Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The New New Doctor Who

My POV:

So in that traditionally English way, our new Who is less Revolution and more Glorious. What Moffat does well in The Beast Below is what he's been doing well in the Nu Series for years: tapping directly into childhood horrors (masks, being eaten by a monster "under the bed," mechanical villains), witticisms, irreverence, astute humour, twisty plotting. I guess now he's just able to do it on his own terms. I'd like to give Moffat more credit here, particularly for (at last) writing a Doctor that does not feel instantly guilty and responsible for his companion's safety. Early in the episode he tells Amy to follow Mandy deep into a city which he is sure is both a police state and in some way treacherous. Giving her this task speeds up the plot by cutting out erstwhile obligatory emotions (although we still get the "oh my GOD I'm in space" moments), and it also bolsters our confidence in Amy's role as a lead character. Nice.

I've heard it remarked that this episode is, at last, Moffat In Charge, but he continues to water dead plants. The "last of his kind" angst that plagued Doctor #9 is still wretchedly attached to the ankle of the Doctor's character by its decaying teeth, and as a concept has not been altered or addressed in any worthwhile way since ever. I thought after The End of Time the Doctor might actually be GLAD he was the last, after being kicked in the head with the simple reality that his race are a bunch of arrogant, plot-pushing twunts and Timothy Dalton. To have it rear its head again is a disappointment, because I was at least hoping he'd have had enough Time Lord for the Time Being. To address the point, though, the Beast Below shares a second-episode philosophy with Russel Davies's The End of the World, which I think is both no mistake and suggests that we are not yet out of the big guy's shadow.

I felt I had to endure more than I should to appreciate the intelligence that Moffat brings to the enterprise (has Russel ever written a smarter line than "and once ever five years everyone chooses to forget what they've learned... democracy in action!"). Murray's music provides a stereotypically lobotomic experience, the colors are a comic-book, and other minor quibbles. There were parts of the design that I loved in this episode, but first I'm going to complain about the hyperbole. Slay me now. I think that for the most part Moffat handles exposition and information delivery 1000% more gracefully than his predecessor ever could, but why must we continue to suffer phrases like "and then it came - like a miracle - the last of the star whales" and "we never should have come here" that are always accompanied by the sound of our heart strings being hacked at relentlessly by Murray's unrosined bow. The Doctor's self-legendizing is nauseating ("I'd love to forget it all - every last bit of it - but I don't, not ever. 'Cause this is what I do - every time, every day, every second... this.") I understood this kind of stuff was a statement of character in The Eleventh Hour, where he terrifies some aliens with his reputation, but hubris is such a petty emotion that it rankles me and always has. Played unselfconsciously it is also a quality unique to the 21st century Doctors.

There is really no excuse for anyone to ever use the line "it couldn't stand to watch children cry" in regards to the motivation of a gigantic alien space whale. I get that it's a nice space whale and likes children to pet its hooked stabbing tentacles, but it's a space whale. The fact that it eats people at all suggests that it perhaps has a hidden psychopathy. Maybe the Doctor will legendize it to death in a sequel when it finally carries out its Xanatos gambit.

The resolution was a disappointment because the Doctor's intractable dilemma turned out not to be a dilemma at all, and the climax was Amy remembering something. No consequences, no win. Just earlier, the Doctor flips out at Amy by judging her unfairly in a manner we hadn't yet seen from him, but so suddenly that it felt like it was stuck in there like a Scrabble Triple Word modifier except for stakes. It's an anticlimax and even Mandy, the bright little kid from the beginning, looks bored to death as she slumps against a wall just before the climax point, having said all of her lines for the episode. She was our gateway into this future and world but transforms, just as hideously as any doppleganging monster, into an exposition dispenser no less mechanical than one of those creepy, swiveling faces.

And they were creepy. The design of the faces was one of the unreservedly marvellous things about the episode (I loved their clever resemblance to Steven Moffat himself). Even though they were unjustifiable as characters, the mechanical men were a triumph of design, just as were many other aspects of the set dressing: Amy's wind-up light when she's huddled under the tarp, the odd empty classroom, the cabinets where the faces sit... all excellent and unusual. Or rather, excellent because they are unusual. One of my favorite places, where the design and the plot and the theme integrate perfectly, is the Forget/Protest buttons. They work well enough to generate suspense early in the episode with Amy and again with the irritating action-Queen (neat idea though), but they also underline the true horror of the episode, which is "forgetting." The Queen's life is one tragic loop, and Amy's horror at her own decision does more for her character in a single choice than any lingering backstory about not getting married and running away. Volunteering to forget something, literally blocking it from your memory, is something one only does after the highest trauma - it implies (and Doctor Who has always done more with the imagination than with a million computer generated FX) true horror.

