Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

SaSaSushi

macrumors 601
Aug 8, 2007
4,156
554
Takamatsu, Japan
If Intel themselves state that ANY form of overclocking on a K CPU results in heat issues, then there is an issue even on non-overclocked CPUs. That means that it is already at a high thermal temperature where ANY overclocking causes severe issues. K series are unlocked and geared towards overclockers. And other users, myself included, do notice a difference with the i7 iMac. It does get loud faster.

Are you saying you're actually using a 7700K or just reading articles?

Here is a quote from a tester running it STOCK.

I have an iMac with an i7 7700K and in over 3 months of heavy daily usage in high ambient temperatures of a western Japan summer I have yet to experience one of these sudden spikes. Send me a link to a news site reporting about temperature spikes and overheating in 2017 iMacs with non-overlocked 7700Ks from a reputable news source.

I don't have any argument with you saying that you find the 7700K to heat up too fast for your taste and that you prefer the i5 for that reason. This is your prerogative. My problem is with claims that the i7 7700K CPUs are defective.

Not to mention that these articles you're linking to are not making your argument about the 7700K heating up faster either. They are reporting about some users reporting sudden, unexplained temperature spikes.
 
Last edited:

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,144
7,120
Are you saying you're actually using a 7700K or just reading articles?



I have an iMac with an i7 7700K and in over 3 months of heavy daily usage in high ambient temperatures of a western Japan summer I have yet to experience one of these sudden spikes. Send me a link to a news site reporting about temperature spikes and overheating in 2017 iMacs with non-overlocked 7700Ks from a reputable news source.

I don't have any argument with you saying that you find the 7700K to heat up too fast for your taste and that you prefer the i5 for that reason. This is your prerogative. My problem is with claims that the i7 7700K CPUs are defective.

Not to mention that these articles you're linking to are not making your argument about the 7700K heating up faster either. They are reporting about some users reporting sudden, unexplained temperature spikes.

I used one. Returned it for the i5 model. It could have been due to indexing or the fact that it was brand new and needed a future update, or I could have had a bad one. Not sure. But I returned it and got the i5. Sudden unexplained temperature spikes up to 93 Celsius results in more fan speed to keep it cool.

Intel themselves said these unexplained sudden spikes are normal. What needs to cool a processor at 90 Celsius? High fan RPMs. Which is why some of here DO notice that this year's i7 gets hot FASTER due to these spikes. This processor has bad thermal issues. People have delidded these and reapplied proper thermal compound and got ~25 Celsius cooler. Even running on stock.

Take a look here. https://communities.intel.com/message/471425#471425

Just do a simple search. I7 7700k heat issues.
 
Last edited:

Timotime

macrumors newbie
Sep 5, 2017
4
1
If "proper thermal compound" would be the solution - don´t you think apple would also know this? What are they thinking: "Hmm, well ... if we spend 4$ for ad good thermal compound the machine would be run a lot cooler... but... 4$... no... we can´t afford this". I mean... maybe this works... but WHY THE HELL should apple not fix this form the beginning?
 

SaSaSushi

macrumors 601
Aug 8, 2007
4,156
554
Takamatsu, Japan
I used one. Returned it for the i5 model. It could have been due to indexing or the fact that it was brand new and needed a future update, or I could have had a bad one. Not sure. But I returned it and got the i5. Sudden unexplained temperature spikes up to 93 Celsius results in more fan speed to keep it cool.

Well, again, I'm glad you got the model that is the best for you and I have not experienced any of these reported problems with my i7. If I did I would certainly contact Apple to file a claim under AppleCare.

Intel themselves said these unexplained sudden spikes are normal. What needs to cool a processor at 90 Celsius? High fan RPMs. Which is why some of here DO notice that this year's i7 gets hot FASTER due to these spikes.

Other users here, myself included, are saying that their i7 does not get hotter faster. It's possible that some percentage of 7700Ks in the iMacs are suffering from these heat spikes and those users should have Apple address it.

This processor has bad thermal issues. People have delidded these and reapplied proper thermal compound and got ~25 Celsius cooler. Even running on stock.
Take a look here. https://communities.intel.com/message/471425#471425

Those aren't Macs and maybe it's a credit to Apple's own thermal compounding.

I am not saying these reports you're linking to are false. I'm just saying it's not fair to use them as some sort of evidence that all i7 iMacs heat up too fast.

