Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Alex Florin

macrumors member
Mar 23, 2016
45
13
Romania
One, they're not "anybody". They're (supposed to be) developers. They did this with an earlier version as well. I think they told people on 10.1 to test a fix on the as yet unreleased 10.2 (my memory on this is a little hazy, so maybe someone else will have a clearer recollection). I think a 10.4 with iPad features makes some sense.

Giving to a "developer" an information like that is like giving it to everyone since it will get public in a matter of minutes, like in this case.

Anyway, i'd love a 10.4 update, hopefully with new iPad features not exclusive to the 2017 model.
 

Djilkosh

macrumors regular
Dec 3, 2016
245
226
Serbia
I think that they are watching developers percentage of using beta. So unless there is ~ 90% of devs using beta and reporting same bugs with zero or one new bug they will push update to beta 2. After that again if there are new bugs from earlier version they try to fix this in beta 2. So we can expect betas till beta 10 or if all critical bugs are fixed they can finish beta testing after beta 3 or beta 4 and push official stable update.
 

Tmelon

macrumors 65816
Feb 26, 2011
1,150
619
Typically I wouldn't be expecting another beta until next week, but releases have been so random lately that I'm not sure anymore.
 

JerTheGeek

macrumors 68000
May 15, 2014
1,993
487
B1 was on Tuesday last week, so maybe they'll stick with that schedule? iOS 10 betas have been so ultimately pretty random, anything is possible.
 

Mlrollin91

macrumors G5
Nov 20, 2008
14,172
10,187
No. They wouldn't have.

That would have made the most logical sense, wouldn't it have? "Oh we are speeding a beta today, might as well seed the others as well."

It is very well possible 3.2 was not ready to be seeded last week, but iOS builds are 2-3 builds ahead internally, so beta 2 is definitely done, potentially beta 3 as well. So it would have been ready to go yesterday.
 

ajay96

macrumors 6502a
Jul 29, 2013
605
255
New York, NY
That would have made the most logical sense, wouldn't it have? "Oh we are speeding a beta today, might as well seed the others as well."

It is very well possible 3.2 was not ready to be seeded last week, but iOS builds are 2-3 builds ahead internally, so beta 2 is definitely done, potentially beta 3 as well. So it would have been ready to go yesterday.

I know that would make sense, but they still most of the time stick to weekly schedules. I know that with 10.2.1, they were all over the place. I think it would come out today.
 

andy.ringwood

Suspended
Nov 20, 2016
337
571
That would have made the most logical sense, wouldn't it have? "Oh we are speeding a beta today, might as well seed the others as well."

It is very well possible 3.2 was not ready to be seeded last week, but iOS builds are 2-3 builds ahead internally, so beta 2 is definitely done, potentially beta 3 as well. So it would have been ready to go yesterday.

Or it might've not been ready for release or they wanted to stagnate them. And yes I know they've release them all at once before.
 

Mlrollin91

macrumors G5
Nov 20, 2008
14,172
10,187
I know that would make sense, but they still most of the time stick to weekly schedules. I know that with 10.2.1, they were all over the place. I think it would come out today.

This weekly beta thing didn't start until iOS 10.1. For the last 9 years of iOS, it was a 2-3 week beta cycle. Because of how complex 10.2 is, I really think it will be 2 weeks.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.