I saw this too, which turned me off from it, despite Ars Technica (I think) mentioning that the Studio Display worked just fine via a USB C 2.1 cable that supports 10 GBPS. I think it all boils down to the interface using Display Port 1.4 at the end of the day. The extra throughput then allows the connections on the back of the monitor to be used for, well, higher throughput things. So it all depends upon people's use cases.I found two answers in the Q&A on Amazon that make it seem this will not be ideal. See first and last questions:
View attachment 1983712
Now the question is, who wants to test out this switch to see if it works knowing that the monitor allegedly does just fine with a USB C 2.1 10 GBPS connection, lol.
Last edited: