vista running on an Atom - and I don't want to use XP whenever possible. I'd rather stick to my year+ old UX's which will be faster than possibly the fastest of the P's. It strikes me as a nice size to have especially when compared to my TT's and the UX's though. I think this is one VAIO I'd definitely have to try before I buy.

I was pumped up by it too, but my issue with it is more the price. I could even learn to get used to the trackpoint, or even suck it up and bring a wireless mouse, but paying $1000 for it and it's supposed to be a netbook makes me have to really think about what the other options are.

I read on Engadget that the Windows 7 Beta actually ran on it a lot smoother than Vista. I would be more interested in running W7 on it, but I can't get over that trackpoint and price tag.

Though, I have been waiting for my time to own the TT. Moving up to that from the Air has me waiting another year to get it, so says the venerable wife.
 

twoodcc

macrumors P6
Feb 3, 2005
15,307
26
Right side of wrong
i think this laptop seems very nice. the price is a little high though, and like said before, if i got it, i'd have to update the hard drive. how hard to you think it would be to get a bigger hard drive and actually get it in the machine?
 

VoR

macrumors 6502a
Sep 8, 2008
917
15
UK
I seriously find it very hard to consider a laptop without a trackpoint :)

I've never used one from hp/sony etc, so I'm not sure how they compare.
 

Sesshi

macrumors G3
Jun 3, 2006
8,113
1
One Nation Under Gordon
I was pumped up by it too, but my issue with it is more the price. I could even learn to get used to the trackpoint, or even suck it up and bring a wireless mouse, but paying $1000 for it and it's supposed to be a netbook makes me have to really think about what the other options are.

I read on Engadget that the Windows 7 Beta actually ran on it a lot smoother than Vista. I would be more interested in running W7 on it, but I can't get over that trackpoint and price tag.

Though, I have been waiting for my time to own the TT. Moving up to that from the Air has me waiting another year to get it, so says the venerable wife.

Well - like anything you pay for portability. My UX's were about $3,000 each when I bought them in the US. The P is a ~600 gram machine with a very nifty form factor and premium Sony build quality instead of the plastickiness of most netbooks. To people who can't tell an Atom from a Penryn, it's a statement object too.

Let me be more specific about the new Sony's since you mention the TT. Part of me is regretting having changed wholesale from the TZ's to the TT's. I bought a mix of the 1.2 and 1.4 machines, it is a more advanced machine, the new CPU's do make it noticeably snappier especially on the lower models, runtime is decent and once you get used to the reduced pitch, the keyboard feels so much better for fast typing than the Air... but although it looks slightly better in styling terms, it definitely feels - and once you get past the superficial styling elements, looks - noticeably cheaper than the TZ.

So I'm not feeling the Sony love as much this time around - although of course, with nowhere near the ridiculous defects / lack of engineering sense of Apples it's still a better option.

The same could be said of the Z, despite the fact that it's arguably more of an engineering feat than even the TT. I really liked the SZ's performance in general and I think it looked very crisp and dignified. The Z, once again although it's a better machine in terms of hardware just doesn't feel as solid and look close-up as well built as the SZ did.

For me, the TT was a much more necessary purchase so I replaced all of my TZ's. I haven't had the same compunction, given my above qualms, to do the same for the SZ. So I still only have the Z's I bought to evaluate.

I was hoping for a direct descendant of the UX in a more keyboard-involved form, so I was disappointed that the P didn't have a touchscreen. Perhaps I'll replace my UX's when the next revision of the P comes out - but probably not this time. The P hasn't been clothed in 'carbon fiber' and I think it looks all the better for it. Carbon-reinforced plastic is in engineering terms a very good material for this purpose, but especially with the finish on the new flagship VAIO machines it looks chintzy.
 

gotzero

macrumors 68040
Jan 6, 2007
3,225
2
Mid-Atlantic, US
As dumb as this makes me look, I did not even notice they were not running XP. I just assumed because of the hardware specs.

I am definitely going to want to see one in person.
 

armoguy94

macrumors 6502
Nov 9, 2007
388
0
I LOVE the design. But I don't get why people here are complaining that the price is high, when they themselves purchase Macs.. isn't that a bit hypocritical?
 

SnowLeopard2008

macrumors 604
Jul 4, 2008
6,772
18
Silicon Valley
yeah, that's what i was afraid of. 60 GB just doesn't cut it for me.

It's a netbook (but not in terms of price), not a mac pro with 4 hard drive bays with 1TB each. 60GB is ample. It's designed for web browsing, email, etc. Maybe some word processing, powerpoints, etc.


Any tutorial out there to make the Sony Vaio P-series Lifestyle PC to boot as Mac OS X for Keynote and PowerPoint 2004 presentations?

Apple, you are missing the boat! The MacBook Air is too large and too heavy. And too limited on ports too!!!

You have no idea what you're talking about. The MBA is for ppl who want a ultra portable but still want some power. No netbook with any number of ports will match the MBA's power. Netbooks (and Sony P) all use the Atom SINGLE-core processor running at a LOWER clock speed. The MBA has a Core 2 Duo DUAL-core processor running at HIGHER clock speed.


I LOVE the design. But I don't get why people here are complaining that the price is high, when they themselves purchase Macs.. isn't that a bit hypocritical?

Macs are really cheap compared to the bloated POS that Dell/HP/Sony churns out each year. The Dell XPS One (AIO) and iMac (AIO) cost roughly the same, but the iMac has discrete graphics (ATI and nVidia) compared to the Dell's Intel GMA 4500HD.

The HP uses Intel GMAs (not sure about model) and you can only get the nVidia chipset when you buy the high end configuration. Notebooks are the same, Dell/HP/Sony all uses Intel GMAs unless you bump things past 1.7K.

MacBooks uses nVidia (which pwns any Intel GMA) for 1.5K (that's the high end 2.4GHz model too). Not to mention you can get educational discounts, free shipping, ships the same day, and the best customer service (wins awards year after year).

Oh did I mention how sucky Vista is to OS X? Or build quality? Ives godly designs? Plastic to Aluminum?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.