Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Honestly, the car thread is a different discussion than this. I kind of like the idea of "what do you drive?" with minimal judgement.

2017 Audi A4 Quattro - love the damn thing
[doublepost=1498098554][/doublepost]
I drive a 2009 Mazda Miata because I simply LOVE 2 seater roadsters. :) Unfortunately I am getting too old for such a small low car. :(
Impossible
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brandon123
A Toyota Tacoma pickup truck,
Why?
Because there's no way I could fit the sacks of garden fertilizers and bales of straw, or haul the monthly loads of yard and garden waste to the landfill in a car.
[doublepost=1498109659][/doublepost]
I drive a 2009 Mazda Miata because I simply LOVE 2 seater roadsters. :) Unfortunately I am getting too old for such a small low car. :(
As an 80 yr old I can easily see your point, or better yet feel your pain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brandon123
I bought a 2017 Honda Accord a few weeks ago after my 2008 got totaled on an accident. Why did I but the new one? I love Honda Accords. It's the third one I've owned. The build quality, the features and I just love driving an Accord.
 
What car people drive depends mostly on budget and usage. Or people buy something that doesn't make much sense because they're 'car people', but I doubt you're one of those because you're asking for very general advice here.

You'll have to share something to get good advice! But since this is MacRumors, I'll just go ahead and recommend a car that has Apple CarPlay (so anything from a Ferarri to a VW).

Spot on! I'm mainly interested in hassle-free car ownership. I want a mid-sized car that always (or nearly always at least) works (like my Apple products:)). However, I cannot afford a brand new car, and I don't want a completely boring car. What I like with Apple products is that I get reliability AND fun at the same time, but when it comes to cars it feels like the reverse is the norm. It is the soulless boring cars (Japanese/Korean -not all of them I know, but in general) that are reliable, and the fun and entertaining cars (European/American) are as reliable as a PC:D Or am I completely wrong here? Old stereotypes of car manufacturers?
[doublepost=1498118692][/doublepost]
Exactly.

When my mother bought her car - she had been promoted at work and needed her own car - and one of my brothers and I were at university, while my other brother, who was still at school, could be driven in the family car by my father.

Dad didn't get his sports car until we all were at university. By then, there was no need for a 'family' car, and my parents, having been prudent and responsible all their lives, enjoyed a rare moment of pure self-indulgence.

My mother most enjoyed the envious looks young (and middle aged ) men gave her car, followed by their stupefied expressions when a slightly chubby, middle aged woman emerged from behind the wheel, clearly driving what was her own car, paid for by herself.

I just love this story!
[doublepost=1498119275][/doublepost]
I bought a 2017 Honda Accord a few weeks ago after my 2008 got totaled on an accident. Why did I but the new one? I love Honda Accords. It's the third one I've owned. The build quality, the features and I just love driving an Accord.

I have heard and read a lot of good things about Honda Accords, never driven one though...but I get the impression that they are sportier and more fun to drive than Toyotas, Mazdas etc. They seem to be both reliable and fun, which is what I want in a car. How about costs? Maintenance, repairs etc.? More expensive to own than let's say a Toyota Camry?
 
Spot on! I'm mainly interested in hassle-free car ownership. I want a mid-sized car that always (or nearly always at least) works (like my Apple products:)). However, I cannot afford a brand new car, and I don't want a completely boring car. What I like with Apple products is that I get reliability AND fun at the same time, but when it comes to cars it feels like the reverse is the norm. It is the soulless boring cars (Japanese/Korean -not all of them I know, but in general) that are reliable, and the fun and entertaining cars (European/American) are as reliable as a PC:D Or am I completely wrong here? Old stereotypes of car manufacturers?

What you're mentioning are indeed old stereotypes, but they are still relevant. Sure, as always with stereotyping there're some exceptions, but generally speaking the Asian cars are more reliable than some European/American cars. I like to generalize per country though, I really like most German car manufacturers for example. Best is just to look per model when you're actually going to buy something of course...

