Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

VitoBotta

macrumors 6502a
Dec 2, 2020
888
347
Espoo, Finland
I have just had my M1 MBP (8/256) write over 1 TB in an hour by the kernel_task.

The cause was easy to pinpoint: Parallels Technical Preview running Windows for Arm.

As soon as Parallels is launched (with Windows suspended i.e. not even running!), writes skyrocket from 150 KB/s to 300-400 MB/s (!) (sometimes over 500 MB/s) and stay that way as long as Parallels is running, having in the end written over 1 TB to the SSD in an hour. As soon as Parallels is shut down, writes go back to low levels.
That’s shocking
 
  • Like
Reactions: tab0reqq

dsusanj

macrumors regular
Oct 29, 2008
211
390
I use the Parallels Tech Preview w/ both Windows 10 for ARM and Ubuntu, and am not seeing that happen on my end.
I am not saying Parallels is at fault, it could just be the app that pushes my MBP to swap excessively. It is set to 3 GB of memory for the VM, leaving macOS with 5 GB while it's running - but I don't have much else running at this moment except for about ten tabs in Edge, OneNote, Bear, a mail client, and that's about it. It could be a combination of things.
 
Last edited:

Quackers

macrumors 68000
Sep 18, 2013
1,938
708
Manchester, UK
It might also be that the Windows vm was not shut down, possibly. See if the same thing happens when Windows VM is fired up from closed.
 

Tenkaykev

macrumors 6502
Jun 29, 2020
385
427
I've been following the thread since it opened. I have a M1 Air base model 8/7/256. I'm quite a light user. Brave is my default browser with some Safari use. Netflix and Prime Video and some light photo editing.
I downloaded Smartmontools about an hour ago out of curiosity.
I got my M1 Air on the 8th December and have been using it every day since I'd estimate at least six hours each day. The only time it's been switched off is when it reboots after a software update ( Public Beta Program )
Looks like I don't have any issue with excess writing, 2.38Tb written since early December. Here's a screen grab from earlier this afternoon:

Smartmon.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: osplo

trip1ex

macrumors 68040
Jan 10, 2008
3,232
1,900
I got the base Mini 5 days ago. I have 1.8 TB written according to Activity Monitor. That's a lot.

But ...I feel like everything will be ok. Either a bug and fix or temporary or designed this way and will last.
 

VitoBotta

macrumors 6502a
Dec 2, 2020
888
347
Espoo, Finland
I got the base Mini 5 days ago. I have 1.8 TB written according to Activity Monitor. That's a lot.

But ...I feel like everything will be ok. Either a bug and fix or temporary or designed this way and will last.

If it's a > 256 GB drive maybe 1.8 TB are not horrible for 5 days depending on what you do
 

theluggage

macrumors G3
Jul 29, 2011
8,015
8,449
I got the base Mini 5 days ago. I have 1.8 TB written according to Activity Monitor. That's a lot.

I wouldn't jump to any conclusions just yet - usage in the first few days is never going to be typical, what with OS installation, installing updates, installing software and the initial spotlight indexing. It's also possible that either the Mac or the SSD components underwent soak testing before delivery. What counts is how much that figure goes up under more normal day-to-day use.

There seem to be enough suggestions of a problem here that it is high time that Apple weighed in with some hard information. There's the possibility that Smartmontools is just returning incorrect info, which is something that Apple could clear up in a second. Does sound like some people are also seeing excessive writes in Activity Monitor, too (but "evidence" is not the plural of "anecdote" - someone authoritative needs to do some controlled testing).

Really, though, with expected lifetimes in the thousands of TBW it's only the few people seeing several hundred TB per month - if that's accurate - who need to worry about short0term damage to the SSD.

Still - any system with a non-replaceable SSD runs the slight risk of the SSD being hosed by a software fault. It's a design flaw in most Mac models (and probably some PCs, particularly at the Ultrabook end). May not be a deal-breaker but no permutation of misconceptions makes soldering in a known perishable component a good idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gank41

gank41

macrumors 601
Mar 25, 2008
4,350
5,022
I keep checking my TBW every day in Terminal, and I REALLY wish I knew what caused a high amount to be written initially, because after finding this thread and then checking every day or two, I've pretty much stalled out to not adding much at all. And I'm not changing my workflow in any way at all.

