Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

Kung gu

Suspended
Oct 20, 2018
1,379
2,434
So performance will be worse or better on 8GB? I’m kind of confused with your comment on higher memory pressure.
sorry, I should have more clearer.

Performance will be the same, the M1 did not get slower but now swapping occurs less.

You see before 11.4 kernel_task was writing so much to the disk for no reason. Apple fixed that and also fixed the usage of excessive swap.

RAM usage on 11.4 will we like the intel models(i.e disk writes will be lower and swap will be normal and not crazy high). Don't worry the M1 performance is not impacted. The system will still feel snappy and quick.

As for memory pressure, well for normal tasks(web browsing, zoom, emails) 8GB is fine but heavy tasks like video editing or having a lot of apps open its best to opt for 16GB.

TLDR: 11.4 has better disk and RAM management. M1 performance is the same.
 
Last edited:

mi7chy

macrumors G4
Oct 24, 2014
10,623
11,296
So performance will be worse or better on 8GB? I’m kind of confused with your comment on higher memory pressure.

Sounds like explanation is implying that with 11.4 it's swapping to storage less to reduce excessive SSD writes while using more RAM so worse for those with 8GB. Maybe write Tim Cook to see if you can exchange and pay the difference for 16GB model since the fix for the OS bug made the 8GB model worse.
 

CMMChris

macrumors 6502a
Oct 28, 2019
850
794
Germany (Bavaria)
Performance will be the same, the M1 did not get slower but now swapping occurs less.
Unlikely. Moving from swap to available RAM increases performance due to the higher bandwidth of the RAM. That is underlined by the fact that a lot of people say that 11.4 feels significantly smoother compared to 11.3. And I actually have that feeling as well.

Sounds like explanation is implying that with 11.4 it's swapping to storage less to reduce excessive SSD writes while using more RAM so worse for those with 8GB.
For those with the swapping issue there has never been an issue with a lack of RAM. RAM pressure mostly was green despite the heavy writes to the SSD / excessive swapping. The machine now using the available RAM instead of the swap is beneficial.
 

mi7chy

macrumors G4
Oct 24, 2014
10,623
11,296
So, can anyone confirm that 11.4 finally fixes the SSD issue for sure?

Too soon to tell. Give it at least a week which is about how long it'll take for me to retest extended sleep that I saw used up all 16GB RAM then created a swap file with only one browser tab opened.
 

Chancha

macrumors 68020
Mar 19, 2014
2,313
2,141
As a 8GB Air owner I would be bumped if this fix means less performance for my use cases. Something has to give, if the previous state of M1/Big Sur was to sacrifice SSD tear in exchange for performance in swap, this fix could mean the bottlenecking is being put back to physical RAM amount. Fingers crossed.
 

featherlessbird

macrumors newbie
Feb 16, 2021
29
24
The SSD writes are much lower on 11.4, but the issue isn't completely fixed for me. I'm still seeing about 1TB of kernel_task writes a day if I don't reboot my Mac for a couple of days. The same on 11.5 beta. No difference in performance though.
 

tollickd

macrumors regular
Jan 10, 2010
118
71
I do hope 11.4 has resolved the main culprit of the issue. Noting more frustrating than seeing the Memory Pressure 50% or less sometimes and the OS dumps straight to the swap! I have ram use it OS!!!!
 

Kung gu

Suspended
Oct 20, 2018
1,379
2,434
The SSD writes are much lower on 11.4, but the issue isn't completely fixed for me. I'm still seeing about 1TB of kernel_task writes a day if I don't reboot my Mac for a couple of days. The same on 11.5 beta. No difference in performance though.
What were your SSD writes prior to 11.4?

1TB kernel_task writes is definitely not normal. Maybe do a fresh install of macOS.
 
Last edited:

IceStormNG

macrumors 6502a
Sep 23, 2020
517
676
Are you sure it's caused by swapping? kernel_task does a lot more than just swapping.

You could try to temporarily disable swap completely and look whether it changes your writes. If not, then your issue is not caused by swapping but something else.

3TB and even 1TB a day seems excessive. Assuming 8h per day, it would be about 2GB per minute or 125GB per hour (at 1TB per day).
 

Kung gu

Suspended
Oct 20, 2018
1,379
2,434
Over 3TB a day. I've tried reinstalling the OS a couple of times but it didn't help.
oh my. So 11.4 removed 2TB writes per day. Nice.

If you don't mind me asking what apps do you run your Mac?

Is it heavy workloads then I would say 11.4 has done its job in reducing your writes.

If it's not heavy like simple web browsing then something is wrong with your Mac.
 

