Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Some of the heavier handed elements (Shakespeare for comedy; Hitler for analogy) make me wince a bit but it doesn't keep me from loving this scene. The further we get from the era in which this was filmed, the more its subtext seems timeless. Over the decades, Klingons have been stand-ins for the competing "other" that most permeates our society's fears. At the time they were Soviets; now, maybe they could be Russians, Muslims or [insert whichever party you're not in].

David Warner hits the perfect tone in his delivery of the last line. 'Twas ever thus.

 

Scepticalscribe

macrumors Haswell
Original poster
Jul 29, 2008
65,133
47,522
In a coffee shop.
Some of the heavier handed elements (Shakespeare for comedy; Hitler for analogy) make me wince a bit but it doesn't keep me from loving this scene. The further we get from the era in which this was filmed, the more its subtext seems timeless. Over the decades, Klingons have been stand-ins for the competing "other" that most permeates our society's fears. At the time they were Soviets; now, maybe they could be Russians, Muslims or [insert whichever party you're not in].

David Warner hits the perfect tone in his delivery of the last line. 'Twas ever thus.


And that same David Warner was simply superlative - as was Patrick Stewart, and their scenes together were gripping - who turned in an utterly compelling performance - in the outstanding pair of episodes "Chains of Command" (parts 1 & 2).
 

Obi Wan Kenobi

macrumors 6502a
Mar 9, 2011
509
345
London, UK
@Ironworker808 Love that scene too. Undiscovered country is one of my favourite movies with the original cast.
[doublepost=1497456251][/doublepost]
Overall I just found Bakula's Archer irritating. He was too much like Shatner's Kirk in terms of his impetuosity, but what worked in the '60s doesn't work in the 21st century.


Agreed.

It is a kind of uncomplicated, clichéd interpretation of a certain type of what is thought to be classic 'male' leadership (as conceived by TV and cinema).

I know what you both mean, but I'm not sure that was Bakula's choice. I think that's how the producers wanted his character to be, in order to fit in with the 'future' Kirk.

Moreover, I thought the actor weak, and the character poorly conceived and written. Worse, few of the other characters - with the possible exception of T'Pol - and Charles Tucker - were all that well written, and weren't fully developed - leaving Scott Bakula as Captain Archer to carry more of the weight of the show, a task for which he wasn't especially well equipped.

I think that's a bit harsh on Bakula as an actor. He did well in Quantum Leap so his ability can't be that bad. Don't misunderstand me, I think he's the weakest captain. But I think the blame lay more with how his part was conceived and written than with how he portrayed him. I also think the Quantum Leap baggage was considerable, and that they would have done better with a different lead actor. For any Star Trek iteration, the casting of the captain is critical. IMO they got it wrong here.

T'Pol and Tucker were the best of rest of the characters and not given enough time. Again, I think this was a conscious decision by the producers to make the show around the captain, in the way TOS was. Another mistake, in my view. If they were to try and consciously adopt a formula for a Star Trek iteration, they should have gone with TNG, not TOS. Television and audiences have moved on a lot since TOS, although I can well understand them being fearful of comparison.
 
Last edited:

mobilehaathi

macrumors G3
Aug 19, 2008
9,368
6,353
The Anthropocene
Some of the heavier handed elements (Shakespeare for comedy; Hitler for analogy) make me wince a bit but it doesn't keep me from loving this scene. The further we get from the era in which this was filmed, the more its subtext seems timeless. Over the decades, Klingons have been stand-ins for the competing "other" that most permeates our society's fears. At the time they were Soviets; now, maybe they could be Russians, Muslims or [insert whichever party you're not in].

David Warner hits the perfect tone in his delivery of the last line. 'Twas ever thus.

Hard to imagine a scene like that appearing in a contemporary Star Trek movie. Sigh.
 

Mousse

macrumors 68040
Apr 7, 2008
3,648
7,082
Flea Bottom, King's Landing
Just for fun, for those that didn't like S.B. as Archer, who might you see that would have been a better fit or which actor today would have been if they were the proper age back then?

I associate Bakula too much with Quantum Leap. Coupled with poor writing and lack of character development, it made it difficult to see Archer as a real Captain.

Jeffrey Combs might have been a good choice. He portrayed the Thy'lek Shran, commander of the Andorian starship, on Enterprise and is convincing as an authority figure. Trekkies will probably see too much Weyoun in him. I saw a bit of the Weyoun character in Shran. He also portrayed the Ferengi Brunt. That was pretty shocking; none of Weyoun's charm or humor in that character.