Here's a list of reliability by car manufacturer which both confirms stereotypes (Audi, Porsche, BMW) and prove some wrong (VW, Nissan are quite low). Take it with a grain of salt, great for discussions though.

consumer-reports-beste-merken.jpg


I'm proud to say my first car was a Fiat 500 from 1972. Very reliable, no problems whatsoever! :D
 
Spot on! I'm mainly interested in hassle-free car ownership. I want a mid-sized car that always (or nearly always at least) works (like my Apple products:)). However, I cannot afford a brand new car, and I don't want a completely boring car. What I like with Apple products is that I get reliability AND fun at the same time, but when it comes to cars it feels like the reverse is the norm. It is the soulless boring cars (Japanese/Korean -not all of them I know, but in general) that are reliable, and the fun and entertaining cars (European/American) are as reliable as a PC:D Or am I completely wrong here? Old stereotypes of car manufacturers?
[doublepost=1498118692][/doublepost]

I just love this story!
[doublepost=1498119275][/doublepost]

I have heard and read a lot of good things about Honda Accords, never driven one though...but I get the impression that they are sportier and more fun to drive than Toyotas, Mazdas etc. They seem to be both reliable and fun, which is what I want in a car. How about costs? Maintenance, repairs etc.? More expensive to own than let's say a Toyota Camry?
The first Accord that I owned, I bought used with 135,000 miles on it. I drove that car to 223,000 miles with simply changing out the brake pads, oil changes and tires. Nothing else needed to be done with the car. I still have it today and keep it to drive in very bad weather.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brandon123
I have a brand new 2017 Chevy Camaro SS as many of the regulars in this thread already know.

I originally had a 2007 Saturn Aura XR that was my first car. It was just over 10 years old, only had 48,000 miles on it, and was still perfectly reliable. If I could have justified it financially, I would still have it and would still be my daily driver and the Camaro be my weekend car. Why did I get a new car when nothing wrong with the old one? Two things.... I'm saving up for a house and while the car was reliable, I did not want to take the risk of after buying the house, the car all of sudden taking a dump close to spending the money for the house. I can pay off the car and still save quite a bit of money every month for that down payment for the house.

Ok so why splurge on a pricey car like the Camaro SS instead of something more economical and put more money away for said house? I am one of those 'car guys'. I had the opportunity to get a sports car/pony car/sports coupe where I don't need a practical car( should have seen the backseat of my Aura, it still looked brand new from the factory after 10 years) right now. I also don't know when I would have another opportunity to buy such a car. Gas prices will inevitably go back up, stricter fuel economy regulations will drive the cost of a V8 RWD sports car up, etc so I felt the time to experience a V8( let alone a naturally aspirated one with more and more engines going forced inducted due to said regulations) powered car was now.

That's obviously just me, your needs and wants are obviously different. I absolutely would not recommend such a car as your first car. Something like my Aura would be the better choice. Accords and Civics are very good cars that can be fun car to drive( for what they are) if you want something that is somewhat engaging to drive compared to a Corolla and Camry which are absolute snoozefests to drive and are totally isolated from the road.
 
I used to love Chevys and owned several new models from 1993 on. I owned:

1993 Cavalier
1994 Beretta
1995 Camaro
2003 Cavalier
2005 Cobalt
2006 Cobalt SS Supercharged
2008 Cobalt LT

Starting with the Camaro, the Camaro needed a fuel pump a month after driving it off the lot. By the time the car had 75,000 miles on it, it needed a new transmission.
The 2005 Cobalts drivers side door handle had the chrome peeling off it. It also started dying when I would start slowing down at stop lights/signs. Traded it for the 2006 Cobalt. Turn signal indicator also quit canceling after completing turns so I always had to return it to the off position.

The 2006 Cobalt has the chrome peeling off the drivers side door handle. Traded it for the new 2017 Accord a few weeks ago, the Cobalt SS Supercharged had 54,000 miles and I bought it new in 2006. Might have had more problems had I driven it more. Timing chain had to be replaced at 35,000 miles.

