Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The reason no after market upgrades were available were clearly told by Apple. They built themselves into a thermal corner.

Xcode (and other coding environments) does the compiling for you. All Apple apps are already ready for ARM (because of iOS) and Adobe are nearly there as well.

The rest of your post are purely conjecture. Apple have the expertise and manpower to build logic boards themselves. Heck, that was how they started in a garage so many years ago.

Those folks aren't at Apple anymore.

None of my mission critical apps are on iOS - nor will they be anytime in the next decade or so. Some of us do real work - which requires a real computer, not a phone on steroids.

AFA "aftermarket upgrades". The video rom for the gpus was on the motherboard, not the card - to upgrade those meant replacing the motherboard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: barmann
You mean Candy Crush, Angry Birds and all the other apps from iOS the pros need for the new Mac Pro?

No, I wasn't the one arguing the Mac were going full ARM. Direct your question to that person.

I'm merely stating that Apple made applications are ready for ARM (if need be) and so are many of Adobe's applications.

They may do the compiling for you- that doesn't mean your code is compilable to x platform. Not a lot of apps are there yet.. And not a lot of Apps that are cross platform on Windows and Mac OS have incentive to move to ARM at all. I don't think you understand what I'm saying or this topic at all.

Also, I don't think you realize how much Apple relies on other companies- Intel is a big Apple partner... Apple will have to replace the things it loses when it axes the relationship with Intel. Just look it up.. They work closely together.

Honestly, I'm not the one saying Apple is going ARM. You are simply making it up to be a bigger problem than it would be.

It wouldn't be worse than going from PPC to Intel. There would be a transition period like the last time and before that going from Carbon to Cocoa.

The last point is just so obvious. Yes, of course, they work with other companies?! What a shocker. No one is suggesting they are ditching Intel. They are, however, not obligated to either use Intel or AMD.

Those folks aren't at Apple anymore.

None of my mission critical apps are on iOS - nor will they be anytime in the next decade or so. Some of us do real work - which requires a real computer, not a phone on steroids.

AFA "aftermarket upgrades". The video rom for the gpus was on the motherboard, not the card - to upgrade those meant replacing the motherboard.

I'm still not the one saying Apple are going ARM for the desktop but if the industry is moving to ARM so are the applications.
 
Idk- they still will let you buy Mac Pro 6,1- so they haven't protected people from making an expensive mistake... I think that means the Mac Pro 7,1 is not launching soon.. Maybe 2 years..

I can't tell if you are being serious. It is quite rare for Apple to discontinue a model before the replacement is released (unless the model/line is being cancelled), much less discontinue a model two years before its replacement. And I don't know how anyone can say with a straight face that Apple should "protect" people from overpaying for an Apple computer.
 
iOS is big in enterprise. At my company we use mostly Macs and a few servers to do work on remotely.

Define the industry.

I don't know what planet people are on when they post online. Sorry to be blunt to those people. Outside their world of Windows enterprise, IT, military, etc its a different world. Macs and iOS are completely dominant in anything media, entertainment, design, creative, journalism. A small smattering of PCs will be in those places. Same in wealthier cities. Go to any cafe. You see mostly customers have Apple. Outside cities then its obviously cheap PCs because they have less money. Stating obvious things doh
[doublepost=1559503748][/doublepost]
He means- DIY Motherboards! *Hopes*

If you sell a motherboard then you have to sell a case because brand visibility is important. So really that means bare bones system. But if you offer bare bones system then there are two choices. You offer upgrades or you tell PC/Hackintosh guys to 'Bring Your Own Components'. They take the CPU, ram, GPU, drives from their existing system and stick it in the bare bones Mac Pro.

This can be done if macOS only works on an Apple motherboard with T series SMC. It would have to be unpatchable unhackable OS. Then all those Hackintosh guys would say OK I'll buy the bare bones Mac Pro and put my components in there.
 
iOS is big in enterprise. At my company we use mostly Macs and a few servers to do work on remotely.

Define the industry.

Which is it, Macs or iOS ? You are actually confusing the two, aren't you ?
[doublepost=1559505186][/doublepost]
I don't know what planet people are on when they post online. Sorry to be blunt to those people. Outside their world of Windows enterprise, IT, military, etc its a different world. Macs and iOS are completely dominant in anything media, entertainment, design, creative, journalism.


Again, Macs and iOS and its devices are two very different things .
Macs - Apple computers running OSX - are no longer domininant in any of the fields you mention, and in most setups of significant size they feed into an array of servers/workstations which are running Windows or Linux .
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssgbryan and Nugget
Here, some porn to release the tension :D
Shows clearly that it’s about time to retire the cMP: A 2018 mini i7 destroys that upgraded cMP in single core (5666 vs 2993) and is close in multi-core (24315 vs 26317) - with a fraction of footprint and energy consumption.