They do not.
If "proper thermal compound" would be the solution - don´t you think apple would also know this? What are they thinking: "Hmm, well ... if we spend 4$ for ad good thermal compound the machine would be run a lot cooler... but... 4$... no... we can´t afford this". I mean... maybe this works... but WHY THE HELL should apple not fix this form the beginning?

Fix what?
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAntigoon

robeddie

Suspended
Jul 21, 2003
1,777
1,731
Atlanta
FWIW, my i5 in my 2017 iMac, when pushed to the limit with encoding in Premiere CC - 97% processor usage, the temps top out at 81-82c with the fans still very quiet at 1200rpm.

On average low level usage, it sits at around 53c, fans still in the 1200rpm range.
 
Last edited:

joema2

macrumors 68000
Sep 3, 2013
1,646
866
...not saying it is louder than previous models....We are saying it gets loud FASTER....

Where is the evidence the 2017 i7 iMac gets loud *faster* than previous i7 iMacs back to 2012? Have you tested any two of them side by side? This is a Mac forum, and the thread is about whether the 2017 i7 iMac 27 gets noisier than previous i7 iMacs or maybe gets noisier faster -- it not about some alleged problem with overclocked i7s in a Windows machine.

I've run many tests side by side with my 2015 and 2017 i7 iMacs and don't see or hear the 2017 i7 iMac as getter hotter, noisier or noisier faster, than the 2015. The same is true for my 2013 i7 iMac 27.

Max Yuryev also tested the 2015 and 2017 i7 iMacs and found likewise. He found with the CPU under full load, the 2017 i7 iMac ran cooler (see 03:00-03:45):

Max stated they *both* get hot and loud under high CPU load but in instrumented tests the 2017 iMac did better.

Besides CPU, he found the 2017 iMac ran *much* cooler and quieter than the 2015 iMac under high GPU stress. See the above video at 04:40. Unless people will be running exclusively non-GPU apps, this also is a significant factor.
 

Huginnmuninn

macrumors regular
Oct 8, 2011
200
30
So you quoted me then said " If you don't want a 7700K, don't get one but let's stop with the misinformation about defects" but you weren't really talking about anything I said being misinformation, you were just... what, ranting?

/plonk/
 
Last edited:

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,144
7,120
Where is the evidence the 2017 i7 iMac gets loud *faster* than previous i7 iMacs back to 2012? Have you tested any two of them side by side? This is a Mac forum, and the thread is about whether the 2017 i7 iMac 27 gets noisier than previous i7 iMacs or maybe gets noisier faster -- it not about some alleged problem with overclocked i7s in a Windows machine.

I've run many tests side by side with my 2015 and 2017 i7 iMacs and don't see or hear the 2017 i7 iMac as getter hotter, noisier or noisier faster, than the 2015. The same is true for my 2013 i7 iMac 27.

Max Yuryev also tested the 2015 and 2017 i7 iMacs and found likewise. He found with the CPU under full load, the 2017 i7 iMac ran cooler (see 03:00-03:45):

Max stated they *both* get hot and loud under high CPU load but in instrumented tests the 2017 iMac did better.

Besides CPU, he found the 2017 iMac ran *much* cooler and quieter than the 2015 iMac under high GPU stress. See the above video at 04:40. Unless people will be running exclusively non-GPU apps, this also is a significant factor.

Yes. Go back and see my posts. I did have an i7 but I returned it for the i5 instead. I no longer have it to record a video or audio sample, but it was indeed louder FASTER than a previous model was.

Who the hell cares if this is a Mac forum? The processor model is the EXACT SAME. 7700K. I was showing reports that these are getting way too hot, even under stock for people. There is no Apple 7700K and Intel 7700K. So if the 7700K is experiencing issues, even to those running it under stock performance, that it WILL AFFECT MACS. Because there is no Apple Special Edition 7700K processor. And all the reports prove there is an issue. If there weren't that many reports, I would have just assumed I had a bad model.

Yes, they both get HOT AND LOUD under high CPU load, but the 2017 one gets loud FASTER. Look at my previous post. Running a very long export from FCPX for about 45 minutes had the noise level match on both models. But the 2017 model got loud FASTER. Some people, as the OP, are stating that the 2017 is LOUDER. I am NOT stating this. Just that it gets loud FASTER. Which is why these articles that the TIM is very very poor on the 7700K and people are reporting heating issues.