Mc0

macrumors regular
Nov 6, 2017
188
369
Chrome with dozens of tabs, Edge, VS Code, Discord, Spotify, some other Electron-based apps. Chrome is most likely the main contributor, although not the only one.
Do you happen to use Spotify Web player? because I've been using the web player and I notice that my writes is higher when I use Spotify compare to when I just play random songs on YouTube. My average writes when I use Spotify web player is 70GB per day vs the 40-50GB per day when I DON'T use it. I'm a full stack developer and I don't perform resource intensive tasks.
 

featherlessbird

macrumors newbie
Feb 16, 2021
29
24
Do you happen to use Spotify Web player? because I've been using the web player and I notice that my writes is higher when I use Spotify compare to when I just play random songs on YouTube. My average writes when I use Spotify web player is 70GB per day vs the 40-50GB per day when I DON'T use it. I'm a full stack developer and I don't perform resource intensive tasks.
I've tried the web player for some time, but didn't notice much of a difference in writes compared to the regular app, so I switched back.
 

sneeks

macrumors 65816
Oct 21, 2007
1,017
390
Glasgow, UK
The process that runs most often now on my Mac is photolibraryd, i may disable photos from syncing with my Mac as i don't really need them on it. Some light use tonight watching YouTube in Firefox and then it was left in sleep mode for 3 hours. All appears ok to me.

IMG_3985.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: osplo

KDPlazed

macrumors newbie
Mar 17, 2021
26
11
Can someone explain to me about why com.apple.StreamingUnzipService is writing a lot of data? I just bought the air a few days ago. Is it normal for this to happen?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2021-05-25 at 7.54.58 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2021-05-25 at 7.54.58 PM.png
    276 KB · Views: 145

Kung gu

Suspended
Oct 20, 2018
1,379
2,434
Can someone explain to me about why com.apple.StreamingUnzipService is writing a lot of data? I just bought the air a few days ago. Is it normal for this to happen?
Make sure to update to 11.4.
Monitor it for a week. It should be fine, it's not a lot.
 

bojan233

macrumors newbie
May 9, 2021
7
18
11.4 has helped me, so far so good.

Was doing about 100gb per day on base model air with powernap=0 and using firefox with tab discard, now getting about 20gb, relatively casual use.

Completely fine with this, and very happy... performance not affected at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sneeks and mr_jomo

mr_jomo

Cancelled
Dec 9, 2018
429
530
Can someone explain to me about why com.apple.StreamingUnzipService is writing a lot of data? I just bought the air a few days ago. Is it normal for this to happen?
OK guess - but (based on size and timing) that could probably be the macOS 11.4 update being streamed and unpackaged or based on the appearance of com.apple.mobilesoftwareupdate ditto for an IOS or iPadOS update?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ManicMarc

bk42327

macrumors newbie
May 26, 2021
3
0
If I look at my new MacBook 16 I received today I get
SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02)
Critical Warning: 0x00
Temperature: 35 Celsius
Available Spare: 100%
Available Spare Threshold: 99%
Percentage Used: 0%
Data Units Read: 4,129,182 [2.11 TB]
Data Units Written: 7,706,177 [3.94 TB]
Host Read Commands: 32,807,784
Host Write Commands: 28,353,991
Controller Busy Time: 0
Power Cycles: 231
Power On Hours: 13
Unsafe Shutdowns: 35
Media and Data Integrity Errors: 0
Error Information Log Entries: 0


The SSD according to smartctl has been up for 13 hrs now and has a total write of nearly 4 TB, that makes - in the 12 hr lifetime - 300+ GBps per hour.

Impossible to achieve, roughly a write rate of 44 Gbps? Or am I wrong?
 

IceStormNG

macrumors 6502a
Sep 23, 2020
517
676
If I look at my new MacBook 16 I received today I get
SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02)
Critical Warning: 0x00
Temperature: 35 Celsius
Available Spare: 100%
Available Spare Threshold: 99%
Percentage Used: 0%
Data Units Read: 4,129,182 [2.11 TB]
Data Units Written: 7,706,177 [3.94 TB]
Host Read Commands: 32,807,784
Host Write Commands: 28,353,991
Controller Busy Time: 0
Power Cycles: 231
Power On Hours: 13
Unsafe Shutdowns: 35
Media and Data Integrity Errors: 0
Error Information Log Entries: 0


The SSD according to smartctl has been up for 13 hrs now and has a total write of nearly 4 TB, that makes - in the 12 hr lifetime - 300+ GBps per hour.

Impossible to achieve, roughly a write rate of 44 Gbps? Or am I wrong?
If I'm not completely wrong now:

3940GiB / 13h = 303GiB/h = 65GiB/m = 1.09GiB/s

Those SSDs write at around 2GiB/s. Totally possible. But that would mean, your Mac is hammering the SSD non-stop.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.