2008 Cobalt had the chrome peeling off the drivers side door handle within 6 months.

I also hated that I could look over to the passenger side door and see whatever the paint color was on any of these Chevys and see that color on the inside of the door. Chevy failed to see that maybe it was a good idea to design the inside door panel so it would cover the entire inside door instead of leaving a 1" gap. For instance, the 2003 Cavalier was orange, I could see a 1" strip of orange paint surrounding the entire inside door. Chevy also quit including lights in the glove box and trunk compartments. I just kind of got tired of the Chevy build quality and bought my first Accord in the early 2010s. Don't think I'll ever own another Chevy.

I wish I would have gotten into Hondas a lot sooner. Sure there are even better built cars then Honda but I love my new Accord. It feels right for me. It feels great to drive. I took it out on the highway last Saturday to the mountains and it it felt amazing to drive not to mention it has Car Play and I can also plug in my 160GB iPod Classic and have everything playing display on the cars screen.

Thanks for reading.
 
I have a brand new 2017 Chevy Camaro SS as many of the regulars in this thread already know.

I originally had a 2007 Saturn Aura XR that was my first car. It was just over 10 years old, only had 48,000 miles on it, and was still perfectly reliable. If I could have justified it financially, I would still have it and would still be my daily driver and the Camaro be my weekend car. Why did I get a new car when nothing wrong with the old one? Two things.... I'm saving up for a house and while the car was reliable, I did not want to take the risk of after buying the house, the car all of sudden taking a dump close to spending the money for the house. I can pay off the car and still save quite a bit of money every month for that down payment for the house.

Ok so why splurge on a pricey car like the Camaro SS instead of something more economical and put more money away for said house? I am one of those 'car guys'. I had the opportunity to get a sports car/pony car/sports coupe where I don't need a practical car( should have seen the backseat of my Aura, it still looked brand new from the factory after 10 years) right now. I also don't know when I would have another opportunity to buy such a car. Gas prices will inevitably go back up, stricter fuel economy regulations will drive the cost of a V8 RWD sports car up, etc so I felt the time to experience a V8( let alone a naturally aspirated one with more and more engines going forced inducted due to said regulations) powered car was now.

That's obviously just me, your needs and wants are obviously different. I absolutely would not recommend such a car as your first car. Something like my Aura would be the better choice. Accords and Civics are very good cars that can be fun car to drive( for what they are) if you want something that is somewhat engaging to drive compared to a Corolla and Camry which are absolute snoozefests to drive and are totally isolated from the road.

Congrats on an amazing car, I love Camaros! All of them, from the 60s muscles to 80's Iroc Zs to todays' models. I have never owned one (and probably not the right car for me right now), but driven some of my friends' old classics, a 67 and a 71. The 71 was a 600-700 hp big block monster - the only car that has ever scared the **** out of me:D
[doublepost=1498203576][/doublepost]
I used to love Chevys and owned several new models from 1993 on. I owned:

1993 Cavalier
1994 Beretta
1995 Camaro
2003 Cavalier
2005 Cobalt
2006 Cobalt SS Supercharged
2008 Cobalt LT

Starting with the Camaro, the Camaro needed a fuel pump a month after driving it off the lot. By the time the car had 75,000 miles on it, it needed a new transmission.
The 2005 Cobalts drivers side door handle had the chrome peeling off it. It also started dying when I would start slowing down at stop lights/signs. Traded it for the 2006 Cobalt. Turn signal indicator also quit canceling after completing turns so I always had to return it to the off position.

The 2006 Cobalt has the chrome peeling off the drivers side door handle. Traded it for the new 2017 Accord a few weeks ago, the Cobalt SS Supercharged had 54,000 miles and I bought it new in 2006. Might have had more problems had I driven it more. Timing chain had to be replaced at 35,000 miles.

