Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Jollins

macrumors regular
Jun 9, 2006
195
0
Regardless of where they are built, I find my intel machine to be faster than my G4. Of course, this is obvious, but the G4 is far more stable. I've been having so many issues with my iMac Core Duo, my wireless woes cheif among them. I've never had any, any problems whatsoever with my G4 ibook, and it kind of makes me wish that Apple didn't switch architectures. I guess only time will tell if the intel machines will be just as reliable, as my iMac is a revision A. I should've waited. It's kind of disappointing, because my G4 ibook was my first mac, and its rock solid stability has given me the false impression that macs are invincible to problems. My intel iMac has debunked this.

As for the physical build quality, I don't see any difference.
Things like wireless bugs sounds like software issues. I'd expect things like this to be ironed out with Leopard, since Tiger was created initially primarily for PPC.
 

bearbo

macrumors 68000
Jul 20, 2006
1,858
0
Its not a chinese fault. The fact that they now produce in China is part of the reason. Apple is now more interested in quantity than quality. Its not China that forced Apple to produce their products in it, its all Apple's decision.

you do imply quite explicitly that chinese = bad quality, i'm just telling you that is most certainly not true.

the problematic intel macs are due to design errors rather than manufacture errors... mostly.
 

eXan

macrumors 601
Jan 10, 2005
4,738
134
Russia
you do imply quite explicitly that chinese = bad quality, i'm just telling you that is most certainly not true.

the problematic intel macs are due to design errors rather than manufacture errors... mostly.

What about incorrectly applied thermal pastes?
 

GimmeSlack12

macrumors 603
Apr 29, 2005
5,406
13
San Francisco
It is worth noting that if you are basing your opinion on the QA of Intel Macs only on what MacRumors people post then you are looking at the negative side of the spectrum.

People come to MR to complain about big or small or minute issues with their computers. So you have to take it on faith that Apple is doing just fine and that the Intels will hold up just fine.

Look at PC's with Intel chips, they've lasted just fine haven't they? A Mac nowadays is no different except it runs a different primary OS.

Relax Everyone. It's gonna be OK!
 

thewhitehart

macrumors 65816
Jul 9, 2005
1,103
607
The town without George Bailey
Things like wireless bugs sounds like software issues. I'd expect things like this to be ironed out with Leopard, since Tiger was created initially primarily for PPC.


Yeah, I definitely agree it's a software issue with intel and Tiger. I hope 10.4.9 fixes it, and I'm sure Leopard will. As for the build quality of my imac, it's fine, if nobody told me it was made in China I'd have no idea. It's certainly ignorant to equate "Chinese" with "shoddy" from a racial standpoint, and I'm sure few people on this forum are that ignorant. You get what your chosen company pays its employees for more so than you get what you pay for, and I'm sure if they were making more than $2 a day for most products shipped from China, the build quality of Chinese imports would be better.
 

YS2003

macrumors 68020
Dec 24, 2004
2,138
0
Finally I have arrived.....
I think it is too early to speculate on reliability of intel Mac because it has been just about a year from the launch.

The manufacturing location is not relevant in this age. Production quality made in China has increased significantly over the course of years and there is no stigma of "cheap Chinese low quality" stereo-type now. Mass-production is fairly automated and very mundane process without too much of human input during the production (even though there is the quality checks along the production line to make sure products are assembled according to specs).

Blaming the country of the production for the product quality is so out-dated now in this global economy in which many companies are doing productions outside of their home country.
 

Dunepilot

macrumors 6502a
Feb 25, 2002
880
0
UK
I think people are forgetting that there's more to the hardware change-over than purely getting a different processor. Apple's new relationship with Intel means that whether a product is any good or not actually has a lot to do with the Intel subsystems.

Example - wireless reception in my Mac Mini Intel is hopeless.

I think they're using Intel wireless for this, if I'm not mistaken. Older G3/G4 machines I've owned that used Lucent technology were consistently very good wirelessly.
 

nsbio

macrumors 6502a
Aug 8, 2006
634
0
NC
Let me refer you to some real information regarding quality:
http://www.macintouch.com/reliability/laptops.html - 41% of the rev A 15" Al PBs needed repair in their first year.
http://www.macintouch.com/reliability/macbooks.html - not directly comparable since they haven't been out for a year.


The RevA 15'' Al PBs needed repairs mostly for the display problems (white blotches) and hinges, meaning that the problems were concentrated in a couple of areas. The MBPs' issues are all over the place, according to the survey, meaning that you do not know where the next problem will come from. Hopefully, future revisions will eliminate and reduce the severity of most issues, because as of now, I feel that it is not worth to ditch my PB for an intel machine.
 

bearbo

macrumors 68000
Jul 20, 2006
1,858
0
What about incorrectly applied thermal pastes?

i read somewhere that the instruction given to operators to apply thermal paste was incorrect, they had to give out another set of instruction
 

ziwi

macrumors 65816
Jan 6, 2004
1,087
0
Right back where I started...
The apparent increase in issues can actually be a sign of a good thing.