In the end, I don't think any actor would have made a convincing Archer, with the poor writing on Enterprise.
 

Obi Wan Kenobi

macrumors 6502a
Mar 9, 2011
509
345
London, UK
I think starting a new Star Trek iteration is very difficult. While on the one hand you have a well established brand and universe to draw on, you also have an incredibly knowledgeable fan base, that know the franchise and universe better than you do. There are several hundred episodes to contend with. Fans will recognise (and not forgive you for) repeating a plot line or getting 'technology' wrong. A great deal of the universe was explored with TOS, TNG, DS9, Voyager and Enterprise. Where do you set it? When?

I think the standards for acting, and writing set by TNG are very hard to live up to, and TV writing has also improved exponentially since the 80s. They didn't make shows like the Sopranos, The West Wing and Breaking Bad in those days. Audiences now have high expectations. Because of the success of the earlier iterations, ST isn't a niche interest any more. It's become mainstream.

I think Battlestar Galactica raised the standards again. They took on a number of challenging issues, with a fantastic ensemble cast and brilliant writers and made a SF show that won acting, writing and directing plaudits. The next ST iteration will be expected to compete with that too.

The more recent ST movies are fun swashbuckling adventures (and I enjoy them), but they are not really advancing the ST universe.

There have been rumours of a new ST iteration before. I hope the new rumours prove to be true, and the series gets made. But I don't underestimate the size of the challenge they face.
 

Lord Blackadder

macrumors P6
May 7, 2004
15,678
5,511
Sod off

I never saw Quantum Leap, so my experience with Bakula is confined to Enterprise. I don't think he is a poor actor, and it may be that what I don't like about his character was foisted on him by the writers. In either case, it just didn't work for me.

I think you can contrast this with Stewart's Picard - his ability to play even frankly silly scenes with utter conviction makes TNG work even in moments where it perhaps shouldn't have.

I agree that it is difficult to tie pre-TOS characters in with Shatner's Kirk, but I would argue that they simply shouldn't try; there is plenty of space within the Trek universe for any range of personalities, as long as they are compelling.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe

Obi Wan Kenobi

macrumors 6502a
Mar 9, 2011
509
345
London, UK
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe

ActionableMango

macrumors G3
Sep 21, 2010
9,612
6,909
Oh man, I agree with all of you, Entrprise theme was just horrible.

I sure loved the visuals though, showing the progression of humanity's exploration across frontiers.

The traditional "show the ship moving across pretty space vistas" was getting a bit old, so I am glad that they tried something new.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AngerDanger

phrehdd

macrumors 601
Oct 25, 2008
4,474
1,428
I associate Bakula too much with Quantum Leap. Coupled with poor writing and lack of character development, it made it difficult to see Archer as a real Captain.

Jeffrey Combs might have been a good choice. He portrayed the Thy'lek Shran, commander of the Andorian starship, on Enterprise and is convincing as an authority figure. Trekkies will probably see too much Weyoun in him. I saw a bit of the Weyoun character in Shran. He also portrayed the Ferengi Brunt. That was pretty shocking; none of Weyoun's charm or humor in that character.

In the end, I don't think any actor would have made a convincing Archer, with the poor writing on Enterprise.

I mentioned him before (or elsewhere) as being a particularly good actor doing multi-roles but I admit that out of makeup, it would be hard to tell if he would do an Enterprise captain all that well. Would be interesting to see him try.

As for Enterprise theme - I thought this was more fun and interesting (images too) in A Mirror, Darkly episode -
 
  • Like
Reactions: IronWaffle

mobilehaathi

macrumors G3
Aug 19, 2008
9,368
6,353
The Anthropocene
I associate Bakula too much with Quantum Leap. Coupled with poor writing and lack of character development, it made it difficult to see Archer as a real Captain.

Jeffrey Combs might have been a good choice. He portrayed the Thy'lek Shran, commander of the Andorian starship, on Enterprise and is convincing as an authority figure. Trekkies will probably see too much Weyoun in him. I saw a bit of the Weyoun character in Shran. He also portrayed the Ferengi Brunt. That was pretty shocking; none of Weyoun's charm or humor in that character.

In the end, I don't think any actor would have made a convincing Archer, with the poor writing on Enterprise.
Jeffery Combs as a star fleet captain. Interesting. I have to admit I really enjoyed him in his numerous roles; he was probably the only reason I watched Enterprise---so that I might catch an episode with him in it. I suppose it could work, maybe, but as you say the writing would have had to change quite a bit.

