Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

kryten42

macrumors 6502
Sep 17, 2015
254
266
In a little world of my own
Audo S3/S4 and A4 are out as I would want the 2017 model and out of price range right now.

It is mostly just 1 or 2 people in the car. I like the idea of the bigger older cars (6er/7er/A7/A8) but the newer cars have benefit of warranty included etc. The Jag I like, like the looks, good warranty etc, depreciation is biggest concern by a long way.
 

A.Goldberg

macrumors 68030
Jan 31, 2015
2,549
9,715
Boston
That is quite a hodgepodge of vehicles and price ranges. I'd narrow your vehicle type and price point first.

I think the XC90 is a great family car. It set the standard for the 7-passenger crossover SUV back in ~2003, and I think it has done it again. The only thing is I'm not a fan of their 4cyl cross the board engine lineup. I'd feel much better with a 6cyl NA or turbo under the hood.

If you have kids, I'd stay away from the 3. Overall it's a great car but at the end of the day it's not a very large car. I don't have kids and the 3 seems just to small. I'm very happy with the size of my 5-series. 7 is too big and now you're getting into a much more expensive car to buy and maintain.

My friend just bought a brand new A7 3.0T S-Line. It's a pretty sweet ride. I've never been a huge fan of the A6. The A8 despite not being the best flagship out there (hard to be an S-Class) is probably my top pick.

Honestly I'm not too sure about the Jag route. Depreciation is very possibly a concern depending on how long you keep your car. New ones IMO are too expensive for what they are. One of my bosses has one, it's a nice car, but I think you get a lot more for your money with the Germans. And if you're looking for AWD you have to look for a pretty new one. Even then, it seems the AWD models are not nearly as pravalent as other makes.

Again I think you need to narrow down what you're looking for. There's a big cost of ownership difference between an entry level sedan and flagship model.
 

Alphazoid

macrumors 65816
Dec 5, 2014
1,012
862
Isn't the A7 due for a refresh anyway. Get the Macan S or a 535

I'd lease a Jag but not sure i'd want to own one. Interior quality is just not up to scratch. That and i'm wary of JLR products in general
 

kryten42

macrumors 6502
Sep 17, 2015
254
266
In a little world of my own
That is quite a hodgepodge of vehicles and price ranges. I'd narrow your vehicle type and price point first.

I think the XC90 is a great family car. It set the standard for the 7-passenger crossover SUV back in ~2003, and I think it has done it again. The only thing is I'm not a fan of their 4cyl cross the board engine lineup. I'd feel much better with a 6cyl NA or turbo under the hood.

If you have kids, I'd stay away from the 3. Overall it's a great car but at the end of the day it's not a very large car. I don't have kids and the 3 seems just to small. I'm very happy with the size of my 5-series. 7 is too big and now you're getting into a much more expensive car to buy and maintain.

My friend just bought a brand new A7 3.0T S-Line. It's a pretty sweet ride. I've never been a huge fan of the A6. The A8 despite not being the best flagship out there (hard to be an S-Class) is probably my top pick.

Honestly I'm not too sure about the Jag route. Depreciation is very possibly a concern depending on how long you keep your car. New ones IMO are too expensive for what they are. One of my bosses has one, it's a nice car, but I think you get a lot more for your money with the Germans. And if you're looking for AWD you have to look for a pretty new one. Even then, it seems the AWD models are not nearly as pravalent as other makes.

Again I think you need to narrow down what you're looking for. There's a big cost of ownership difference between an entry level sedan and flagship model.
So price range they are all similar (other than the Q50 which is pretty much out - I just think it looks nice :D ). I am looking pre-owned only. it is the year range that will vary a lot here to keep in say the $50-55k price range.

The Jag I would have to wait about 6 months or so for depreciation to bring them down to that, but they are very heavy on depreciation which worries me. Here in the north east all you get are AWD Jags! Issue is not found any used with the technology package and the driver assist package.

I want to keep the car under warranty for a few years. I do <12k per year, I work from home mostly so low usage in general. Running costs not too much of an issue if under warranty for major repairs.

