Take off your tinfoil hat and read the entire article.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Users Facing 'Error 53' Bricking Message After Third-Party iPhone 6 Home Button Repairs
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Take off your tinfoil hat and read the entire article.
Pretty sure their scanner is not tied to encryption. And probably the same reason that android phones are ALOT less secure.
If the OS would reject the repair right away instead of waiting for an OS update to lock up, then I would believe this is a security issue.
No need to disable the entire phone over this though. Find an unauthorized touch-id sensor is present, disable touch-id, and make it work just a button like it was in the iPhone 5. Disabling the entire device and all functionality is taking it way too far.
No, Apple is constantly being held to a higher level of scrutiny with regards to their fingerprint system. Remember how much media attention it garnered when someone figured out how to fool a 5s? Now, remember how many people even bothered to mess with any of the Android based devices fingerprint scanner? I don't recall that second question ever occurring. So Apple HAS to be spot on with their systems. Any flaws will get thrown into the spotlight so much that even your local news reporter will try to take a swing at it.
I'm confused. Aren't there non-Apple repair shops which are certified by Apple, who receive authentic Apple tools and parts and training for fixing Apple products?
Are we saying that those certified technicians can't fix it, or that uncertified technicians can't fix it, or that nobody at all, not even full blown Apple technicians, can repair it?
If it's only that uncertified technicians can't fix it, then this seems like a non-story to me. I would expect an uncertified technician to cause issues like this. Their source of replacement parts is shady - it's obviously not coming from Apple.
If it's that either of the other two groups of people (Apple certified or Apple employees) that can't fix it, then that's a real problem.
Are we saying that those certified technicians can't fix it, or that uncertified technicians can't fix it, or that nobody at all, not even full blown Apple technicians, can repair it?
If it's only that uncertified technicians can't fix it, then this seems like a non-story to me. I would expect an uncertified technician to cause issues like this. Their source of replacement parts is shady - it's obviously not coming from Apple.
If it's that either of the other two groups of people (Apple certified or Apple employees) that can't fix it, then that's a real problem.
Apple should not only repair iPhones in Apple store but also sell genuine OEM parts to 3rd parties and/or customers.
Intelligent people will understand that this is a good thing.
People complaining about Apple protecting their private data.
Dumb thinks as dumb is. ;(
Bravo, Apple. Bravo.
Dumb thinks as dumb is. ;(
Bravo, Apple. Bravo.
So, on detecting 3rd party replacement of any finger print related part they couldn't just completely disable only the finger print ID access and switch to pin only entry like every iPhone that doesn't have finger print ID? Instead of bricking the whole phone.
This will happen soon with cars as well. Mark my word.
My understanding is that apple don't allow AASP's to repair iphones/tablets etc...... The only official way to get it done is through apple who here in the UK are
a. Inconvenient
b. Expensive
I can only imagine the press if it was found out retroactively that phony Touch ID sensors had made their way into authorized (and especially unauthorized) screen supply lines that caused severe issues to the phone, reduced the accuracy of Touch ID, or exposed fingerprint data.
"Why didn't the iPhone prevent this?" "Touch ID is useless & weak" "Why doesn't Apple enforce standards" blah blah blah.
This is a big deal and iPhone handles it correctly. Perhaps you should be taking your phone to someone who stands by their repair instead of turning to Apple because your iPhone is attempting its best to protect your data in an instance that is nearly impossible to (physical access to device).
"Why didn't the iPhone prevent this?" "Touch ID is useless & weak" "Why doesn't Apple enforce standards" blah blah blah.
This is a big deal and iPhone handles it correctly. Perhaps you should be taking your phone to someone who stands by their repair instead of turning to Apple because your iPhone is attempting its best to protect your data in an instance that is nearly impossible to (physical access to device).
Sigh, when will people learn... don't buy cheap chargers and don't hire cheap dodgy garage stores to fix your tech products. Sorry but this is what you get!
Just disable all touch id within the software if it detects an unauthorised repair. Not the whole phone.
I feel for the guy, but I'm siding with Apple on this one. It's a security risk. It's a case of 'the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.' It might be inconvenient, but if you need your iPhone repaired, seek out a certified technician if you don't have Apple Care.
Then that is the responsibility of your local repair shot to ensure that the new TouchID is properly paired with your iPhone. Unfortunately, this is a case of "you get what you pay for" because Apple has the TouchID system tightened down. Honestly, it's a good thing. They are doing their best to keep your phone's data safe. If it wasn't locked down, it would be compressible and then Apple would have to answer to an avalanche of bad press regarding how they made a theoretically hack-able system.
Well if I replace the door locking system on my car, and get it done at a non-honda garage, it doesn't stop the car from being usable..... so No, you're not
This is probably a security update to keep people using false fingerprint readers to get into the phone.
See how much bad press Apple got when someone got electrocuted by a charger and it turned out it was a 3rd party Chinese knockoff? But too late, all the public hears is "Woman electrocuted by iPhone"
One Apple Pay breach could destroy the public's confidence in Apple Pay completely so I'm really not surprised they are going out of their way to ensure the risk of this is minimal whilst also keeping us users secure.
I don't know why they have to brick the phone though, why not just disable TouchID?
One Apple Pay breach could destroy the public's confidence in Apple Pay completely so I'm really not surprised they are going out of their way to ensure the risk of this is minimal whilst also keeping us users secure.
I don't know why they have to brick the phone though, why not just disable TouchID?
Well, Apple is right on this one. The only thing that might bother me is that since this is a security related part, Apple makes no difference in the cost of service. To exagarrate a bit ... 129€ part + 79€ labour for one button that costs a cent and takes a few minutes to replace. The next thing will be Touch ID in the screen, fused with half of the rest, commanding the replacement of a great part of the phone ... (Timmy must definetly be excited on this one).
Last edited:
Best read the Guardian article to find out some of the circumstances of why/how they were fixed and then disabled.