I was planning to end on a high note like that one, but feel obliged to remark that the "crack in space" runner is a tedious one. It is such an obvious tease, and bleakly reminiscent of Bad Wolf. Talk about trauma.
 
Hmmm...point of this episode was...

mini01.jpg


MiniCooperRed.jpg


Wasn't actually that impressed with that.
 
I think the point was to basically introduce a new Dalek design ahead of their inevitable return in the end of series finalé (multiple new Dalek props for ten minutes of a single episode? I think not), in multiple colourways to boost toy sales this Christmas.

I'm not really taken with the look, the colours aren't too much of a problem but what's going on with the hunchback?

EDIT: The BBC have posted up a load of Dalek concept art. I like a bit of concept art.
 
*stands up and gives Marble a round of applause, sits down again*

Wasn't that much of a fan of that episode. Not much plot, not enough witty banter to fill it in, rainbow daleks, and the spitfires in space pushed my suspended disbelief until I was forced to mutter "ridiculous" under my breath.

And as with every dalek episode before, the daleks still made me laugh out loud involuntarily several times.

But not at the tea joke, although several people I know seemed to find that hilarious.

Ah well, there's a few duds in every series. The crack thing's growing tedious as well. Too obvious and if it turns out the Doctor's causing them then it's going to remind me too much of the plot of those Philip Pullman books (His Dark Materials series, was that it?)
 
Better than last weeks, not as good as the first.
I agree with the cracks too. They're just too obvious and always at the end of the episode. I'm sure the final episode and the bits that focus on the cracks will become fantastic.

WOULD YOU LIKE SOME TEA

What! I did a half laugh like when the Dalek/Cyberman had that tiff a couple of series ago.
It feels very much like Ecclestone's era. It's uncharted and feels like it's still finding its feet.
 
Bit disappointed with that episode
given all the ingredients it should have been great
the Spitfires in space were just silly...

Don't want to be to dismissive of the new Dalek design
maybe it will grow on me

Interesting note in Confidential that the 2005 Daleks were designed so the eye stork was at the same height as Billie Pipers eye line that's why they were a bit on the small side.
 
Bit disappointed with that episode
given all the ingredients it should have been great
the Spitfires in space were just silly...

Don't want to be to dismissive of the new Dalek design
maybe it will grow on me

Interesting note in Confidential that the 2005 Daleks were designed so the eye stork was at the same height as Billie Pipers eye line that's why they were a bit on the small side.

That's not silly. It's typical old school Doctor Who.
I'm an old Tom Baker fan and some of the stuff they did in the 70's was really campy. It looks like the new regeneration of Doctor Who is trying to be close to that concept.
Look at Amy Pond. The character seems to fall in line with the past companions like Sarah Jane and Romana. Except Romana was a Time Lord also.

Looking forward to this version although I have always compared the current Doctor's with Tom Baker. A very tall order.

Oh and what's sillier than a telephone booth that's bigger inside than it is outside ? :p
 
I have another mammoth review for you guys. Enjoy... maybe?

Here we go:

"Victory of the Daleks" is almost 100% awful.

My first Mark Gatiss was his 1992 Doctor Who novel "Nightshade," which was part of the 7th Doctor New Adventures, an experimental and provocative extension of the so-called Doctor Who "canon." Other stories from the New Adventures, such as Russel Davies's own "Damaged Goods," were looted for material for the 2005 series, including Paul Cornell's "Human Nature," lifted pretty much wholesale from the 1995 paperback. Gatiss was also one of the first writers for the New Series of Doctor Who, with "The Unquiet Dead" maintaining what many considered to be his "traditional" style of storytelling, which focused on atmosphere, especially in period. His later TV story, "The Idiot's Lantern," was true to form. This episode is no exception, except that now, under Moffat, it has no excuse to suck.

