NB. You don’t say what
you thought the data meant so I may or may not be disagreeing with you here, but the first thing to do with any data off t’internet is to see how many holes you can pick in it…
I’d concede that it does give some weight to “all in ones aren’t dead” but then the iMac isn’t dead, either - just the high end, large screen version.
So, I looked at the article text, and I must say that its good to know what ChatGPT thinks about the future. (I could be wrong but the “expand at -0.2%” bit as well as the general fact-salad nature of the article that has me suspicious - plus you’re not going to get useful economic forecasting for free).
Otherwise, the idea that the $ value of the desktop PC market will only vary by 0.2% over a decade which included COVID and a massive chip shortage seems dubious.
…but, anyway, if you believe the data (and read the text to maker sure you are interpreting the graph correctly) it’s still saying that tower PCs are the biggest revenue earner, followed by minis, with all-in-ones in third place (it doesn’t say whether the tower or Mini PC revenue included displays, though - if not, the data will be skewed towards all in ones). It explicitly says that the Mini sector is where the growth should be expected …but, without any confidence intervals on the figures, nothing in that chart predicts significant growth or decline and the whole report gets an ‘F’ grade, so I wouldn’t build any argument on it, one way or another.