Feb 23= 22.7 TBW (first checked)
Feb 24= 22.9 TBW
Feb 25= 23.2 TBW
March 3= 24.4 TBW
Today= 25.1 TBW

THAT seems normal to me. I just wish I knew what created that high amount after 3 month initially. I've used Onyx once in the above timeframe, too, and had the option to delete local time machine snapshots enabled. I'm not here to get into a debate on whether to to to not use Onyx here, but you'd think creating the local time machine snapshots would use up more TBW than what is shown overall above. And I've gone thru and checked to confirm that more new local snapshots have been created after that. I'm stumped! And yet not really worried? I'm the type of person that just needs to know why. Not that it's "fixed".
 

VitoBotta

macrumors 6502a
Dec 2, 2020
888
347
Espoo, Finland
I keep checking my TBW every day in Terminal, and I REALLY wish I knew what caused a high amount to be written initially, because after finding this thread and then checking every day or two, I've pretty much stalled out to not adding much at all. And I'm not changing my workflow in any way at all.

Feb 23= 22.7 TBW (first checked)
Feb 24= 22.9 TBW
Feb 25= 23.2 TBW
March 3= 24.4 TBW
Today= 25.1 TBW

THAT seems normal to me. I just wish I knew what created that high amount after 3 month initially. I've used Onyx once in the above timeframe, too, and had the option to delete local time machine snapshots enabled. I'm not here to get into a debate on whether to to to not use Onyx here, but you'd think creating the local time machine snapshots would use up more TBW than what is shown overall above. And I've gone thru and checked to confirm that more new local snapshots have been created after that. I'm stumped! And yet not really worried? I'm the type of person that just needs to know why. Not that it's "fixed".
25 TB in ONE DAY????
 

trip1ex

macrumors 68040
Jan 10, 2008
3,232
1,900
I wouldn't jump to any conclusions just yet - usage in the first few days is never going to be typical, what with OS installation, installing updates, installing software and the initial spotlight indexing. It's also possible that either the Mac or the SSD components underwent soak testing before delivery. What counts is how much that figure goes up under more normal day-to-day use.

There seem to be enough suggestions of a problem here that it is high time that Apple weighed in with some hard information. There's the possibility that Smartmontools is just returning incorrect info, which is something that Apple could clear up in a second. Does sound like some people are also seeing excessive writes in Activity Monitor, too (but "evidence" is not the plural of "anecdote" - someone authoritative needs to do some controlled testing).

Really, though, with expected lifetimes in the thousands of TBW it's only the few people seeing several hundred TB per month - if that's accurate - who need to worry about short0term damage to the SSD.

Still - any system with a non-replaceable SSD runs the slight risk of the SSD being hosed by a software fault. It's a design flaw in most Mac models (and probably some PCs, particularly at the Ultrabook end). May not be a deal-breaker but no permutation of misconceptions makes soldering in a known perishable component a good idea.
yeah read the next line in my post you quoted. The one where it says, "But ...I feel like everything will be ok. Either a bug and fix or temporary or designed this way and will last." ;)
 

Spikeee

macrumors newbie
Nov 21, 2020
8
2
just ran my stats on 8gb 512gb Mac Air. 110TB written. I do have two parallels vm's but I only use them once or twice a week. the rest of my usage is 8-10 hours of 10 tabs of safari, 3-4 excel spreadsheets, 2 or 3 powerpoint docs and outlook.
parallels kills the battery life as well as causing heat under my right wrist.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: tab0reqq