No kids yet, but possible. The XC90 is a fantastic car, just not sure it is for me, too big. V90 however... (but not out yet, if I wait a year that is a possibility for sure as ticks pretty much every box for me).

I need to drive some more of these to narrow it down.
 

D.T.

macrumors G4
Original poster
Sep 15, 2011
11,050
12,467
Vilano Beach, FL
A good friend of mine who picked up a C7 several months ago just sold it ... for what, I do _not_ know yet, but he's dropped a few hints, I'm going over tomorrow to check it out (and drink some good craft beers, hang by the fire pit, whatever :) )
 

2298754

Cancelled
Jun 21, 2010
4,890
941
http://www.autoblog.com/2016/11/16/2017-mazda-cx-5-diesel-details/

Mazda is finally bringing diesels to the US!

Mazda has been talking about bringing a diesel to the US since the current Mazda 6 debuted. It's been delayed, delayed some more, and then seemingly forgotten, but now comes word that the diesel four-cylinder will arrive here in the second half of 2017. It's just coming in the CX-5 first, not the 6 sedan.

The diesel in question is Mazda's Skyactiv-D 2.2-liter four, which makes 173 horsepower and 310 pound-feet of torque in other models. Putting it in a small crossover makes some sense, especially considering the recent announcement of a diesel Chevy Equinox.

It's good news for choice and another sign that the diesel scandal brewhaha's effect on diesel decisions is blowing over. If it works in the CX-5, we may see this option spread throughout the Mazda lineup. Now if only someone could make a case for that rotary...
 

2298754

Cancelled
Jun 21, 2010
4,890
941
LA auto show is going on right now. Some interesting cars being shown off

All-new Mazda CX-5 (with a diesel): Looks really good. Slightly different from the current one.

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/11/15/2017-mazda-cx-5-new-red-la-auto-show-837/

2-all-new-cx-5-studio-na-4-1.jpg


2-all-new-cx-5-studio-na-7-1.jpg


2-all-new-cx-5-studio-na-3-1.jpg


4-all-new-cx-5-interior-na-1-1.jpg


4-all-new-cx-5-interior-na-3-1.jpg

[doublepost=1479343855][/doublepost]
Why not the CX-7?

They don't make that anymore. It's CX3 (HRV sized), CX5 (CRV sized), and CX9 (Highlander/Pilot sized)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0388631

0388631

Cancelled
Sep 10, 2009
9,669
10,823
Looks like the CX-7 now, but smaller, hence the name difference. Mazda really ought to work out their road noise issues from within. In a review I watched months ago on the new CX-7, it was stated that road noise was still an issue in the new car, despite the quieter engine.
 

2298754

Cancelled
Jun 21, 2010
4,890
941
http://www.autoblog.com/2016/11/16/2018-alfa-romeo-stelvio-quadrifoglio-la-auto-show-4/

Alfa Romeo Stevio SUV: I think it looks much better than the sedan

AR018_029ST.jpg


01-2018-alfa-romeo-stelvio-la-1.jpg


03-2018-alfa-romeo-stelvio-la-1.jpg


AR-311169998.jpg


V2-311169998.jpg


  • Alfa Romeo unveils its first SUV at the Los Angeles Auto Show - in Quadrifoglio guise.
  • "Meccanica delle emozioni" in a SUV with striking design, performance and technology, which encapsulates the authentic Alfa Romeo spirit.
  • A name that conjures up legendary achievements on Italy's highest mountain pass.
  • Italian styling, expressing proportion, simplicity and high-quality surfacing.
  • Powered by the 510 HP 2.9-litre V6 BiTurbo petrol engine inspired by Ferrari technologies and technical know-how.
  • All-wheel drive with Q4 technology designed to manage the car's drive distribution in real time.
  • Unique, ground-breaking technical solutions, including Torque Vectoring technology, for the utmost control of traction, and the Integrated Brake System, which significantly reduces braking distance on any road surface.
  • An exhilarating driving experience thanks to the exclusive architecture of the AlfaLinkTM suspension, perfect weight distribution and an outstanding power-to-weight ratio.
  • Alfa Romeo has confirmed that the Stelvio engine range will include the 280 HP 2.0-litre Turbo petrol with 8-speed automatic transmission.
 