Yes, GPU bound tasks did run cooler, but not CPU tasks.

http://wccftech.com/intel-core-i7-7700k-delid-performance-tests/
https://www.kitguru.net/components/...acement-improves-5ghz-oc-temps-by-30-degrees/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Huginnmuninn

mikeboss

macrumors 68000
Aug 13, 2009
1,546
867
switzerland
I have to agree, the 2017 iMac with the i7 CPU ramps up the fan much quicker than the 2015 model equipped with i7 does. I do own a late 2015 iMac 27" with the 4.0 GHz CPU and I had a customer's 2017 model (equipped with the 4.2 GHz i7) on my workbench. if my 2015 model would start to ramp up the fan as quick as the 2017 model does, I would have returned it immediately...
 
Last edited:

joema2

macrumors 68000
Sep 3, 2013
1,646
866
...not saying it is louder than previous models....We are saying it gets loud FASTER...

....Where is the evidence the 2017 i7 iMac gets loud *faster* than previous i7 iMacs back to 2012?

Yes. Go back and see my posts. I did have an i7 but I returned it for the i5 instead. I no longer have it to record a video or audio sample, but it was indeed louder FASTER than a previous model was...

You had a previous-model-year i7 iMac which you compared side-by-side to the 2017 i7 iMac? Or you are comparing the 2017 i7 iMac to the 2017 i5 iMac?

The entire point is whether the 2017 i7 iMac is louder, hotter or gets louder faster than previous-model-year i7 iMacs of recent vintage, say back to 2012. Comparing it to an i5 iMac is not the debate, nor is comparing it to a 2009 i7 iMac nor an i7 Mac Mini or any other old machine. Of course the 2017 i5 iMac runs quieter under high CPU load than a 2013, 2014, 2015 or 2017 i7 iMac. Nobody is questioning that.

Mikeboss just posted he compared the 2017 i7 iMac to the 2015 i7 iMac and felt the 2017's fan ramped up quicker under similar loads. That is not my experience or Max Yuryev's but it's a valid comparison. At least Mike had both machines and tested them both. It is unclear to me whether you or most of the posters on this thread did that.
 

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,144
7,120
You had a previous-model-year i7 iMac which you compared side-by-side to the 2017 i7 iMac? Or you are comparing the 2017 i7 iMac to the 2017 i5 iMac?

The entire point is whether the 2017 i7 iMac is louder, hotter or gets louder faster than previous-model-year i7 iMacs of recent vintage, say back to 2012. Comparing it to an i5 iMac is not the debate, nor is comparing it to a 2009 i7 iMac nor an i7 Mac Mini or any other old machine. Of course the 2017 i5 iMac runs quieter under high CPU load than a 2013, 2014, 2015 or 2017 i7 iMac. Nobody is questioning that.

Mikeboss just posted he compared the 2017 i7 iMac to the 2015 i7 iMac and felt the 2017's fan ramped up quicker under similar loads. That is not my experience or Max Yuryev's but it's a valid comparison. At least Mike had both machines and tested them both. It is unclear to me whether you or most of the posters on this thread did that.

2015 i7 iMac was the other system.
I compared the 2015 i7 iMac with the 2017 i7 iMac. Didn't like it so I returned the 2017 i7 and got the 2017 i5 iMac instead.

Of course I do not compare an i5 and i7 and say complain when it gets loud fast. I expect that from the i7.
 

SaSaSushi

macrumors 601
Aug 8, 2007
4,156
554
Takamatsu, Japan
So you quoted me then said " If you don't want a 7700K, don't get one but let's stop with the misinformation about defects" but you weren't really talking about anything I said being misinformation, you were just... what, ranting?

/plonk/

You lost me here. Don't get too hung up with the quoting. Let me make this simple: (This has nothing to do with your comments)

1) There is no evidence to suggest that the 2017 i7 7700K iMac gets hot any faster than previous generation iMacs.
2) The i7 7700K in the 2017 iMac is not defective.
[doublepost=1505169681][/doublepost]
Mikeboss just posted he compared the 2017 i7 iMac to the 2015 i7 iMac and felt the 2017's fan ramped up quicker under similar loads. That is not my experience or Max Yuryev's but it's a valid comparison. At least Mike had both machines and tested them both. It is unclear to me whether you or most of the posters on this thread did that.