2008 Cobalt had the chrome peeling off the drivers side door handle within 6 months.

I also hated that I could look over to the passenger side door and see whatever the paint color was on any of these Chevys and see that color on the inside of the door. Chevy failed to see that maybe it was a good idea to design the inside door panel so it would cover the entire inside door instead of leaving a 1" gap. For instance, the 2003 Cavalier was orange, I could see a 1" strip of orange paint surrounding the entire inside door. Chevy also quit including lights in the glove box and trunk compartments. I just kind of got tired of the Chevy build quality and bought my first Accord in the early 2010s. Don't think I'll ever own another Chevy.

I wish I would have gotten into Hondas a lot sooner. Sure there are even better built cars then Honda but I love my new Accord. It feels right for me. It feels great to drive. I took it out on the highway last Saturday to the mountains and it it felt amazing to drive not to mention it has Car Play and I can also plug in my 160GB iPod Classic and have everything playing display on the cars screen.

Thanks for reading.

Thanks for the story! Can I ask what transmission your Accord has? Many Japanese manufacturers seem to switch from conventional automatic gearboxes to CVTs, which kind of worries me (how reliable are they?). And I am even more sceptic about the dual-clutch transmissions many European/American manufacturers have started to use.
 
However, I cannot afford a brand new car, and I don't want a completely boring car.

I have heard and read a lot of good things about Honda Accords, never driven one though...but I get the impression that they are sportier and more fun to drive than Toyotas, Mazdas etc. They seem to be both reliable and fun, which is what I want in a car. How about costs? Maintenance, repairs etc.? More expensive to own than let's say a Toyota Camry?

Fun, reliable, and reasonably affordable is a tricky mix, especially the fun part. Personally, I wouldn't call an Accord "fun" more like super reliable, well built, hold their value, a pretty decent looking in the category of mid-range sedans. If you're looking at something with those attributes but a little more fun, you're probably more into something like a Civic Hatch, a Mazda 3, maybe a 86/BRZ.

I've owned a decent number of cars, many of the "sports" variety, domestics, imports from Japan and Germany, hardtops, convertibles, sedans, 4, 6, 8 cylinders, even with _no_ cylinders :D I tend like to like cars that represent a "best of" for a given class, that provide some kind of exemplary attributes for the vehicle type (even if that's simply, nice, reliable transportation).
 
I tend like to like cars that represent a "best of" for a given class, that provide some kind of exemplary attributes for the vehicle type (even if that's simply, nice, reliable transportation).

That's interesting! However, aren't usually those "best in class" cars very expense on the used car market?
 
Fun, reliable, and reasonably affordable is a tricky mix, especially the fun part. Personally, I wouldn't call an Accord "fun" more like super reliable, well built, hold their value, a pretty decent looking in the category of mid-range sedans. If you're looking at something with those attributes but a little more fun, you're probably more into something like a Civic Hatch, a Mazda 3, maybe a 86/BRZ.

I've owned a decent number of cars, many of the "sports" variety, domestics, imports from Japan and Germany, hardtops, convertibles, sedans, 4, 6, 8 cylinders, even with _no_ cylinders :D I tend like to like cars that represent a "best of" for a given class, that provide some kind of exemplary attributes for the vehicle type (even if that's simply, nice, reliable transportation).
Accord Sport is fairly fun with the manual. Not BRZ fun, which is a lot less practical.
[doublepost=1498243258][/doublepost]
That's interesting! However, aren't usually those "best in class" cars very expense on the used car market?
Not typically. Entry level cars are very affordable on the used market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brandon123
I thought they stopped making the Accord Sport. With Honda dropping the 6 cyl for their Accord, I imagine their reliability in the long term will improve. Honda wasn't really known for having a trouble free 6 cyl. Accord, historically at least. Best in class is relative to what you're looking at, Brandon. The MBZ S Class is the best in class in a lot of criteria, but the Civic is also the best in class for a lot of criteria.

If you can get over the Transformers design, the new Toyota Camry is going to offer a lot of bang for your buck. Especially their new V6 that's slated to put out around 315 HP. As far as I'm concerned, the Toyota will always have the better resale value, not to mention it having a normal transmission and not that CVT junk.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Brandon123 and D.T.
After FAR too long, the MG is back on the road-or at least I drove it a couple of miles yesterday. I'd have driven it more, but it was raining, hot, and I needed to tweak some things that I didn't really feel like fixing at that point.

