It was definitely a little bit of a rough start, though it had been, what? About 18 years since the original show ended, TV sci-fi hadn't fared very well in the interim, so they had a significant number of hurdles. I'm glad they were able to sustain long enough to get a good foundation of character, tone, etc. Hiring Patrick Stewart was a brilliant casting decision.
The casting of Patrick Stewart (initially, over the head of Gene Roddenberry, who wanted someone more like William Shatner - someone such as Jonathan Frakes (Riker) - for that role) was what made STNG, in my view.
Just think of the power of two classically trained British actors - David Warner and Patrick Stewart in the stunning two part episode "Chain of Command" - this far surpasses any of the movies - any of them! - for sheer narrative power (Patrick Stewart - who is a member of Amnesty International, insisted on being shot naked for the scenes where he was tortured, a decision Jonathan Frakes described, rightly, as "extremely brave" - remember this was the early 90s)- , nail-biting tension, superb acting, stunning scripts, gripping stories.....
From series three onwards, Patrick Stewart - especially when he insisted (to the directors) on participating in more 'away missions' - made that series his own; terrific two-parters such as "Chain of Command", "Gambit" "Unification", - were gripping, and the stunning story arc of the intrigues and murder in the Klingon political power struggle - told over a number of brilliant episodes - such as "Reunion", and the two part episode "Redemption" were utterly compelling.
I should probably add, I was a huge fan of the original, but the same critique applies, though the original show didn't have as much of an A/B narrative model, it had some strong EPs (usually written by a who's who of classic sci-fi) and some serious stinkers
Remember, the original series featured the first black woman ever to appear as a commissioned officer (Lt Uhuru), the first Asian (Lt Sulu), and - in the second season - after the Soviet Government had grumbled (politely) that their advances in space, (Tsiolkovsky, Korolev, Gagarin, et all) had been dismissed, ignored, and entirely over-looked, which they muttered was an American attempt to write them out of the history of space exploration, wondering why Soviet/Russian contributions to space exploration hadn't been acknowledged or recognised by the 23rd-24th centuries - Gene Roddenberry - to his credit - accepted that they might have had a point, and wrote Pavel Chekhov (played by Walter Koenig) into the series as a result.
Later, in an episode of STNG, there was a casual reference to a ship called the USS-Tsiolkovsky - and I smiled quietly to myself at this subtle salute.
[doublepost=1492906600][/doublepost]
This story line although interesting and intriguing, the concept of judgement, it puzzles me as there was no pressing reason to violate the Prime Directive other than the prospect of getting laid, lol. Remember that episode where they had the shielded blind setup so the natives would not be aware of them?
[doublepost=1492904963][/doublepost]
I'll be looking for them as I progress down the list.
Hm, yes.
Male writers, ......this is one of the reasons you might need writers (including perhaps some women) who can supply other perspectives.
Yes,
@Huntn, there must have been reasons other than the presumed pleasures of getting laid to violate the Prime Directive.
I would argue that curiosity - seeking answers to the age-old philosophical questions such as those posed by the Promethean Fire, Garden of Eden queries - in other words, intellectual curiosity - can be compelling.
I do remember the episode in question, and the point was that one of the locals stumbled over the observers and couldn't deal with it.
Then, there was the episode where Data made friends with a young girl whose planet was going supernova.