It's pretty clear to me that they did not when their main argument is that some users in the Intel community are reporting sudden 7700K temperature spikes, primarily in overclocking as solid evidence that those in the iMac heat up too fast and are defective.
 
Last edited:

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,144
7,120
You lost me here. Don't get too hung up with the quoting. Let me make this simple: (This has nothing to do with your comments)

1) There is no evidence to suggest that the 2017 i7 7700K iMac gets hot any faster than previous generation iMacs.
2) The i7 7700K in the 2017 iMac is not defective.
[doublepost=1505169681][/doublepost]

It's pretty clear to me that they did not when their main argument is that some users in the Intel community are reporting sudden 7700K temperature spikes, primarily in overclocking as solid evidence that those in the iMac heat up too fast and are defective.

Why are you so hung up on the overclocking part? There are some that are reporting high temperature spikes running stock too. And when delidding the processor, even when overclocked, brings it from 90s to 60s. People have these things super cooled, usually through water cooling. It is pretty common to overclock and still have these K processors operate in the 60s or 70s under load. But this one specifically is much hotter and it does reach the 100 threshold when overclocked very easily. People are not overclocking these things to 6 Ghz and complaining.

Why don't you get it? If there were NO reported issues with the 7700K, I would have just assumed I had a bad iMac. It happens. But these things are proven to be difficult to keep cool due to the voltage and temperature spikes. If X has issues with spiking and getting hot fast, overclocking X causes severe issues (blue screen, force shut down due to overheating, and more). That is what people are complaining about. It is not just overclocking X is causing the issues. There are people reporting issues with the 7700K running stock too. So when you overclock an already problematic CPU, things get worse.

I don't understand the issue here. Overclocking enhances the problem. That does not mean there is NO issue when running stock (as people have reported that too). These iMacs are not shutting down within minutes due to going over 100 Celsius, which DOES happen to overclockers. THAT is an issue with overclocking, but there is still an issue with these running stock too.

As I have said, if there were no reports of 7700K problems when I performed my test, I would have assumed I had a bad iMac. It does happen.

Intel DOES state that not even overclocked, just opening a website, or a program, or a background process, you can expect to see a +25/35 Celsius spike. They recommend NOT to overclock a K processor due to this, and they say it is normal. Now, if you are using FCPX and running at 60 Celsius, if it spikes to 90 Celsius, guess what? The fans need to kick on.

The evidence is there. A K processor is advertised to overclockers. When Intel states that it is normal for these spikes under stock speeds and to NOT overclock them, there is a problem. My test showed that these things got the same level of noise as the 2015 i7 iMac, but it got there much faster. As proof by Intel themselves that large spikes are common. Usually within half a second you can see these temperatures go from 50-60 to 70-90. So the fans need to kick on sooner. Which I saw from testing the 2015 i7 iMac and 2017 i7 iMac.

Again, I am not saying it is louder. Just that the fans kick in sooner.

And who knows, I could very well have had a bad iMac that made it worse during my test. But all these 7700K issues make me think otherwise.

And actually, overclocked or not, if people have issues even water cooling these, the thin iMac design does more harm than a water-cooled design. People running stock and getting very expensive and better heatsinks and fans are still having issues.
 
Last edited:

SaSaSushi

macrumors 601
Aug 8, 2007
4,156
554
Takamatsu, Japan
Why are you so hung up on the overclocking part?

I'm not. I said primarily occurs in overlocking but be that as it may,

Some users reporting sudden, unexplained heat spikes ≠ 2017 i7 iMacs heat up faster then prior generations.

One of the people you're arguing with has both the 7700K iMac and a 2015 iMac on the same desk next to each other doing video encoding and is telling you the fans aren't ramping up quicker in the 2017.
[doublepost=1505183140][/doublepost]
And who knows, I could very well have had a bad iMac that made it worse during my test.

Now there's a possibility.
 
Last edited:

Laai

macrumors regular
Apr 23, 2012
143
33
Germany
My experience was different. I had late 2015 i5 iMac with M395X. Idle they are the same obviously. Under load (I play CSGO and temps ramp um then) the newer model is much quieter and performs better, by a large margin, than the old one (I got the mid tier i5 with Radeon Pro 575).
 