2298754

Cancelled
Jun 21, 2010
4,890
941
http://www.autoblog.com/2016/11/15/2018-audi-a5-s5-sportbacks-9745-america/

Audi A/S5 Sportbacks coming to the US: so basically a baby A/S7

01-2018-audi-s5-sportback-la-1.jpg


03-2018-audi-s5-sportback-la-1.jpg


04-2018-audi-s5-sportback-la-1.jpg


12-2018-audi-s5-sportback-la-1.jpg


14-2018-audi-s5-sportback-la-1.jpg


a169136-large-1.jpg


a169137-large-1.jpg


While we will be getting the hatchback, we won't get every powertrain option offered in Europe. Those versions will be offered with an array of gas and dieselengines, and some will be available with a manual transmission. We'll only get two engines here, and they both come with automatics. The standard A5 Sportback will come with the same turbocharged four-cylinder as the A5 coupe and convertible and the A4 sedan. It makes 252 horsepower and 273 pound-feet of torque of torque and is paired with a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission.

The S5 Sportback gets the same 354-horsepower turbocharged V6, which also makes 369 lb-ft of torque and sends power through a conventional 8-speed automatic. Both Sportback models are nearly as fast as their two-door siblings, reaching 60 mph in 5.7 and 4.5 seconds respectively. That's just a tenth of a second slower than either coupe. The Sportback also has one more difference compared with the European version. All American A5 Sportback models will come with Audi's Quattro all-wheel-drive.
[doublepost=1479344337][/doublepost]Jaguar I-Pace concept previews all-electric SUV for 2018

What an improvement over all the lame looking EVs being put out by Tesla and other OEMs

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/11/14/jaguar-i-pace-concept-4867-all-electric-suv-2018/

01-jaguar-i-pace-concept-la-1.jpg


03-jaguar-i-pace-concept-la-1.jpg


04-jaguar-i-pace-concept-la-1.jpg


That's all changed. Jaguar is promising to turn its I-Pace concept SUV into a full-fledged production crossover SUV within two years. It's Jaguar's way of leaping from internal-combustion power, clean over the top of plug-in hybrids, straight to zero-emission battery-electric vehicles. It says a lot about Jaguar's focus that the second SUV in its production history will also be its first electric car. It debuts this week at the Los Angeles auto show.

"Electric vehicles are inevitable – Jaguar will make them desirable. Zero emission cars are here to stay and the I-PACE Concept is at the cutting edge of the electric vehicle revolution," Jaguar's vehicle line director Ian Hoban said. "As the charging infrastructure continues to develop globally – and with enough range to mean most people would only need to charge once a week – cars like the I-PACE Concept will make drivers appreciate that an EV can be rewarding and practical enough to drive every day."

The second-ever SUV from the pen of long-time Jaguar Scribbler-In-Chief Ian Callum, the I-Pace retains a conventionally large grille and still manages to slash its drag coefficient to just 0.29. "This isn't just a concept. It is a preview of a five-seat production car that will be on the road in 2018," Callum said. "This will be Jaguar's first-ever battery-powered electric vehicle and opens a new chapter in the history of our brand.

The car rides on a long 117.72-inch wheelbase, with the double-wishbone front end design lifted from the conventionally-powered F-Pace SUV and a five-link rear suspension system. It derives the management of its on- and off-road all-wheel drive setups from the F-Pace's software.
 

quagmire

macrumors 604
Apr 19, 2004
6,986
2,493
So finally had a chance to go a test drive a Camaro SS with the manual transmission. I also treated today as the final test drives of the car as I drove both the 8 speed auto along with the manual.

Drove an automatic 2SS first to get used to the car again. It had the magnetic ride suspension and dual mode exhaust. Drove the way I remembered( amazing). The LT1 is in my opinion the better sounding engine than the Coyote. Not going to get to much into it in this post since I already detailed my thoughts on it. So now onto the manual transmission....