The episode is so burdened by melodrama, caricature, and cliche, that it cannot possibly communicate even an inclination of thoughtfulness, and as a plot it withstands only the slightest pressure of rational thought. The characters, which in a story built on the "celebrity historical figure" Winston Churchill should be the richest offerings, are so textureless and flat that they exist only in the imagination as lifeless images: the shouty bomb sergeant, female officers whose presence as an anachronism defeats itself because they exist only to cry about their dead boyfriends, the jaunty airplane pilot who swoops and flips his plane for no reason on the way back to Earth, the patriotic guardsman, the eccentric bespectacled scientist… even Churchill puffs on his cigar constantly, even as his soldiers are exterminated. Apparently we might not recognise him if he didn't.

In an old Doctor Who episode called "The Mind Robber" with the 2nd Doctor, Patrick Troughton, he gains the ability through the use of a machine to make any fiction he speaks of come to life. He has to be careful, as he duels his enemy in a similar machine, not to speak of himself as a part of that fiction, because it would turn him from a real person into an imagined one, a caricature. The Doctor of the 21st century has become this caricature, speaking of himself in the third person ("I am the Doctor!" he crows to his enemies) and otherwise legendizing. He describes the daleks as his "oldest enemy," which is fair enough, until it becomes clear he means "arch enemy," which Amy actually clarifies at the end of the episode. This phenomena enscribes the Doctor and his companion in such simplistic roles that it defeats them as real, living characters, and flattens them, like what literally happens in The Mind Robber, into 2D between the pages of a book.

Making sense of the story is cripplingly difficult. Questions kept me pausing the episode the whole way through: Why are the daleks (called "ironsides") allowed to roam outside of Churchill's office? Would tanks be allowed inside? Perhaps they should have been fitted with something more useful for making tea than a devastating weapon and a clumsy suction cup if making tea was, as we are meant to believe, their secondary purpose. And if Churchill respects the Doctor so much that he has to call him for some reason (through time and space…), why won't he then listen to the Doctor's warnings about the benign daleks? In fact, why is Churchill even so desperate to win the war with these machines when the Doctor feels no qualms informing him, towards the end of the episode, that "you'll be all right"? When Churchill has the daleks shooting down dozens of planes over London, why is he relieved to hear the all-clear sirens? He could destroy any German enemy with retarded ease. Why did the Doctor punch Bracewell in the face for no reason when it was revealed that he was a bomb? Why did the daleks shoot their own android's hand off before teleporting back to their ship (for some reason)? Why are the daleks transmitting their conversation with the doctor on their ship for Bracewell to pick up? Why not threaten the destruction of earth using the bomb inside Bracewell as a bargaining chip BEFORE the infinitely more pathetic threat of TURNING ALL THE LIGHTS ON IN LONDON, which according to the daleks is somehow synonymous with the human race destroying itself. For that matter, if they had the power to create a bomb the size of a person that could blow up an entire planet couldn't they simply apply that power in a less convoluted way?

It seems to be that the daleks' entire plan was to irritate the Doctor into providing "testimony," which he already had done several times before the daleks got excited. This is no less pathetic than the Daleks "absorbing time-traveller DNA" in the 2005 story "Dalek" where they first appear, and makes about as much sense.

Gatiss's "traditional" trappings reverse a lot of the progress that Moffat had seemed to make with the format. In particular, I was annoyed to see the Doctor revert back to trying to protect Amy and leave her behind on Earth. The moment is effectively lampshaded by Amy's sardonic realisation that the Doctor is leaving her behind in the blitz to keep her safe, but it is a wasted few seconds in an episode that suffers for time. This sort of historical story needs time for its characters. The revelation that Bracewell was an android could have been an effective one if we had time to explore it; instead we are treated to a truly stultifying moment where having feelings disables the bomb in his chest. Even worse than this, we are told by direct comparison that feelings of suffering for the death of one's parents in childhood is not as human as "fancying someone you shouldn't."

The story is crippled instantly by a lack of any sort of suspense. It's not a story about whether WWII will be won, or about whether history might be changed, or about Churchill's willingness to do anything he can to protect Britain. It could have been a story about the Doctor putting himself in the place of the daleks. His encouragement of Churchill to "exterminate" the daleks was surely not accidental, nor his outburst at them as his "enemies" where he hits one uselessly with a huge, random, and apparently useless wrench. This was aggressive, obsessed behaviour that actually might have been compelling if he was wrong about the daleks being there as invaders. Or equally, it could have been about xenophobia, like the daleks always were. I'm glad to see that this seems to be once again their reason for existence (and not, as before, some weird cultish worship) but as a story set against the backdrop of nazi invasion, it could have entered into that dimension.