So, here's sort of the summary, even though I've mentioned specific stuff. This is what you call "project creep."

First of all, I started noticing low compression on one cylinder(#3). This particular cylinder is notorious for burning exhaust valves on B series engines, so I pretty well wrote it off then and put fixing it on the to do list. With that said, I started losing a couple PSI of compression a month, so figured it was a sooner rather than later job.

From there, I had a decision to make. B heads are also notorious for cracking. The particular casting number on my head isn't as bad as some others, but there was probably still a 50% chance of it being cracked. A rehab on it(magnaflux, skim, hardened exhaust seats, and lapping in new valves) would be $250 or so, and there was a chance I'd still be out ~$75 if I took it to the machine shop and magnafluxed it and found a crack.

So, I took the chance to both head that off at the pass and make an upgrade. I located a freshly rehabbed(new valves and hardened seats) 12H2923 head, which is the desirable "big valve" head. These were used on '73-75 engines. Those particular engines have lower compression than the earlier ones(8.0:1 vs. 8.8:1) but that was achieved by actually reducing the combustion chamber volume and fitting deeply dished pistons. What that means is that if you put a late head on a high compression engine with shallow dish pistons, you end up with roughly 9.5:1. That's a nice quick and dirty power gain-it gets the engine into the 110-115 hp range vs. 90 stock.

It SHOULD have been a quick and easy swap...famous last words. I'd figured on about a week, working in the evenings. I should have had the old head off in one evening(there's not a lot going on with a 4 cylinder OHV tractor engine), been able to do the clean up and prep work in one evening, get the new one on and everything back together, and then tuned it up.

Getting the old head off wasn't overly eventful other than forgetting just HOW low I needed to drain the antifreeze, but it came off without a lot of trouble. Similarly, clean up and prep went off without much trouble. I got the new head dropped into place and torqued down, then went to get things set up. Unfortunately, that's where the trouble started.

When I went to tighten down the rocker shaft and then set the valve lash, I found that the even with the micro adjusters backed all the way out, I couldn't get ANY valve lash. In fact, I couldn't get any compression out of the engine as the valves weren't closing all the way. A little bit of measuring showed that the valves on the replacement head have their stems sitting about 200 thousandths higher than stock(I measured two heads I have kicking around).

That sent me down another path of replacing parts to try and make the head I have work. MGB engines came with two different styles of lifters and pushrods. The early ones had "tall" tappets(about 3" tall) with "short" pushrods. The later ones used tiny "bucket" tappets with long(10 1/2") pushrods. The later design is preferred as it's much lighter.

So, I ordered a set of bucket tappets along with some fancy hollow racing pushrods(at $13 each) that came disassembled. The tubular design and the fact that they're hollow meant that I could trim them. Given the valve height difference, I stuck them in the lathe and knocked .250(1/4") off each and put it together.

Unfortunately, THAT combination put me at the other end of valve adjustment and I couldn't get compression. Even if I'd been able to, I wouldn't have been able to put a lock nut on the adjusters, which is a bad thing.

So, out of desperation, I ordered a set of stock 18V(late, long) pushrods to the tune of ~$20 for the set. That put me right back to where I was with not getting any lash.

I went to other options-one of which was to mill the rocker pedestals shorter and use my(too short) push rods, or the other of which was to use the stock push rods and shim the rocker pedestals. I went with the latter.

With some 5 thou brass shim stock and a few minutes on the drill press, I had a set of shims and at last had good compression. I went ahead and bolted everything back together and was able to start the engine on Monday evening. I didn't run it long as I hadn't refilled the cooling system at that point, but I did start it.

With that said, I still wasn't happy with the valve adjustment, as I essentially had no room left for wear. I went hunting for thicker shim material, but couldn't get what I wanted locally. Finally, I broke down and bought some 20 thou brass from McMaster Carr, which came Tuesday. I got the shims made yesterday(they weren't as easy to make as the 5 thou ones), installed them, got the lash set correctly with plenty of room, and fired it up(this time with coolant). That was a joyous moment.

