I don’t think that’s necessarily an issue if that thing is used for making money.
I don't have a problems with that too but hard to find attractive PC design like Apple.
I don’t think that’s necessarily an issue if that thing is used for making money.
Depends if you like minimal design, Apple do make fantastic looking products
Maybe, but I doubt a PC would still be going strong after 10 years, and have been trouble free.You can get a lot more bang for buck for PC than a Mac Pro.
Fixed that for you; it's "silicon", not "silicone"; and Apple themselves have it in lowercase in all their press releases & marketing materials...You can get a lot more bang for buck for PC than a Mac Pro. The latest consumer of both chips coming out by the end of the year would wipe the floor in most tasks vs the Mac Pro, if you need to run Apple Pro Apps that is a different story but for say Adobe, most video editing programs, most audio programs and pretty much all 3D programs your better off buying a PC, but now with the new Apple silicon chips announced things will get very interesting!
Only if you want a slow running, high wattage, with a ridiculous cooling system computer. The M1 was curb stomping any PC of similar design in terms of performance/watt/price and these new M1 are doing more of the same. Never mind Macs have an insanely long lifespan compared to a PC, something that was true even back in the 68k and Power PC days - a minimum of 3-4 years longer lifespan than a comparative PC.You can get a lot more bang for buck for PC than a Mac Pro.
My Gateway FX6831-03 16GB 4 Core Tower from 2010 that I brought for comparative peanuts ($1,600) would like you to hold its beer.Maybe, but I doubt a PC would still be going strong after 10 years, and have been trouble free.
oops, the 3 was a typo on my part….i did say 2 ports but yeah you’re right they could choose just to have 2 more channels as they’re in control of everything
That's the problem, you see. You can't get an AMD or an i9 for serious editing. You want a Xeon. I know several AMD chips support ECC and all, but for professional work, AMD is still not widely accepted. So you end up with specialised processors and motherboards that end up costing a lot. We also need sufficient PCIe slots to fit a large GPU and an SDI card (broadcast video in/out), and a 10GbE port or card. The 64GB, 1TB SSD, 16-24 core PCs we get are €7-10K. The Mac Pro isn't too far off.Anyway, yeah, more bang for your buck with a PC... For example, my current rig:
ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Impact mDTX motherboard
AMD Ryzen 3900X 12-core CPU
Yeah, the big fail with the Mac Pro is as a solution for those of us who actually wanted a reasonably powerful desktop tower, a "pro-sumer" level discrete GPU (with the possibility of upgrading mid-life) and upgradeable internal storage. For that, i9/AMD - or even a lesser Xeon system without the extreme PCIe & RAM expansion capability of the Mac Pro - is the tool for the job.That's the problem, you see. You can't get an AMD or an i9 for serious editing. You want a Xeon. I know several AMD chips support ECC and all, but for professional work, AMD is still not widely accepted.
I wanted a 2019 Mac Pro, but not for six grand, especially since I could get so much more for half the price building up a Windows PC...Yeah, the big fail with the Mac Pro is as a solution for those of us who actually wanted a reasonably powerful desktop tower, a "pro-sumer" level discrete GPU (with the possibility of upgrading mid-life) and upgradeable internal storage. For that, i9/AMD - or even a lesser Xeon system without the extreme PCIe & RAM expansion capability of the Mac Pro - is the tool for the job.
If you need a 20+ core Xeon, 512GB+ of RAM and multiple workstation-class GPUs - and the PCIe bandwidth to match - then the Mac Pro doesn't look quite so bad (...last I looked, Apple's Xeon CPU upgrades were "only" the same as Intel's list "target" prices, and while their RAM and storage prices were ridiculous, you could use standard RAM and PCIe SSDs).
Whatever you think of the Mac Pro in general it's hard to see the $6k entry level system as anything but a joke - unless you're going to plug in $10k worth of expansion including an unapproved CPU replacement.
As for the Apple silicon future... Given PCIe slots at sub-Mac Pro prices probably ain't gonna happen, A M1 Pro Mini would do me (the regular M1 is just a bit too restricted on RAM and display support) but I can't see it cutting the mustard for customers currently using a Mac Pro or even a fully-tricked-out 2020 5k iMac - because the only thing truly exceptional about the GPU performance of the M1 Pro/Max is what it can do within the constrained power/thermal envelope of a laptop - and while unified memory may offer some space saving over separate RAM and VRAM I suspect that will be pretty marginal and app-dependent and certainly ain't gonna cater for people who actually need 256GB+
So the question is, do Apple do enough Mac Pro business to design an Apple Silicon Xeon-W killer chip (and, if so, how is it going to cater for the more extreme RAM requirements, and how big can they scale their GPU?) or will they go with some novel system with multiple M1/Pro/Max chips where the GPU and RAM is somehow distributed (XGrid in a box?)
IMO, it's time for a new form factor though. I also wonder if there are some chip supply constraints.Really bummed they didn't put these new M1P/M1M guts into a Mini case and call it a day.
I think they will. Rumor was it was going to happen this month but they delayed that (I'm not surprised in the current world environment).Really bummed they didn't put these new M1P/M1M guts into a Mini case and call it a day.
I think they will. Rumor was it was going to happen this month but they delayed that (I'm not surprised in the current world environment).
My guess is that it will be announced within four months or so.
Really bummed they didn't put these new M1P/M1M guts into a Mini case and call it a day.
IMO, it's time for a new form factor though. I also wonder if there are some chip supply constraints.
I think they will. Rumor was it was going to happen this month but they delayed that (I'm not surprised in the current world environment).
My guess is that it will be announced within four months or so.
My (new design) Mac mini wish list:I really hope so.
Aside from my dream of a larger screened "MacBook Air Max", a higher than M1 specced Mac mini is the machine I really want.
My (new design) Mac mini wish list:My (new design) Mac mini wish list:
Mac mini
$2999
- M1 Max SoC
- 10-core CPU (8P/2E)
- 32-core GPU
- 16-core Neural Engine
- 64GB RAM
- 1TB SSD
- 10Gb Ethernet port
- (4) USB-C ports
- (2) USB-A ports
- HDMI port
- 3.5mm audio port
Is 2008 more than 10 years ago?Maybe, but I doubt a PC would still be going strong after 10 years, and have been trouble free.
Considering the 16"mbp 10 core, 32 core gpu, 64gb ram is £3700, don't be surprised if the macpro is a similar price to the intel version, circa £5500.As for the rumored plans for the Mac Pro lineup, so far everything we are hearing (reading) is that Apple will use multiple SoCs in a system...
Jade 2C
- 20-core CPU (16P/4E)
- 64-core GPU
- 32-core Neural Engine
- 128GB RAM
Yes, but that is the same as my G4 PowerBook, still runs perfectly, but it's not fit for running modern software.Is 2008 more than 10 years ago?
Dell Inspiron 530 with Win7 32-bit.
Define trouble free.
Issues with the OS and apps are to be expected.
The Brother printer purchased at the same time still works.
$399 for the PC. My Bro upgraded the RAM.
I'm all thumbs.
Your price estimation seems pretty good IMHO, considering no laptop display.....👍My (new design) Mac mini wish list:
Mac mini
$2999
- M1 Max SoC
- 10-core CPU (8P/2E)
- 32-core GPU
- 16-core Neural Engine
- 64GB RAM
- 1TB SSD
- 10Gb Ethernet port
- (4) USB-C ports
- (2) USB-A ports
- HDMI port
- 3.5mm audio port