Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

ardchoille50

macrumors 68020
Feb 6, 2014
2,142
1,231
Yes but these limitations are obviously artificial because the Apps seem to work on the iPhone 5, don't they?
You have to remember that some of these apps are content blockers for iOS 9 and some of them, like one of the ad block apps, are standalone web browsers meant for any version of iOS. The content blockers only work on 64-bit systems.
 

ardchoille50

macrumors 68020
Feb 6, 2014
2,142
1,231
With the mini reviews, I am not getting technical with load times, or in general for that matter. I count time myself or use the iPhone 6 stopwatch. I think if I try and get too technical, the general forum member is either going to get lost or stop reading.
Agreed. I feel that the information you've been posting is a very good balance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scjr

Rigby

macrumors 603
Aug 5, 2008
6,257
10,215
San Jose, CA
still wondering why AdMop needs iCloud. Any ideas? I wrote AdMop support but have yet to hear back.
Just a guess, but perhaps it uses iCloud to sync the block list between a user's devices to save them server bandwidth?

Anyway, this blocker is actually interesting. First it let's you see the filter rules, which I like a lot. They also have a different way to enable/disable the block lists: You don't do it in the app, but instead it registers a separate content blocker for each list in the Safari settings. Unfortunately it doesn't support whitelisting.
 

DanEp

macrumors member
Jan 7, 2012
61
2
Strange! Using it and never asked me for any iCloud related stuff!!

Are you logged into iCloud? If you go to settings and attempt to Update Blocking Rules, you will see it grayed out (it least it is on mine) with a note Please log into iCloud to update the rules.

I am not logged into iCloud and am uncomfortable that it needs this. No explanation is provided and I've not seen iCloud access requied on the other few I tried.
 

DotCom2

macrumors 603
Feb 22, 2009
6,323
5,634
With Crystal, is there a way to temporarily disable it if a page does not render correctly?

Is there a way to tell what it is actually doing on any given page? Ex: blocking cookies, tracking scripts, etc.
If there is a page that will not load because of the blocked ads (sad isn't it?) then just hold down the refresh button and it will give you the option to load without the blocker.
 

solly

macrumors member
Jul 13, 2014
54
5
Are you logged into iCloud? If you go to settings and attempt to Update Blocking Rules, you will see it grayed out (it least it is on mine) with a note Please log into iCloud to update the rules.

I am not logged into iCloud and am uncomfortable that it needs this. No explanation is provided and I've not seen iCloud access requied on the other few I tried.

Yeah i am logged into iCloud, and u can find the app in the cloud drive using the cloud ( don't know in what exactly) updating blocking rules is working fine although.


Did you try a reinstall?!
 

lvalenta

macrumors member
Jan 20, 2014
33
27
I'm seriously considering Purify but I'd like to see results of some pages. Is there someone who would give me minute of his life? :)
 

DanEp

macrumors member
Jan 7, 2012
61
2
Yeah i am logged into iCloud, and u can find the app in the cloud drive using the cloud ( don't know in what exactly) updating blocking rules is working fine although.


Did you try a reinstall?!

I loggd into iCloud and saw the app in the cloud drive. When I enabled it, the problem went away. I also see Crystal there.

I really don't understand what function it needs. How would syncing save bandwith? If it copies the rules and updates directly to iCloud instead of to my iPhone this still requires a data transfer from their servers. The app still needs to check if there is an update, either on their servers or that has been synced to the iCloud, right? Confused.
 

Rigby

macrumors 603
Aug 5, 2008
6,257
10,215
San Jose, CA
I really don't understand what function it needs. How would syncing save bandwith? If it copies the rules and updates directly to iCloud instead of to my iPhone this still requires a data transfer from their servers. The app still needs to check if there is an update, either on their servers or that has been synced to the iCloud, right? Confused.
If a user has multiple devices, the app would download the block list from the devs' server for each of them. Alternatively, it could download the block list once on the first device, upload it to iCloud, and every additional device would download the list from there. So if, for example, the users have on average 2 devices, it would cut their server bandwidth in half.

But as I said, it's just a theory. In any case I don't think it's reason for concern, since the app cannot access anything outside its own container on iCloud.

BTW, I'm not seeing anything related to Admop in my iCloud drive for some reason. But I will not pursue it any further since the lack of whitelisting disqualifies the app for me at the moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: solly

BlazingGold

macrumors member
Oct 25, 2014
69
7
So after rave reviews, I've tried the content blocker Crystal. I haven't noticed any increase in page loading speed, plus I now have to reload sometimes, and also it sometimes will not load a video on screen (example : cnn video streams just show and image, not the play button for video). Seems like a waste of a dollar
 
  • Like
Reactions: redman042

RWil85

macrumors 6502a
Aug 2, 2010
587
170
So after rave reviews, I've tried the content blocker Crystal. I haven't noticed any increase in page loading speed, plus I now have to reload sometimes, and also it sometimes will not load a video on screen (example : cnn video streams just show and image, not the play button for video). Seems like a waste of a dollar

A lot of people posting these same issues with most of the blockers. If there's one out there that doesn't do this - please someone chime in.

That being said - they should get better with time as this is new and devs can tweak settings, etc.

But, I hear ya right now - usually more of a pain in the ass than it's worth. Not only are there missing pics/videos, blank pages, - but, it sometimes seems to break the functionality of stuff that the web page actually loads.
 

BlazingGold

macrumors member
Oct 25, 2014
69
7
A lot of people posting these same issues with most of the blockers. If there's one out there that doesn't do this - please someone chime in.

That being said - they should get better with time as this is new and devs can tweak settings, etc.

But, I hear ya right now - usually more of a pain in the ass than it's worth. Not only are there missing pics/videos, blank pages, - but, it sometimes seems to break the functionality of stuff that the web page actually loads.
Exactly. You said it best.... More of a pain rjght now. If safari was prone to viruses and spyware it might be more useful. As of now, if it blocks out the content Im trying to load its almost pointless
 

redman042

macrumors 68040
Jun 13, 2008
3,063
1,657
So after rave reviews, I've tried the content blocker Crystal. I haven't noticed any increase in page loading speed, plus I now have to reload sometimes, and also it sometimes will not load a video on screen (example : cnn video streams just show and image, not the play button for video). Seems like a waste of a dollar
Noticing the same. Perhaps the web developers have already re-coded the ads to bypass the blocker.
 

Solver

macrumors 65816
Jan 6, 2004
1,230
3,205
USA
I find many webpages load about twice as fast using Crystal. If I suspect Crystal is having trouble with the webpage I can always hold down the refresh arrow and disable the ad blocking for that webpage.
 

eclipse01

macrumors 68030
May 16, 2011
2,844
404
Eau Claire, WI
So after rave reviews, I've tried the content blocker Crystal. I haven't noticed any increase in page loading speed, plus I now have to reload sometimes, and also it sometimes will not load a video on screen (example : cnn video streams just show and image, not the play button for video). Seems like a waste of a dollar

Same, although its only 99 cents i'm really let down by the performance of it.

Useless for me at the moment, almost thinking of shutting it off and waiting to see if the developer makes it better.
 

miknos

Suspended
Mar 14, 2008
940
793
Seems like you guys work for advertisers. I've been using known Ad Blockers for ages and they surpass any small hiccup I could encounter.

If you're not using scare tactics, clean your browser history before using an ad blocker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bandofbrothers
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.