I had to trace down some serious coolant leaks that left steam pouring out of the car :) , but was able to drive for a couple of miles. Of course, it was raining like crazy last night so it overall was a miserable drive(it was too hot to run the heat for very long and I couldn't roll down the windows due to the rain, which meant that I was constantly using a towel to wipe the fog off the inside). Granted it was 7:30, but I'm sure that I had a bunch of banks scratching their heads over their security cameras this morning as that was where I stopped to make on the road tweaks(so I could stay under cover).

About halfway through, though, I started getting a terrible popping sound when I stepped on the gas from the passenger side of the engine. I was afraid it was pinging, so jumped out and backed the timing off but that didn't make a difference. A fresh look today fortunately revealed that one of the grub screws sealing the exhaust ports that would have been attached to the air rail had fallen out meaning that I was hearing an exhaust leak from cylinder #1, so fortunately that was a quick thing to fix.

I still have a fair bit of tuning to do to get it where I want it, but it's amazing how much more pep the car now has. It was just a thrill to get back in the driver's seat of it, though.

Unfortunately, I've also fallen victim to a typical bad part that I'm rather miffed about. I couldn't get my old temperature sender out of the head(I broke it off) and didn't lose much sleep over spending $7 on a new one. I noticed when I was driving it last night that the engine almost at "H", although a check with my IR thermometer showed that temperatures were right where they should be(~200ºF). A bit of searching showed that apparently Moss Motors(largest British parts vendor) has apparently for the past year or so has had the specs reversed on the 68-76 and 77-80 senders. Apparently I "should" have ordered a 77-80 to have it read correctly. NAPA carries the part, so I'm probably going to get it from them and then let Moss hear about the bad one. Let's face it-I've spent a small fortune with them in the time I've owned the car and this is the only part I've really had an issue with(or enough of an issue to complain) so I don't think that's too much of a concern. I just dread changing it as I know I'll make a mess doing it(it screws directly through the head into the water passage under the thermostat).
 
-we moved back into the city
-we have a large garage for a city property but own 4 vehicles
-I can almost walk to work, not quite, take the lite rail
-the weather here is nice but can vary; early this week it was 100F and Friday its 65F

i would be interested in buying a used vehicle to better match our needs, sell off everything else. They used to make a micro size Honda Civic-VX or Honda Beat but starting late 1990's automobiles started to bloat out. Difficult to justify a SUV when 45 mph is fast.

Just keep what we have.
 
After FAR too long, the MG is back on the road-or at least I drove it a couple of miles yesterday. I'd have driven it more, but it was raining, hot, and I needed to tweak some things that I didn't really feel like fixing at that point.

So, here's sort of the summary, even though I've mentioned specific stuff. This is what you call "project creep."

First of all, I started noticing low compression on one cylinder(#3). This particular cylinder is notorious for burning exhaust valves on B series engines, so I pretty well wrote it off then and put fixing it on the to do list. With that said, I started losing a couple PSI of compression a month, so figured it was a sooner rather than later job.

From there, I had a decision to make. B heads are also notorious for cracking. The particular casting number on my head isn't as bad as some others, but there was probably still a 50% chance of it being cracked. A rehab on it(magnaflux, skim, hardened exhaust seats, and lapping in new valves) would be $250 or so, and there was a chance I'd still be out ~$75 if I took it to the machine shop and magnafluxed it and found a crack.

So, I took the chance to both head that off at the pass and make an upgrade. I located a freshly rehabbed(new valves and hardened seats) 12H2923 head, which is the desirable "big valve" head. These were used on '73-75 engines. Those particular engines have lower compression than the earlier ones(8.0:1 vs. 8.8:1) but that was achieved by actually reducing the combustion chamber volume and fitting deeply dished pistons. What that means is that if you put a late head on a high compression engine with shallow dish pistons, you end up with roughly 9.5:1. That's a nice quick and dirty power gain-it gets the engine into the 110-115 hp range vs. 90 stock.