It is difficult for me to think of a better choice for Archer (maybe H. Jon Benjamin? :p), probably because I rather disliked the character/writing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mousse
David Warner can do no wrong :D

Uh, much as I enjoy him in Undiscovered Country, "Chain of Command" (where he was last minute recasting and delivered that superb performance with help from cue cards!), and Time After Time (directed by Wrath of Khan's Nicholas Meyer) even he couldn't rescue ST V: The Final Frontier.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe

AngerDanger

Graphics
Staff member
Dec 9, 2008
5,452
29,006
Agree with both @mobilehaathi and @Lord Blackadder about the theme music of Enterprise - absolutely awful.

Oh man, I agree with all of you, Entrprise theme was just horrible.

I sure loved the visuals though, showing the progression of humanity's exploration across frontiers.

Wow, I hadn't heard the ENT theme before reading this chain, and goodness is it terrible. I agree with @ActionableMango that the visuals are great, which makes it even worse that they're paired with that music.

Perhaps somebody like Gary Numan would've been able to come up with an arrangement more suited to the sense of wonderment and progress conveyed by the visuals:

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe

jdoll021

macrumors 6502
Some of the heavier handed elements (Shakespeare for comedy; Hitler for analogy) make me wince a bit but it doesn't keep me from loving this scene. The further we get from the era in which this was filmed, the more its subtext seems timeless. Over the decades, Klingons have been stand-ins for the competing "other" that most permeates our society's fears. At the time they were Soviets; now, maybe they could be Russians, Muslims or [insert whichever party you're not in].

David Warner hits the perfect tone in his delivery of the last line. 'Twas ever thus.


Ah yes, one of my favorite scenes in the movie. Kirk's obvious contempt, Spock's genuine desire to form at least the beginnings of a friendship, Chang's wolf like amusement and Gorkon's patient optimism, perfectly captured in that last line. The Klingon's befuddlement with human culture and the human's disgust of Klingon culture. A lot going on in that scene. Dare I say more going on than many of the action scenes. One of the oft missed moments I think is the exchange between McCoy and the Klingon officer who is convinced that peace means the end of his culture with McCoy's insistence that is not the case. You can kind of see two extreme points of view in that exchange; on one end, a genuine unwillingness to compromise and on the other end, a genuine belief in righteousness.

I think you're right. This is a timeless scene that can be used to highlight the inherent conflicts of a dominant culture and a subordinate culture. I always took it as about race relations in America, but given the American tendency to treat other non-American and non-Western cultures as subordinate, this could be a stand in for those conflicts as well. Today, more than ever, we stand at the beginning of the "Undiscovered Country" and, as Gorkon says later, "if there is to be a brave, bold new future, our generation will have the hardest time living in it."
[doublepost=1497466809][/doublepost]
Uh, much as I enjoy him in Undiscovered Country, Chain of Command (where he was last minute recasting and delivered that performance with help from cue cards!), and Time After Tome (directed by Khan's Nicholas Meyer) even he couldn't rescue ST V.
Agreed. Of the three "ambassadors," his was probably the most believable, but it still didn't save ST V from being a hot, jarring, disjointed mess. When I saw Spock's rocket boots, I knew there would be trouble.
 

Number-Six

macrumors 6502
Jul 25, 2013
416
1,206
Uh, much as I enjoy him in Undiscovered Country, Chain of Command (where he was last minute recasting and delivered that performance with help from cue cards!), and Time After Tome (directed by Khan's Nicholas Meyer) even he couldn't rescue ST V.

I must be the only person in the world that liked ST V haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: IronWaffle

Lord Blackadder

macrumors P6
May 7, 2004
15,678
5,511
Sod off
Wow, I hadn't heard the ENT theme before reading this chain, and goodness is it terrible. I agree with @ActionableMango that the visuals are great, which makes it even worse that they're paired with that music.

Perhaps somebody like Gary Numan would've been able to come up with an arrangement more suited to the sense of wonderment and progress conveyed by the visuals:

Nothing wrong with the visuals, but the music is grim. I would have preferred a symphonic theme, but I'm a traditionalist when it comes to that.
 

BigMcGuire

Cancelled
Jan 10, 2012
9,832
14,032
I associate Bakula too much with Quantum Leap. Coupled with poor writing and lack of character development, it made it difficult to see Archer as a real Captain.

Another Quantum Leap watcher here. I could not get used to him as captain. I was extremely excited when I heard Enterprise was coming to TV... however after watching a handful of episodes into the first season it ... I... I, I just couldn't continue. It was just so bad. I really liked Quantum Leap but I could not get used to him as the captain.


