The iPad line may be complicated now but Mac minis aren’t iPads so that is pretty much irrelevant to this discussion.
It may be irrelevant to the personal wishes people write down in this thread, but in the context of the bigger picture (i.e. the well-being and long-term sustainability of Apple as a Company) it is very relevant in my opinion.
The iPad line-up should be a warning example for all those wishes uttered here.
Some want a basic M2 mini for low cost, others an M2 Max for performance, yet others would prefer an M2 Pro as compromise between the former two.
Some would like to retain the current form factor, others would prefer a smaller form factor.
Some are fine with less ports, others want even more than on the Studio.
If Apple would cater to all those wishes, we soon would have a mess in the Mac (mini) lineup that’s even worse than in the iPad lineup.
Therefore I do plead to drastically reduce options: Keep the mini with the basic M1/2 chip and perhaps shrink the housing to that of the AppleTV (cost reasons - ideally allowing for a better entry price again).
The Intel mini is only there for people still needing the compatibility. Performance wise even the M1 is already adequate. Thus the Intel mini can eventually be removed without successor.
Prosumers and other customers wanting more power can be upsold to the Studio with its Max entry flavor. Sure, it’s more expensive, but Apple never was famous for basement bargain offers.
The M2 Pro can be the entry option of the MBP series, where it allows for diversification from the MB line of notebooks. It’s not needed in the mini.
If people insist on a device with an M2 Pro that costs less than a Mac Studio, they can get a MBP and use it in clamshell mode.
Sure people would moan and complain that they’d want the M2 Pro in the mini (especially the fraction of the target audience gathered in this forum), but no matter what, there’ll always be complaints.
So there’s my opinion and now you can flame me 🔥😎