It SHOULD have been a quick and easy swap...famous last words. I'd figured on about a week, working in the evenings. I should have had the old head off in one evening(there's not a lot going on with a 4 cylinder OHV tractor engine), been able to do the clean up and prep work in one evening, get the new one on and everything back together, and then tuned it up.

Getting the old head off wasn't overly eventful other than forgetting just HOW low I needed to drain the antifreeze, but it came off without a lot of trouble. Similarly, clean up and prep went off without much trouble. I got the new head dropped into place and torqued down, then went to get things set up. Unfortunately, that's where the trouble started.

When I went to tighten down the rocker shaft and then set the valve lash, I found that the even with the micro adjusters backed all the way out, I couldn't get ANY valve lash. In fact, I couldn't get any compression out of the engine as the valves weren't closing all the way. A little bit of measuring showed that the valves on the replacement head have their stems sitting about 200 thousandths higher than stock(I measured two heads I have kicking around).

That sent me down another path of replacing parts to try and make the head I have work. MGB engines came with two different styles of lifters and pushrods. The early ones had "tall" tappets(about 3" tall) with "short" pushrods. The later ones used tiny "bucket" tappets with long(10 1/2") pushrods. The later design is preferred as it's much lighter.

So, I ordered a set of bucket tappets along with some fancy hollow racing pushrods(at $13 each) that came disassembled. The tubular design and the fact that they're hollow meant that I could trim them. Given the valve height difference, I stuck them in the lathe and knocked .250(1/4") off each and put it together.

Unfortunately, THAT combination put me at the other end of valve adjustment and I couldn't get compression. Even if I'd been able to, I wouldn't have been able to put a lock nut on the adjusters, which is a bad thing.

So, out of desperation, I ordered a set of stock 18V(late, long) pushrods to the tune of ~$20 for the set. That put me right back to where I was with not getting any lash.

I went to other options-one of which was to mill the rocker pedestals shorter and use my(too short) push rods, or the other of which was to use the stock push rods and shim the rocker pedestals. I went with the latter.

With some 5 thou brass shim stock and a few minutes on the drill press, I had a set of shims and at last had good compression. I went ahead and bolted everything back together and was able to start the engine on Monday evening. I didn't run it long as I hadn't refilled the cooling system at that point, but I did start it.

With that said, I still wasn't happy with the valve adjustment, as I essentially had no room left for wear. I went hunting for thicker shim material, but couldn't get what I wanted locally. Finally, I broke down and bought some 20 thou brass from McMaster Carr, which came Tuesday. I got the shims made yesterday(they weren't as easy to make as the 5 thou ones), installed them, got the lash set correctly with plenty of room, and fired it up(this time with coolant). That was a joyous moment.

I had to trace down some serious coolant leaks that left steam pouring out of the car :) , but was able to drive for a couple of miles. Of course, it was raining like crazy last night so it overall was a miserable drive(it was too hot to run the heat for very long and I couldn't roll down the windows due to the rain, which meant that I was constantly using a towel to wipe the fog off the inside). Granted it was 7:30, but I'm sure that I had a bunch of banks scratching their heads over their security cameras this morning as that was where I stopped to make on the road tweaks(so I could stay under cover).

About halfway through, though, I started getting a terrible popping sound when I stepped on the gas from the passenger side of the engine. I was afraid it was pinging, so jumped out and backed the timing off but that didn't make a difference. A fresh look today fortunately revealed that one of the grub screws sealing the exhaust ports that would have been attached to the air rail had fallen out meaning that I was hearing an exhaust leak from cylinder #1, so fortunately that was a quick thing to fix.

I still have a fair bit of tuning to do to get it where I want it, but it's amazing how much more pep the car now has. It was just a thrill to get back in the driver's seat of it, though.