I can't believe I didn't find this thread earlier!!! I'm a H U G E star trek fan. Star Trek has been my life - why I got into computers, etc... I stayed up late every night to watch Star Trek TOS on a black and white TV - every night (it was on after Cheers and Hunter) in 1989-1993.

In the early 90s I watched TNG. Then in high school I watched Voyager. After Voyager I found out about DS9 and watched that. And ... have never watched Enterprise completely - saving that for a rainy day if I can tolerate it.

TNG is probably my most favorite series with DS9 close behind. Picard is my favorite captain. However, DS9 had some amazing episodes with O'Brien and the doctor and the doctor and garak (one of my favorite actors). DS9's fleet battles were amazing. The Emergency Medical Hologram was my favorite character on Voyager. I didn't like Janeway that much though she was a strong actor. The EMH influenced me strongly to be a programmer - I wanted to program the EMH someday (probably a big reason why I'm a programmer today). Spock, Data had the biggest influences on me as a child. I found I got in trouble with the parents less when I imitated their stoic anti-emotion behavior.


Captains: Picard is a clear winner. Sisko and Kirk were strong but I never really connected with them. Janeway just pissed me off a lot - putting the needs of others above her crew, not showing force, etc (she was a great actor)...

Ships: My most favorite Enterprise is the Enterprise D. I really like the Excelsior class for some reason.

Most Favorite Star Trek Actors: Data, Spock, O'Brien, Riker, Geordi, and The EMH in that order.


My wife tolerates Star Trek but she definitely doesn't enjoy it as much as I do --- I imagine growing up with it on a daily basis my whole childhood affects my enjoyment of it (Star Trek). There are definitely some episodes that are cringe worthy (first season of TNG). lol.
 
Ah yes, one of my favorite scenes in the movie. Kirk's obvious contempt, Spock's genuine desire to form at least the beginnings of a friendship, Chang's wolf like amusement and Gorkon's patient optimism, perfectly captured in that last line. The Klingon's befuddlement with human culture and the human's disgust of Klingon culture. A lot going on in that scene. Dare I say more going on than many of the action scenes. One of the oft missed moments I think is the exchange between McCoy and the Klingon officer who is convinced that peace means the end of his culture with McCoy's insistence that is not the case. You can kind of see two extreme points of view in that exchange; on one end, a genuine unwillingness to compromise and on the other end, a genuine belief in righteousness.

I think you're right. This is a timeless scene that can be used to highlight the inherent conflicts of a dominant culture and a subordinate culture. I always took it as about race relations in America, but given the American tendency to treat other non-American and non-Western cultures as subordinate, this could be a stand in for those conflicts as well. Today, more than ever, we stand at the beginning of the "Undiscovered Country" and, as Gorkon says later, "if there is to be a brave, bold new future, our generation will have the hardest time living in it."
That really is a great line, and its wistfulness is something we'd all be better for mimicking, rather than unholstering and weaponizing our frustrations, resentments, fears, and angers. Those who would call that "too P.C.," "naive," elitist," or whatever miss the point of the striving. When its hardest to do is when its most important to make that effort in a kind of mindful, civil defiance.

It's those elements in your post that keep me returning to the movie despite the ill-fitting humor (Klingon dictionaries, firing phasers in the kitchen, the implausible Kirk hero moment at the end, the unintentionally funny "Scooby Doo" ending, etc.) I was 20 when it came out and I remember feeling a bit short-changed on the action (not so much the battles as general space scenery) but being gripped by the story and relieved that the instantly disappointing Final Frontier was more a blip than a trend. It felt of my time, what with the recent fall of the Berlin Wall and Chernobyl, of which this film is a non-radioactive byproduct. It makes one hopeful that even if the recent movies lack the thematic punch of ST:VI (the ham-fisted and erratic "commentary" of ST:ID aside), that Discovery may tackle our times. Even though the modern Battlestar Galactica (re-envisioned by TNG & DS9 alum, Ronald D Moore) was very much a dark reflection of Trek, I feel that its first two-and-a-half seasons examine the political and societal strains of that show's production years consciously in a way that TOS did. Hopefully, Discovery takes the best of what's been done and sprinkles in just enough action/effects to sugarcoat the pill. Trek was sometimes but never really as "deep" as its defenders would suggest (in my opinion) but it is unique and deserves a seat at the modern table of "serious thought" for those who prefer "the age of distraction."