The manual transmission car was a 1SS with only the dual mode exhaust. So it had normal dampers which was perfect because I did also wanted to see how the Camaro drove on the standard SS suspension. The Tremec in the Camaro is a whole lot better than the stick that is in the Mustang GT. Like I posted before, the Mustang GT would buck when getting the car moving and in the 1-2 shift. Now that is still mostly my fault being inexperienced and I am sure @D.T. will come back saying he doesn't have those issues with his GT, but the only issue I had with the Camaro was bucking with getting the car moving. The 1-2 shifts were smooth. Later after I gave my mom a chance to drive the Camaro, we figured out why I had such an issue with getting it going and having it buck. I was just popping the clutch out too soon. After that, launches were a lot smoother. Pretty sure if I would go and drive the GT again, probably could solve the bucking getting it started issue at least since I was probably doing the same thing( couldn't change drivers in the Mustang because the Ford dealer kept their Mustangs with no freaking gas in the tank so had to keep the trips short).

I absolutely loved the rev-matching feature the manual transmission has just for the sound. Downshift and the car automatically blips the throttle and sounds freaking amazing. Hill starting was a bit of an issue, but decided to use the parking brake trick to help out. Since the parking brake is electronic, just set it when you come to a stop at a red light and when it turns green, you can just release the brake without worry of rollback and the parking brake will automatically disengage when it senses forward motion.

I did stall it a few times at the beginning and I apologize to the one person that was behind me after I stalled it twice in a row.... Three things I didn't like about the manual transmission. First, it is hard to find 5th gear. When I first got in the car, I just rowed it through all the gears just to see where the gates were, and I went to go to 5th gear and consistently found reverse instead. Which goes into the second complaint.... There is no manual form of reverse lockout. All the sticks I have driven had a way you had to move the shifter to put it into reverse( whether it was to push down on the shifter or pull up). Now I am sure the Tremec does have a reverse lock out as I was driving it, I would go all the way over to the right I obviously didn't destroy reverse by mistakingly shift into it looking for 5th, it would stop and I would push up to put it into 5th gear. So when the car starts moving, I bet it automatically will open/close a solenoid that blocks the shifter from going into reverse. I would like the manual lockout where I would have to do something to get it into reverse. But it would be something I would get used to. Though when I wanted fifth, I was very conscious about shifting into reverse by mistake so much, I would end up downshifting back into 3rd gear( benefit of the rev-matching feature was being able to immediately know I downshifted to 3rd instead of upshifting to 5th as I heard the car blipping the throttle). Third thing I hated is the classic 1-4 skip shift feature. As soon as the car would be out of warranty, would get a skip-shift eliminator.


Side note on the experience, the magnetic ride suspension is absolutely worth the money. As noted above, the manual transmission car didn't have mag ride. Went on the same roads and hit the same bumps as we did with the automatic car that had mag ride. The standard suspension isn't horrible. But the car was able to absorb the bumps better with the magnetic dampers even in track mode. You could absolutely tell the difference. Who knows if there is a noticeable change in times on a track, but the magnetic ride control certainly helps with making the Camaro a better daily driver.

Come February or so, all I will have to do is walk in, negotiate the deal, and order the car. I am still leaning towards the automatic. I had an absolute blast in the manual transmission Camaro and AFM is disabled in the manual transmission version. I am not against it per se, but the Gen IV Small Blocks had oil burning issues which went away if the person disabled AFM. Not sure if GM fixed it with the Gen V Small Blocks, but it would be one less issue..... But as I was driving the car, I definitely was more focused on shifting, the clutch, etc than operating the rest of the vehicle( sorry to the person I blinded with my high beams). Now I am sure this would go away as I get 1-2 weeks of experience under my belt and it would become second nature. The big issue though is still what I posted a few pages back. Will I still enjoy the manual transmission 5-7 years down the road and will I be able to tolerate stop and go traffic with it? It is a very easy manual transmission car to drive now that I figured out how to initially get the car moving, but doesn't change the fact stop and go won't be fun. And the fact I am constantly checking behind me cursing the people who stop right on my bumper giving me no room for any potential roll back......

