Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
From the article N3E cheaper solution with decreased performance per watt.
The article is wrong.

1695253071577.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: lazy_desi_
Apparently Apple have decided to now ad the info of number of battery cycles and manufacturer in Settings -> General -> About on the 15’s. Good or bad?
 
I don’t know how Samsung does it, but Apple’s limit frame rate sets the maximum frame rate at 60hz. It does not fix the frame rate at 60hz. Apple is still dynamically adjusting the frame rate when you use limit frame rate (or low power mode), it just does so up to a lower maximum rate.
I'm aware . Think s23 goes to 24 and 48hz

Point remains though, they shoulda used it in their "test"
 
As long as the 15 Pro Max has better battery life than my 12 Pro Max with 88% health then I’m happy. I don’t care how it compares to any other phone.

And if the battery wears out really badly then I’ll get Apple to replace it through AppleCare+

I’m not concerned at all :)
 
As long as the 15 Pro Max has better battery life than my 12 Pro Max with 88% health then I’m happy. I don’t care how it compares to any other phone.

And if the battery wears out really badly then I’ll get Apple to replace it through AppleCare+

I’m not concerned at all :)
Should be better yeah. I ain't worried bout max rly, more about its smaller brother ...
 
As long as the 15 Pro Max has better battery life than my 12 Pro Max with 88% health then I’m happy. I don’t care how it compares to any other phone.

And if the battery wears out really badly then I’ll get Apple to replace it through AppleCare+

I’m not concerned at all :)
That's like buying a Ferrari and saying 'as long as the engine is slightly more powerful than my Prius, I am happy.'
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.