Agreed. Of the three "ambassadors," his was probably the most believable, but it still didn't save ST V from being a hot, jarring, disjointed mess. When I saw Spock's rocket boots, I knew there would be trouble.
His performance is fine but there's not much to work with. While he's never attained the stature of Michael Caine and remain(s/ed?) a working character actor, his appearance in the film reminds me of this quote:

"I have never seen it but by all accounts it is terrible. However, I have seen the house that it built and it is terrific." -- Michael Caine on why he was in Jaws 4.

I must be the only person in the world that liked ST V haha

I'd label it as two things: a groaner first, then a grower. So much is wrong with it. So very, very much. But it does offer some nice character moments (particularly McCoy and his father, though Kelley apparently disapproved to a degree -- that's for others to research, I'm afraid). I also accept that this movie may be the most "in the spirit" of the original show, as well. As a "blockbuster" you wait two or three years to see, it was a terrible disappointment (in my life probably only beaten by Superman IV) but now, with so many episodes and films, it feels "of a piece." Sometimes you don't want "City on the Edge of Forever," you want "Way to Eden." I mean, dammit Jim, it's Final Frontier, not [insert your preferred film here] and that's okay.

Hmmmm. You must have a typo in your sentence somewhere, because you accidentally made it read as if you liked ST V, which is of course impossible.

If I may...

James T. Kirk: My friends, the great experiment... Star Trek V, ready for theatrical run.
Hikaru Sulu: She's supposed to be the final frontier.
Montgomery Scott:[unimpressed] Aye. And if my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a wagon.
James T. Kirk: Come, come, Mr. Scott. Young minds, fresh ideas. Be tolerant.
 
Last edited:

BigMcGuire

Cancelled
Jan 10, 2012
9,832
14,032
My pleasure.

That episode that you mentioned - "The Inner Light" is astonishing. And brilliant - one of the very best (in a series distinguished by some outstanding episodes) episodes in the entire franchise. And all told in an hour.

Patrick Stewart's exquisite talent - and extraordinary range are put to powerful use in that portrayal of the beautiful but ultimately bittersweet alternative life lived by Jean-Luc Picard (superbly acted again by Patrick Stewart - putting an established and gifted classical actor in that role allowed for a wonderful degree of subtle character exploration and development over time that - to my mind - gave STNG an added dimension) in the superb episode "The Inner Light"? Brilliant. Superb. And close to perfection.

Actually, it is a beautiful and heart-breaking episode. One with no violence, or CGI, or dramatics. Just a superb story, script, and a stunning awe-inspiring performance from Patrick Stewart: One where Patrick Stewart manages - with a moving but deeply felt of economy of expression manages to convey a fully lived alternative life - a completely believable and credible alternative life, - one with a wife, family, a grounded identity in home and community - even though Captain Picard of the Enterprise - with his grasp of science (which is what allows him to measure - accurately - that the planet is doomed because the sun will go supernova) would never have willingly chosen such a deceptively simple life.

The single best episode in all of Star Trek ... ever.... One of the few episodes to leave me in tears. Every time I hear that flute solo, it's so hard not to tear up. I'll remember that episode forever.
[doublepost=1497471212][/doublepost]
BBC had an original series marathon airing over the holiday, which i had on in the background and caught a few episodes.


"Gamesters of Triskelion" where is with this woman who looks like lady Gaga.

tutoring.jpg

The wife and I just got done watching this episode two nights ago. She took a photo and sent it to all her friends with that very line - Looks like lady gaga! lol.
 

D.T.

macrumors G4
Sep 15, 2011
11,050
12,467
Vilano Beach, FL
Uh, much as I enjoy him in Undiscovered Country, "Chain of Command" (where he was last minute recasting and delivered that superb performance with help from cue cards!), and Time After Time (directed by Wrath of Khan's Nicholas Meyer) even he couldn't rescue ST V: The Final Frontier.


Hahaha, yes, sometimes I enjoy his performances in a vacuum, ignoring the movie around him :D I *love* Time After Time.
 

mobilehaathi

macrumors G3
Aug 19, 2008
9,368
6,353
The Anthropocene
However, DS9 had some amazing episodes with O'Brien and the doctor and the doctor and garak (one of my favorite actors).

I have to admit that Dr. Bashir as a character rather annoyed the hell out of me. He was insufferably self absorbed; he thought far too highly of himself and was open about it. And the character was very clearly written as desiring a simpering helpless female companion to whom he could play a paternalistic partner. (And of course this is why he failed so miserably with Dax, she was nothing of the sort.) Anyway, I didn't find the character very endearing at all, but he was a good character to have on the station, and as you say he had many good episodes throughout the series.


Oh and Garak. Perhaps my favorite character on DS9...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.