Still got 3 months to decide. And if I do end up keeping the Saturn, would definitely tip the scale towards the manual transmission. But if it will be my daily driver, I think I would still choose the automatic transmission.
 

bunnspecial

macrumors G3
May 3, 2014
8,353
6,496
Kentucky
Every manual has its quirks and after a week or two of driving you won't notice them. Jerking when you shift is pretty much always the result of poor clutch work regardless of the car. This can be especially true when you have as much torque on tap as you do with a big V8. Again, you get used to it after driving the car a little while.

People use to survive without a reverse lock-out. The only thing the MG transmissions have is a spring-loaded plunger in the reverse gate that doesn't take that much force to overcome. If you don't know the transmission, you can pretty easily overshoot a 3rd to 2nd downshift and get an ear-splitting grind.
 

quagmire

macrumors 604
Apr 19, 2004
6,986
2,493
Every manual has its quirks and after a week or two of driving you won't notice them. Jerking when you shift is pretty much always the result of poor clutch work regardless of the car. This can be especially true when you have as much torque on tap as you do with a big V8. Again, you get used to it after driving the car a little while.

People use to survive without a reverse lock-out. The only thing the MG transmissions have is a spring-loaded plunger in the reverse gate that doesn't take that much force to overcome. If you don't know the transmission, you can pretty easily overshoot a 3rd to 2nd downshift and get an ear-splitting grind.

No doubt the jerking is my fault. But the Tremec is more forgiving than the MT-82 that is in the Mustang. The 1-2 shifts in the Mustang would always result in a buck. Never did I get the Camaro to buck with a 1-2 shift despite my poor clutch work. Like you said though, over time I would probably be able to "tame" the Mustang as I get used to the transmission and improve my clutch work. But I do find the Tremec to be the easier manual to drive between the two.
 
Last edited:

A.Goldberg

macrumors 68030
Jan 31, 2015
2,549
9,715
Boston
It sounds to me like most of your issues here are due to your inexperience/unfamiliarity of driving an manual transmission. As Bunn states these are all things you get used to. Stalling and lurching and bucking is pretty common until you figure out the ratio of couch to gas. Two different cars are going to have a different feel. Sports cars in my experience require a bit more finess than some old slogbox truck or car.

A quick google search shows the Camero has an interlock for R over 5mph forward, it seems silly they would not. This is another thing, after you get acquainted with the car you won't be worrying about. Muscle memory takes over. The only problem you might have is when you switch to a different car. Kinda like how I try and put my GF's Volvo in reverse by moving the shifter forward (thanks BMW).

Personally, if I was buying a sports car (muscle car, wtf you want to call it) I'd go with the manual. If I was looking for practicality I'd get an automatic and sedan for the extra space. No matter how good an automatic, the manual shift mode is never as fun as a manual not having a clutch. I don't understand this auto Rev matching nonsense, that's part of the fun of driving a manual!

Unless you're dead set on an auto, I might consider getting more acquainted with the manual gearboxes. I guess the other thing to consider is how much heavy traffic will you be driving in regularly? You're from Mass too, right? My commute is 6 miles and can easily take 45min in rush hour starting in Brookline (pretty suburban, not downtown Boston), headed outbound, not utilizing any highways. A standard would suck 90% of the time. If you're not planning on driving in such a dense area, maybe not a big problem.

Anyways, big thing here is learning to drive stick proficiently- nothing against you or your driving aptitude, it's just unrealistic to anyone pick up the skill after just a handful of driving experiences. But obviously at the end of the day it's whatever you're more comfortable with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bunnspecial

bunnspecial

macrumors G3
May 3, 2014
8,353
6,496
Kentucky
A quick google search shows the Camero has an interlock for R over 5mph forward, it seems silly they would not. This is another thing, after you get acquainted with the car you won't be worrying about. Muscle memory takes over. The only problem you might have is when you switch to a different car. Kinda like how I try and put my GF's Volvo in reverse by moving the shifter forward (thanks BMW).