Unfortunately, a story of this length, and with so scatterbrained a series of ambitions, suffocates easily in its 45 minute time slot. The plot must rely far too heavily on the Doctor's and Amy's sudden realisations and subsequent dumps of exposition, the characters wither and die, causality frays, the themes are dissolute, and even Gatiss's famous atmosphere stales into nutritionless gloss. The design is a pattern of perfect stereotypes, and while even I like the new shape of the daleks, their presentation in a row of iPod-style colors warrants the death penalty. Stupidity reaches a truly critical mass when the daleks claim, archly, that "the Earth will die screaming." If you have a bomb powerful enough to destroy an entire planet, and with a name as hyperbolic as an "oblivion continuum" (and non-singular, as if there might be in the bargain bin at Sainsbury's), I doubt much screaming is likely to occur.

Perhaps most galling is the continuing "crack in time" runner. The implication is that it is going to be one giant retcon explaining humanity's inability to remember the several thousand times in the show's history that it has been invaded by aliens or otherwise on the brink of destruction. This series is still doing damage control, like reinstating the daleks as a galactic threat, but in too small doses. Perhaps when Moffat returns next week he will be able to exercise a little damage control of his own after Gatiss's forgettable third-chance television. In my book, he's out.
 

You are a terrific writer and if you don't write reviews or are a journalist for a living than you should! Seriously, that was a terrific review and I completely agree. It could have been so much more; There was a lot of potential in the idea for that episode, and none of it was realised. They had no reason for the Doctor punching that guy in the face, and it seemed like a little 'sound-bite' equivalent that they could put in the ad to demonstrate the new Doctor.
 
Moffat returns next week he will be able to exercise a little damage control of his own after Gatiss's forgettable third-chance television. In my book, he's out.

So you probably won't be to happy to find out that Gatiss will probably be writing a episode next year as well

From an interview i read last week:

How much of the series have you seen?
"Only as much as I have to! I want to watch it as it goes out - it's a shame, but I don't like spoilers! I recently was sent a few of the upcoming episodes because I'm hopefully writing one for next year so I needed to get up to speed with where it's going."
 
So you probably won't be to happy to find out that Gatiss will probably be writing a episode next year as well.

Better him than Toby Whitehouse or Chris Chibnall. Oh wait...

Thanks King Mook Mook. I do write for a living, so that's very kind of you to say. :)
 
I thought that was absolutely superb. They didn't put a single foot wrong, but I tell you who did (to those watching on BBC1)
OVER THE fn RAINBOW.

Thank you for spoiling that rather nice bit of Doctor Who.
 
That was much better, although I spotted the twin heads thing when they first mentioned it so was ready for that bit. It also looks as if the crack thing is going to come to something before the series finale.

This River is younger than the previous one, as she didn't know whether he knew her and he let slip one of her spoilers. It's quite an interesting dynamic having the two of them crossing paths, but always in a different order to the other's perspective.
 
I thought that was absolutely superb. They didn't put a single foot wrong, but I tell you who did (to those watching on BBC1)
OVER THE fn RAINBOW.

Thank you for spoiling that rather nice bit of Doctor Who.

I was out so watched it on iPlayer. Thankfully no interruption for that crap show.
 
I liked last night's episode, but wasn't as scared as I think everyone's meant to be by the Angels. Then again, I was going out afterwards so was only half paying attention.

Also, I didn't realise it was a two parter so was horribly disappointed in the early end :(

Also did the whole Angels talking through Bob thing not remind anyone else of the Vashta Nerada episode? Didn't they talk through some dead person's voice too? I don't like reusing ideas like that - being able to talk to the scary monsters was chilling the first time, this time the repetition grated. You didn't need it.

I'm starting to love Amy though, she gets all the best lines - Oooooo Doctor, you sonic'd her :D

And I'm delighted at the prospect of the cracks plot kicking off next week instead of appearing at the end of every episode of the series.

Edit: Ew, I didn't get that pop up even though that show was on right afterwards. BBC Scotland here.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.