Quackers

macrumors 68000
Sep 18, 2013
1,938
708
Manchester, UK
I've only just re-installed macOS on my M1 MBA so my current numbers mean nothing in this context. They're literally in the single figure GB for disk writes and o bytes for swap.
Even in my previous installs when I had 2 VM's running at times (Windows 10 for ARM and Ubuntu) my disk writes never got to more than a few hundred GB's in a couple of weeks' use. At that time it wasn't possible to hibernate Windows 10 so it was always shut down.
Since this thread was started I've kept an eye on writes and I've never seen anything untoward and never seen any swap used.
Other than those 2 VM's my use has been light. I have 16GB ram and 512GB SSD.
My MBA is put to sleep every night and many times during the day too by shutting the lid.
Sleep is set to never in the settings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gank41

VitoBotta

macrumors 6502a
Dec 2, 2020
888
347
Espoo, Finland
just ran my stats on 8gb 512gb Mac Air. 110TB written. I do have two parallels vm's but I only use them once or twice a week. the rest of my usage is 8-10 hours of 10 tabs of safari, 3-4 excel spreadsheets, 2 or 3 powerpoint docs and outlook.
parallels kills the battery life as well as causing heat under my right wrist.

How long have you owned the Air? 110 TB is quite bad :D
 

Quackers

macrumors 68000
Sep 18, 2013
1,938
708
Manchester, UK
1st Dec. I think its down to parallels. my vm's are configured with 4gb ram. I expect that causes a lot of swap.
Mine were the same.
Correct me if I'm wrong but if the VM's aren't shutdown their ram remains tied to them, effectively making your Mac 8GB ram. If they're shut down the ram is freed for use by the Mac.
 

Dockland

macrumors 6502a
Feb 26, 2021
968
8,944
Sweden
If it's a > 256 GB drive maybe 1.8 TB are not horrible for 5 days depending on what you do

For comparision, as I wrote in the comment section for the video linked (with the survey) the other day

"Checked my Linx/Windows machine 13 TB Written to my 512 GB Samsung 970 since 2017, in almost 4 years. That's a computer i do all the heavy editing stuff on. 4K video, RAW photo editing and so on. (My Mac Mini M1 writes approx. 10-15 GB to the drive per day, it's on between 4-8h a day."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forti and robotica

VitoBotta

macrumors 6502a
Dec 2, 2020
888
347
Espoo, Finland
For comparision, as I wrote in the comment section for the video linked (with the survey) the other day

"Checked my Linx/Windows machine 13 TB Written to my 512 GB Samsung 970 since 2017, in almost 4 years. That's a computer i do all the heavy editing stuff on. 4K video, RAW photo editing and so on. (My Mac Mini M1 writes approx. 10-15 GB to the drive per day, it's on between 4-8h a day."
What a difference
 

ItWasNotMe

macrumors 6502
Dec 1, 2012
454
318
For comparision, as I wrote in the comment section for the video linked (with the survey) the other day

"Checked my Linx/Windows machine 13 TB Written to my 512 GB Samsung 970 since 2017, in almost 4 years. That's a computer i do all the heavy editing stuff on. 4K video, RAW photo editing and so on. (My Mac Mini M1 writes approx. 10-15 GB to the drive per day, it's on between 4-8h a day."
If you're using Photoshop I'd be interested in how much data launchd is using. When I sit in PS the launchd writes are astronomic. This is less than 7 (seven) hours today
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2021-03-07 at 20.42.35.png
    Screenshot 2021-03-07 at 20.42.35.png
    34.3 KB · Views: 73

Dockland

macrumors 6502a
Feb 26, 2021
968
8,944
Sweden
If you're using Photoshop I'd be interested in how much data launchd is using. When I sit in PS the launchd writes are astronomic. This is less than 7 (seven) hours today

I use the native M1 Photoshop Beta/Preview. Will check that during the week.
 

Baff

macrumors regular
Jan 3, 2008
135
180
For any curious, they said: "We'll collect for a few weeks yet, or until Apple provides a response. And we'll release some insights on the channels as we go."

I am curious to see what they come up with, but they really didn't ask for much info. I use almost none of the 20 or so apps that they ask about. They only asked about 1 browser: Chrome. They didn't ask about any Apple apps. So, I am not holding out much hope that they will come to any great conclusions as to the cause.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Fomalhaut
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.