My MG is the only m/t I drive regularly anymore, and MGs in general are amost the only m/t cars I drive(I've looked at test driven my fair share of local cars that a friend in another part of the country is interested in). Pretty much all MG transmissions-with the exception of the Midget 1500-are the same. 1st is center forward, and then the rest are in an H pattern going off to the right. Reverse is left and back-the same place where 2nd is on most other cars.

I've probably set up other folks for the same since I've taught a couple of people how to drive a manual in the MG. With less than 1K on the new clutch and throwout bearing, I'm suspending lessons for now :) .

I have to really pay attention when I'm driving a car with a "normal" 5 or 6 speed because I often find myself trying to start in 3rd. As you said, it's muscle memory and where my hand goes for 1st gear out of habit. If I had something with a more "normal" shift pattern I'm sure it wouldn't take me long to drive it without thinking-after all I had to "unlearn" that when I got the MG.

BTW, the last manual car either of my parents had was my dad's 1980 Porsche 924 that he got rid of in 2000 or sometime around there-a couple of years before I started driving. If I'd learned on that car, I would have really been messed up since it had the infamous "dogleg" transmission where reverse is left and forward and 1st is left and back. It actually makes a lot of sense since the 2-3rd shift and 4th-5th shift are on the same axis, but I'm sure it can really mess up someone learning to drive.

But yeah, I agree that rev matching and all the other tricks like hill assist take some of the fun out of it. I remember how proud I was when I was learning to drive a manual and I managed to downshift without jerking. I learned on an old Ford truck that had the foot-operated parking brake, so learned to do a hill start with only the clutch and gas. It's still how I start on hills. I've never developed the muscle memory to do a handbrake start, but as long as I don't have some other problem with the car(the MG is British-it happens) I don't remember the last time I stalled on a hill or even had any significant rollback. With that said, a lot of that IS knowing a particular car well enough to "grab" just right with the clutch.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mgguy

0388631

Cancelled
Sep 10, 2009
9,669
10,823
They don't make that anymore. It's CX3 (HRV sized), CX5 (CRV sized), and CX9 (Highlander/Pilot sized)
You're right. I had a brain spasm yesterday. I meant the CX-9. Which I saw in a low trim over the summer, I think, and it looked great. Hopefully Mazda puts in the R&D effort and becomes one of the top 3 Japanese players seeing as Nissan/Infiniti bowed out a long time ago.
 

quagmire

macrumors 604
Apr 19, 2004
6,986
2,493
It sounds to me like most of your issues here are due to your inexperience/unfamiliarity of driving an manual transmission. As Bunn states these are all things you get used to. Stalling and lurching and bucking is pretty common until you figure out the ratio of couch to gas. Two different cars are going to have a different feel. Sports cars in my experience require a bit more finess than some old slogbox truck or car.

A quick google search shows the Camero has an interlock for R over 5mph forward, it seems silly they would not. This is another thing, after you get acquainted with the car you won't be worrying about. Muscle memory takes over. The only problem you might have is when you switch to a different car. Kinda like how I try and put my GF's Volvo in reverse by moving the shifter forward (thanks BMW).

Personally, if I was buying a sports car (muscle car, wtf you want to call it) I'd go with the manual. If I was looking for practicality I'd get an automatic and sedan for the extra space. No matter how good an automatic, the manual shift mode is never as fun as a manual not having a clutch. I don't understand this auto Rev matching nonsense, that's part of the fun of driving a manual!

Unless you're dead set on an auto, I might consider getting more acquainted with the manual gearboxes. I guess the other thing to consider is how much heavy traffic will you be driving in regularly? You're from Mass too, right? My commute is 6 miles and can easily take 45min in rush hour starting in Brookline (pretty suburban, not downtown Boston), headed outbound, not utilizing any highways. A standard would suck 90% of the time. If you're not planning on driving in such a dense area, maybe not a big problem.

