That's pretty ballsey to advertise a Bronco in white
[doublepost=1456373355][/doublepost]
Seems a little early for a redo already. The current MDX isn't what, any more than 2-3 years old at this point.
[doublepost=1456373887][/doublepost]
Wait so are we talking about aesthetics or the mechanics underneath?
The whole station wagon thing, that's basically the definition of a station wagon. Just as coupes are the 2dr version of the sedan. E Class, E Wagon, E coupe. A Prius V as far as I know is the wagon version of a standard Prius. Usually wagons maintain the same nomenclature in many cases and aren't trying to make a distinctive model.
All of the luxury (especially super luxury) manufactures have gone to lengths to maintain the iconic look of their cars within their SUVs and sedans (if applicable ex Porsche, Maseratti). These companies very much rely on maintaining an evolutionary but distinctive look. To make a Porsche SUV that looked like a Tahoe or a sedan like an S-Class would go against their marketing strategy. A Porsche from 50 years ago still has the same cues as a brand new one.
Yeah, I noted that wagon versions retain the same overall body, but the Prius was badly done even in that regard. As for the others I referred to, those were cases where the creators had zero inclination to make a distinctive model, which I find to be a shame. I'm not referring to an SUV with a sedan chassis - I'm referring to SUVs whose designs come straight from the designs previously used with a car. The new Tesla remained the old Tesla model S, yet was simply modified to look like an SUV. It's a pathetic and lazy way to design an SUV, whether or not it be on a car chassis. I understand the want to have an SUV reflect a company's distinctive car design, but they've often been doing it so cheaply these days. It's ever so apparent with this new Tesla. In fact, this new Tesla doesn't only look like a modified Tesla S, it also looks plain ugly and is nothing new. They could have done much better.