So it rather raised the tension - but thanks for trying ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: askunk
People, if any Mac was going ARM this year, Guilherme Rambo and Steven Troughton-Smith would already have found the code to support it in the macOS 10.15 betas.

And before people respond with "but Apple would not have yet released a version with that code outside of their labs until WWDC", yeah... This is the Apple that is themselves responsible for some of the biggest leaks over the last two years due to not properly policing their public-facing code that those two gentlemen have sussed-out.

IMO, the first Mac to go ARM will be the MacBook. The MacBook Air is on the 7W Amber Lake and there is a 5W version that would work in the MacBook, so there is no reason for Apple to not have updated it yet on those grounds. There is also no reason to wait until WWDC to announce a case redesign because the only change would be adding a second USB-C port (or replacing the existing USB-C port with a TB3/USB-C port).

And as to that ARM MacBook, IMO we won't hear about that until macOS 10.16 at the earliest and I think even then it would depend on how quickly "Marzipan" macOS applications appear once 10.15 is in general release.
 
Yes, according to their self imposed timeframe. However, it’s been more than a year since we heard something about the mac pro. In april 2018 all they said was that it will be a 2019 product, and a year before that Schiller said that it will be a modular product.

I think it’s about time we knew what Schiller means by modular.


 
People, if any Mac was going ARM this year, Guilherme Rambo and Steven Troughton-Smith would already have found the code to support it in the macOS 10.15 betas.

And before people respond with "but Apple would not have yet released a version with that code outside of their labs until WWDC", yeah... This is the Apple that is themselves responsible for some of the biggest leaks over the last two years due to not properly policing their public-facing code that those two gentlemen have sussed-out.

IMO, the first Mac to go ARM will be the MacBook. New Intel CPUs for that model are already in the MacBook Air, so there is no reason for Apple to not have updated it yet on those grounds. There is also no reason to wait until WWDC to announce a case redesign because the only change would be adding a second USB-C port (or replacing the existing USB-C port with a TB3/USB-C port).

And as to that ARM MacBook, IMO we won't hear about that until macOS 10.16 at the earliest and I think even then it would depend on how quickly "Marzipan" macOS applications appear once 10.15 is in general release.


Ya I can see Apple doing 11.0 for ARM Macbooks etc.
 
Again, Macs and iOS and its devices are two very different things .
Macs - Apple computers running OSX - are no longer domininant in any of the fields you mention, .


You have replied to a 50 years old professional who posted an expert opinion of 30 years experience not some random 18 years old person in a forum. I'm traveling between Paris, New York, London, Hamburg, Berlin every month. In front of my eyes I see 95% percent Macs used by the clients and partners. From 100 to 1500 employees depending on business we consult. In the sectors I mentioned. I know we are anonymous on these forum things and you can't see the professional experience of members but please don't belittle.

These huge companies will not move to a PC. In these sectors. Impossible. They are deeply entrenched with what macOS offers that Windows cannot offer. For them usability is extremely important and that comes with things like Finder Labels (massively important, without it all these companies will be crippled), QuickLook (huge time saver) etc

I said they have a smattering of PCs. They are used for some CG, the IT backends, some cross platform work, etc. But it is no more than 5%.

iPads are more widely used than PCs in fact. In these sectors I mention. They use it for many tasks, including IT management.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zarniwoop
Do we have code evidence Apple was going Intel before Apple announced?

No, but I do recall we knew Apple had OS X on Intel in the lab because it was clear PowerPC was not going to be able to compete long-term.

And Apple back then was much better at keeping secrets than Apple today (for a variety of reasons) so it's not really a fair analogy to compare the two eras.
 
No, but I do recall we knew Apple had OS X on Intel in the lab because it was clear PowerPC was not going to be able to compete long-term.

And Apple back then was much better at keeping secrets than Apple today (for a variety of reasons) so it's not really a fair analogy to compare the two eras.
NeXT ran on Intel - that support was never dropped, but not explicitly exposed.
 
Thats untrue- they'd take down Macs in the past before the new ones release... in the 90s and such

If 25 year old release history is relevant then sure, why not a bare motherboard because Apple did that in 1976. I'm going to brush up on release patterns under John Sculley to gain insights in the new Mac Pro.
 
Phil: You know what I’m gonna troll all those bitter dwellers on MacRumors.com.
Craig: Yeah, lets hold a fireside chat with a few bloggers and see what kind of response we get...
Phil: We can even give them that “thermal corner” line.
Craig: If it gains traction we can do another one a year later and then say it’s not a ‘2018’ product, and see how many we still have hanging on every word.
Phil: Then wait until WWDC and pull out ‘can’t troll anymore my ass’-that’ll show ‘em.

*apple senior management coffee meeting sometime in late 2016/early 2017
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.