Anyways, big thing here is learning to drive stick proficiently- nothing against you or your driving aptitude, it's just unrealistic to anyone pick up the skill after just a handful of driving experiences. But obviously at the end of the day it's whatever you're more comfortable with.

And I absolutely agree with that. I should have stated that again in that post like I did with the Mustang post I made. 99% of my issues with the manual( either the Tremec and MT-82) are due to my inexperience and will probably take owning one to properly gain the skill/proficiency. The 5th gear issue will go away once I trust the lockout as I was very consciously trying to avoid an inadvertent shift into reverse at 40 MPH. About the only legitimate gripe about the manual in the SS is the stupid 1-4 skip shift. I was consistently smoothly launching the Camaro after we figured out what I was doing wrong and never stalled it.

I live in the DC area. My commute takes me on the Beltway and it is is hell during rush hour. I only have to be on the beltway for 4 miles, but during rush hour it can take 30-40 minutes to get to my exit. Combine the fact you have idiots cutting over, etc I would probably lose my mind as I try to keep aware of my surroundings and focusing on the shifting, etc.

If the SS wasn't going to be a daily driver, absolutely manual would most likely be my choice. I am still considering the manual, leaning auto, but the stick is still being considered( like I said, had an absolute blast with it despite also being nervous driving it on public roads).

As for the rev matching feature.... I loved it simply for the sound of the engine when it blipped the throttle, nothing else. The LT1 with the exhaust valves fully open( track mode) sounds freaking fantastic.

As for a sedan, if I needed four doors, a rear seat, and trunk, the SS sedan would be my choice right now. My Aura's backseat though is in pristine condition because I probably could count on one hand how many people sat in the back seat in the cars 10 year history. Heck, my preferred car would be a Corvette Stingray Z51, but that car is way outside of my budget. Not that the Camaro SS is a compromise though.
 
Last edited:

PowerMac G4 MDD

macrumors 68000
Jul 13, 2014
1,900
277
This got a heart chuckle out of me. Is it a lane change/lane assist vibration? Those are usually on the wheel but it makes sense to put it somewhere that isn't easily affected by road vibration, seeing as the Suburban is still using traditional PS and not EPS?

Chevy's an awful brand, but they make their SUVs very well. They'll last a few hundred thousand miles if taken care of.

Very nice truck brand indeed, but I am not so impressed with the majority of their other vehicles. Hmm... I believe that it's a lane assist thing, but it also goes off if you are about to back into something (or if it THINKS that). It's incredibly invasive and a bit startling. It's not a subtle vibration either - it's a rattling movement at the heart of the seat.

One time, it went off when I didn't even know why. I've had that happen in an Equinox, but it was an ear-piercing beep instead of a vibration. That time, there was literally nobody else on the open road. These safety features are good for n00bs, but I dislike such invasive tactics otherwise. I wish there were a 'I-drove-just-fine-before-these-features-even-existed-in-most-cars' button, with memory.

That and the brakes are somewhat poor, but the rest of the truck is very nice - I'm impressed. The magnetic suspension is a huge relief. The electronic power steering is also not bad, but I still don't really care for electronic power steering in the first place.
[doublepost=1479453143][/doublepost]http://www.carscoops.com/2016/11/cadillacs-escala-concept-is-sharp.html

New concept for Cadillac. Not a big fan of Cadillacs, but I found the interior interesting. First off, I'm envisioning all cars having these types of interiors in the near future. A nice-enough 10 year-old car, at this point, has a relatively new-looking dash in comparison to most today, but that's been changing. I'm very attracting to this type of dashboard. Only thing I don't care for is the fact that cars have re-adopted (unless it was never a thing) the continuous center console that compartmentalizes the driver and front passenger seats. It seems like it would be nice, but I feel a bit cramped after a while of riding in a car like that.

Other than the form, the material lining it all is interesting... it's all woven fabric. Nifty, but I could imagine how dirty that would get, especially in the boot. They have the entire rear cargo space lined with it xD. Perhaps a vinyl coating or something would be a good idea. (Although, it's only a concept.)
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.