EugW

macrumors G5
Jun 18, 2017
14,995
12,958
My experience was different. I had late 2015 i5 iMac with M395X. Idle they are the same obviously. Under load (I play CSGO and temps ramp um then) the newer model is much quieter and performs better, by a large margin, than the old one (I got the mid tier i5 with Radeon Pro 575).
Nobody is complaining about the 2017 i5 models. Only the i7.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Laai

Prizm4

macrumors newbie
Sep 8, 2017
20
1
Regarding the i7 overheating issue, it might be possible for Apple to do a fix or workaround with a firmware/BIOS update.
 

joema2

macrumors 68000
Sep 3, 2013
1,646
866
Regarding the i7 overheating issue, it might be possible for Apple to do a fix or workaround with a firmware/BIOS update.

First, it is unclear there is an i7 overheating issue unique to the 2017 iMac. I have both 2017 and 2015 i7 iMacs on my desk side by side. Under high CPU stress both rapidly ramp up the fan and both are fairly loud. That is also how my 2013 i7 iMac 27 and my 2012 i7 iMac 27 behave. I really don't see a dramatic overall difference in the 2017 vs 2015 i7 models when doing controlled, side-by-side tests -- except the 2017 model is much faster under some workloads.

Maybe there are certain specific tests where the 2017 model gets hotter faster, but unless you run those side-by-side with a 2015 i7 under identical controlled conditions it would be hard to tell.

When transcoding 4k H264 to ProRes proxy in FCPX -- a very common operation -- the 2017 i7 iMac is about 2x faster than the 2015 i7 model.

I have run my 2013, 2015 and 2017 i7 iMacs at 100% CPU for many days at a time transcoding video. They are all definitely loud in that state, yet the 2013 model is still running fine after four years of regular long-duration high-CPU stress for professional video editing.

If noise was more important than performance I might have an 2017 3.8Ghz i5, which is still pretty fast but quieter. The i7 hyperthreading can help in some workloads, but it's difficult to tell what those are and it's highly variable.

In past tests I used the 3rd-party CPUSetter utility to disable hyperthreading on my previous i7 iMacs and it cut FCPX transcoding performance by 30%. I just tried that again on both 2015 and 2017 i7 iMacs using the latest FCPX 10.3.4 on Sierra, and it made no difference. I don't know why the change -- maybe the latest code path is limited by Quick Sync processing time not CPU.

I just did a similar test using Handbrake transcoding from 4k H264 to 1080p x264, and on both 2015 and 2017 i7 iMac, hyperthreading makes an approximate 17-18% improvement. If comparing the 3.8Ghz i5 to 4.2Ghz i7, you'd expect a approx. 28% total improvement: 17% from HT and 11% from CPU clock rate. Whether that's worth the greater noise level is an individual decision.

I couldn't really tell a difference in heat or noise whether HT was on or off, but I could see only four logical cores were used when HT was disabled. This shows how you can read "HT makes the CPU run hot", but your actual workload may not reflect that.
 

SaSaSushi

macrumors 601
Aug 8, 2007
4,156
554
Takamatsu, Japan
I think this noise debate would benefit of actual measurement of sound level in dB.

Well that would benefit one part of it anyway. I'd also be interested in a scientific measurement to address those claiming that the 2017 iMac's fan is louder than previous generations.

I detected zero difference in max fan noise between my 2017 iMac and Late 2013 iMac.

There is no argument, however, that at high RPMs the iMac's fans are loud. I'm glad I almost never hear them.
 

solarflab

macrumors member
Aug 18, 2017
30
26
I think this noise debate would benefit of actual measurement of sound level in dB.

I've always wanted this. What people consider as loud is such a subjective matter that most of the opinions in this thread are pointless. The only opinion in my mind that has merit is if the temps actually rise faster or not, which means faster to get loud. It's easier to objectively describe time than sound, also most people have a rather similar feel for time.
 

SaSaSushi

macrumors 601
Aug 8, 2007
4,156
554
Takamatsu, Japan
What people consider as loud is such a subjective matter that most of the opinions in this thread are pointless.

I happen to believe that all opinions, objective, subjective or otherwise are valuable, even from those I personally disagree with. The purpose of these forums is to share them.

It's easier to objectively describe time than sound, also most people have a rather similar feel for time.

I don't know that this is necessarily true either. A lot of us are objectively comparing the noise the fans in our 2017 iMacs make to those of fans in other iMacs we've owned, some side by side on the same desk.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.