Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
WOW...up a buck. Funny how much people spend going out to eat/drink for a couple hours and don't think twice about it but bitch about $1 increase for listening to music for a whole month.

That's not really the point. If every subscription that people have in their lives goes up by a dollar, that adds up quickly.

Someone can opt out of a dinner out to save money, but trying to save on subscription usually means canceling them, which may come with penalties. The lock-in is why price increases can hurt.
 
At $11.99 and $19.99, respectively, the Spotify Premium and Family plans are now more expensive than the equivalent Apple Music plans. Apple's Individual plan is priced at $10.99 per month, while the Family plan is priced at $16.99 per month.
I don't know which executive at Spotify thought "let's make our services more expensive than the competition's, while still not offering Spatial Audio or lossless quality"

...but I wonder if they'll make the Surprised Pikachu Face when their customers leave? 🤡
 
Considering that Spotify and Apple Music are pretty much the only two companies that compete for streaming music, I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple matches this Spotify pricing in the near future

I currently have the Apple Music family plan and I’m paying only $10.00/m because I get my Apple Music family through Verizon as an add on and I’m really hoping that the $10/m that I pay never increases and that I am grandfathered in to only paying $10.00/m but we’ll have to see what ends up happening
 
  • Like
Reactions: xmach
Do you mean in terms of pay or audio fidelity? I'm no audiophile but I believe Tidal offers at least as high fidelity streaming as Apple Music, if not higher. In terms of payment per stream for artists, I think they offer roughly double what Apple does.
ok that makes sense, thank you :)
 
Considering that Spotify and Apple Music are pretty much the only two companies that compete for streaming music, I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple matches this Spotify pricing in the near future

I currently have the Apple Music family plan and I’m paying only $10.00/m because I get my Apple Music family through Verizon as an add on and I’m really hoping that the $10/m that I pay never increases and that I am grandfathered in to only paying $10.00/m but we’ll have to see what ends up happening
If I were Apple, I would keep Music at the current price and slowly starve Spotify out, but what do I know about business. :)
is there a reason i should care about this? artists still choose them so they must be fine with it....
And yet people complain about app developers getting only 70%/85% of proceeds, or the amount that Tim Cook is being paid.

It almost seems like facts only matter when they can be used to attack someone you don't like, but when they apply to your favourite company, then suddenly it becomes an inconvenient truth.

You are right in that a consumer probably doesn't have concern himself with how a company spends their funding, yet at the same time, you also have to wonder just where Spotify's money is going, what it means for the long-term sustainability of their business, and whether one might be better served by switching to Apple Music while the going is still good.

This is the company who on one hand has zero qualms about running to the EU regulators to complain about Apple, yet at the same time thinks nothing of stiffing music rights holders of their money (the inclusion of audiobooks means none of this $1 increase will go towards them). The hypocrisy here really could not be more stark, IMO.
 
I don't know which executive at Spotify thought "let's make our services more expensive than the competition's, while still not offering Spatial Audio or lossless quality"

...but I wonder if they'll make the Surprised Pikachu Face when their customers leave? 🤡

Not great for them to be more expensive that their competitors but the lossless/spatial audio thing isn't hurting them really.

The research says they have industry leading customer retention. They also had their best year for user growth last year despite Apple offering lossless.


 
Last edited:
I am nonplussed about the price hike obviously, but of all the apps on my devices - Spotify is the one I use the most, multiple times daily, on multiple devices - so frankly they could double the price and I'd probably still pay it. (but please don't Spotify)
 
I wonder if the EU will demand Apple charge more than Spotify so they do not have a competitive edge. Supposedly they could not make it when eating the 30%, then 15%, and then nothing. Next move is to raise prices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wbeasley
While Apple Music does pay slightly more than Spotify, it's still a drop in the ocean. None of the streaming services pay much to the artist, usually hundredths of a cent for each stream. So where is all the rest of the money going? Who knows? That's why artists who want to make a living at music have to tour. These days, it's the only way to make a living wage (unless you have the sales of Taylor Swift or Adele).
3 months of streaming is a drop in the ocean but everyone bashed apple for taking that away for the free trial
 
Actually it’s up two bucks in less than a year. That’s quite a hefty increase.

And it’s only going up from there.
I’m increasingly considering jumping ship from Spotify but I much prefer their UI to Apple Music. If Apple Music would offer a custom discounted services package rate along with my 6TB iCloud storage that would persuade me but I don’t see that happening. And before you ask, I don’t want all their other services, just AM and iCloud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rumz
Interesting point. Bloomberg published some research on user churn for popular streaming services.

Look at the enormous spike for Apple Music when they put the price up in October 2023 ! :oops:



1717461252564.png
 
I wonder if the EU will demand Apple charge more than Spotify so they do not have a competitive edge. Supposedly they could not make it when eating the 30%, then 15%, and then nothing. Next move is to raise prices.

You left out "Fire 1300 people and damage the quality of the service". https://finance.yahoo.com/news/spotify-ceo-shocked-negative-impact-164049736.html

Spotify is in trouble if they're sandwiching layoffs with price increases and whining about a regulatory environment they were born in.
 
I wonder if the EU will demand Apple charge more than Spotify so they do not have a competitive edge. Supposedly they could not make it when eating the 30%, then 15%, and then nothing. Next move is to raise prices.

I can think of no better way of demonstrating that the DMA was never intended to benefit consumers.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.