Unfortunately, I've also fallen victim to a typical bad part that I'm rather miffed about. I couldn't get my old temperature sender out of the head(I broke it off) and didn't lose much sleep over spending $7 on a new one. I noticed when I was driving it last night that the engine almost at "H", although a check with my IR thermometer showed that temperatures were right where they should be(~200ºF). A bit of searching showed that apparently Moss Motors(largest British parts vendor) has apparently for the past year or so has had the specs reversed on the 68-76 and 77-80 senders. Apparently I "should" have ordered a 77-80 to have it read correctly. NAPA carries the part, so I'm probably going to get it from them and then let Moss hear about the bad one. Let's face it-I've spent a small fortune with them in the time I've owned the car and this is the only part I've really had an issue with(or enough of an issue to complain) so I don't think that's too much of a concern. I just dread changing it as I know I'll make a mess doing it(it screws directly through the head into the water passage under the thermostat).
The joy of owning an older car! I work with a guy who has a TVR. It's off the road more than it's on.
In fact I've only seen it once and I've worked with him 10 years!

Sadly he's now completely neglecting it as he has bought a Porsche 914 that he's doing up.
 
Best in class is relative to what you're looking at, Brandon.

Exactly. Mid-sized pickup? Hands down, a Tacoma, with the 4L V6. That's not a super expensive vehicle (though they do hold their value), but there's nothing better in that class for any price.

After FAR too long, the MG is back on the road-or at least I drove it a couple of miles yesterday. I'd have driven it more, but it was raining, hot, and I needed to tweak some things that I didn't really feel like fixing at that point.

So, here's sort of the summary, even though I've mentioned specific stuff. This is what you call "project creep."

Fantastic! I mean, not the issues so much (though you resolved some of those easily enough), just the time, effort and enthusiasm with this kind of project.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A.Goldberg
Exactly. Mid-sized pickup? Hands down, a Tacoma, with the 4L V6. That's not a super expensive vehicle (though they do hold their value), but there's nothing better in that class for any price.
Indeed. You can also a mod an old one to sell tacos out of.
 
Fantastic! I mean, not the issues so much (though you resolved some of those easily enough), just the time, effort and enthusiasm with this kind of project.

Thanks. I love driving the car, but at the same time owning has really been a great experience for me.

I've learned far more about what makes cars "tick" than I could have any other way, but at the same time it's a simple enough car that I can actually fix most anything on it with nothing more than some hand tools.

Even though this project was frustrating, I'm ultimately happy with the result and the extra pep(and low end torque) from the engine is well worth the time and the cost. Even though I know the carbs are WAY out of tune, it's still amazing how much of a difference it made in my one quick test drive.

BTW, one quick and dirty way to spot a change in running conditions on a carbureted car is a change in the idle speed. I normally keep the idle in the 900-1000 range. If, for example, one is adjusting the mixture an increase in the idle speed indicates that the mixture is getting closer to correct(while the reverse is true). When I just dropped everything back together without changing the carb settings or timing, it idled at about 1500 rpms. That's a good sign right off hand.

I also have to mention that the MG community is great, and I had a lot of help from two of the top MG mechanics in the country in getting the this going. I can't think John Twist and Dick Mortitz enough for their help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A.Goldberg
Just thought I'd give the regulars in this thread an update on our Equinox order!

Should be here within the next 6-8 weeks. Apparently the VW scandal has delayed all EPA certifications. ugh. Our dealership has been great. We were able to get them to throw in some all-weather mats for free due to the delay.

In other news, I recently got to drive a new 2017 Malibu Premier. What a handful car IRL. I love the clean design. The rear-end design reminds me of an Audi. The interior is even nicer than my friend's 2016 Lexus IS350! Better infotainment system too.

2016_chevrolet_malibu_sedan_premier_fq_oem_4_400.jpg


2017-Chevrolet-Malibu-Premier-Interior.jpg

[doublepost=1498431433][/doublepost]Also has anyone seen the new Camry? Yuck. The sport model even has quad-exhausts...

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2018-toyota-camry-first-drive-review

2018-toyota-camry-inline1-photo-684058-s-original.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinIllini
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.