If people only complain and rarely compliment the amount of complaints may be indicative of a larger market. And with a larger market comes issues if the the factory has to deliver more than planned and that too can contribute to issues. The increase in problems that we are seeing may just be part of a growing market and by percent be similar to what Apple has always experienced.

Just a thought.
 

aristobrat

macrumors G5
Oct 14, 2005
12,292
1,403
I believe first versions of Intel-based Macs may not be as reliable as their PowerPC predecessors because Apple is new to the x86 architecture and needs to learn how to perfect their designs in a similar fashion to their PowerPC machines. Look at history, the Macintosh PowerBook 5300, an absolute disaster and the first PowerPC Mac laptop. By the time they hit the Bronze Keyboard PowerBook G3s they were quite rock-solid.
a few teething problems should be expected.
Exactly.

IMO, some forum members seem to be only familiar with the later generation (and virtually perfect) iBooks and PowerBooks and unaware (or purposefully ignorant) of the fact that Apple appears to have had similar "teething issues" with prior PPC releases.

The MBPs' issues are all over the place, according to the survey, meaning that you do not know where the next problem will come from.
IIRC, weren't the major initial MBP issues (Buzzing, Whining, Mooing and Hissing) all logicboard related and either fixed by a later, updated logicboard reversion or an SMC update that changed some settings on the logicboard?

I could be wrong, but look at all those recent issues with intel-Macs, err, MacBooks! Whine, moo, yeallowing, extensive heat, etc. Is this simply because of this is a rev. A products?
As pointed out earlier, Apple's had zero prior experience designing Intel-based machines, and IIRC, all of those issues were addressed on later batches of Rev. A products, so I guess that answers your question itself, no? :)

Apple is now more interested in quantity than quality. Its not China that forced Apple to produce their products in it, its all Apple's decision.
You say this like Apple has a choice. :eek: :D Hasn't Apple doubled its notebook market share this year? Do you remember how long it took for them to get caught up with the demand for the new MacBook and MacBook Pro?
 

Swarmlord

macrumors 6502a
Sep 18, 2006
535
0
Since the PPC processor isn't being updated and the Intel chip is, it's kind of a moot point now isn't it?

I think that a comparison of AMD 64 x2 or Opteron chips to Intel would be more relevant.
 

Dunepilot

macrumors 6502a
Feb 25, 2002
880
0
UK
Since the PPC processor isn't being updated and the Intel chip is, it's kind of a moot point now isn't it?

I think that a comparison of AMD 64 x2 or Opteron chips to Intel would be more relevant.

True, but in a way the chips to be found in the Wii/PS3/Xbox360 point to why we don't now have a G5 powerbook, unfortunately.
 

jhu

macrumors 6502a
Apr 4, 2004
854
1
As pointed out earlier, Apple's had zero prior experience designing Intel-based machines, and IIRC, all of those issues were addressed on later batches of Rev. A products, so I guess that answers your question itself, no? :)

does apple even design their own hardware anymore? the mac pro even uses a standard btx motherboard.
 

jhu

macrumors 6502a
Apr 4, 2004
854
1
True, but in a way the chips to be found in the Wii/PS3/Xbox360 point to why we don't now have a G5 powerbook, unfortunately.

if by "in a way" you mean that ibm doesn't want to spend the resources making a more power-efficient powerpc chip just for apple. ibm barely even uses the ppc970, and then only in blade servers.
 

Maxx Power

Cancelled
Apr 29, 2003
861
335
definately not - they are now being built in China, which explains it all :)

Wait a minute, this is racist. White people are paying decent chinese workers a few cents an hour to desperately build a bunch of machines so someone with more money can indulge in them, and you are putting the Chinese down ?
 

MUCKYFINGERS

macrumors 6502a
Jun 7, 2005
769
15
CA
I've been rocking the house with my 1.5 year old iBook G4 and the only issue I had were some logic board problems, but that was while it was under AppleCare and everything is fine. No problems since then. Kickass laptop. ^^
 

MUCKYFINGERS

macrumors 6502a
Jun 7, 2005
769
15
CA
Wait a minute, this is racist. White people are paying decent chinese workers a few cents an hour to desperately build a bunch of machines so someone with more money can indulge in them, and you are putting the Chinese down ?

+1

I agree with you.

It's not the Chinese workers' faults... it's Apple's fault.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.