Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Folks complaining about the price really need to peruse HP and Dell's pages - lower-spec hardware for thousands more at the low-end and at the upper end, you are paying $6000 just for the CPU or video card.

Or buy from Velocity Micro and get a 16 core, 128Gb ram boxen for around $4,700.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flint Ironstag
8-core Xeon, 32GB memory, Radeon Pro 580X, 256GB SSD. Starts at $5,999

Jesus christ, that's incredibly expensive for that spec.
Apple knows most people will purchase that base configuration and DIY upgrade it, let's see what tricked GPU lock includes, BTW at least this time apple heared user's complaints.
 
I am so dang happy right now! My only critique is the lack of NVIDIA support, but they seem to have some great alternatives. Hope that comes later, but at least they delivered in EVERY OTHER WAY! So great!

Oh, but that base price is asinine... At least it's user-upgradable though!
 
An HP Z4 will run you over a grand more and can't match the Mac Pro's specs.

I'm having trouble finding the prices that show that it's over a grand more. It's seems to be less.

They shouldn't offer such a terrible starting spec. It can be outperformed by any new iMac for half the price (excluding the afterburner card)
[doublepost=1559588769][/doublepost]
Apple knows most people will purchase that base configuration and DIY upgrade it.

Ahh, that is a good point. Will still have to get CPU through apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flint Ironstag
I feel that at $5999 it should at the very least match the spec of the base iMac Pro. So 1TB SSD, and equivalent GPU.

Completely agree. And the iMac Pro is giving you an included 5K display as well. It won't be shipping until Fall, so hopefully either (1) it becomes clear that the value is worthwhile due to other features/functions, and/or (2) they adjust the price or config after gauging potential buyer feedback.
 
I'm having trouble finding the prices that show that it's over a grand more. It's seems to be less.

They shouldn't offer such a terrible starting spec. It can be outperformed by any new iMac for half the price (excluding the afterburner card)
[doublepost=1559588769][/doublepost]

Ahh, that is a good point. Will still have to get CPU through apple.
iMacs have outperformed Pro Macs for years at this point. If you don’t see the point of what you’re getting for the extra money, you’re not the target market.

Given all the people complaining about price and saying it’s overpriced, I’d say that’s most of the people in this thread :)
 
Apple knows most people will purchase that base configuration and DIY upgrade it, let's see what tricked GPU lock includes, BTW at least this time apple heared user's complaints.

I got the impression the most common argument was DIY upgrades by pro users were rare ?
Still got to figure out what options there are for RAM and storage , proprietary or not .

It'd help if Apple could figure how to do a stream that can be paused and rewound .

The entry price is off either way, they still try to sell iMac Pros as a viable alternative it seems .

And my god, is that thing ugly .
 
I am so dang happy right now! My only critique is the lack of NVIDIA support, but they seem to have some great alternatives. Hope that comes later, but at least they delivered in EVERY OTHER WAY! So great!

Oh, but that base price is asinine... At least it's user-upgradable though!
At least you have your mind intact now.:)
But these prices...
[doublepost=1559589495][/doublepost]Dec, where are you?
MacPro @ WWDC!!!
 
the important questions:
how about internal storage?
will macos support nvidia gpus again?
how much are 12,16,24,28 core machines?

the only secure thing right now:
you pay at least double compared to a windows pc.
 
iMacs have outperformed Pro Macs for years at this point. If you don’t see the point of what you’re getting for the extra money, you’re not the target market.

Given all the people complaining about price and saying it’s overpriced, I’d say that’s most of the people in this thread :)
Why would you say that?
 
iMacs have outperformed Pro Macs for years at this point. If you don’t see the point of what you’re getting for the extra money, you’re not the target market.

Given all the people complaining about price and saying it’s overpriced, I’d say that’s most of the people in this thread :)

It's easy to be dismissive about not being the target market, but it's not true. The iMacs have outperformed because the pro Macs are out of date, that's why we've been waiting for years. The base spec is anaemic. I'd expect it is going to be at least $8k to get to a reasonable spec.
 
I feel that at $5999 it should at the very least match the spec of the base iMac Pro. So 1TB SSD, and equivalent GPU.

Well you are paying for the R&D and production costs that went into it and the W 3000 Xeons in the Mac Pro are going to be more expensive at similar core counts to the W 2000 Xeons in the iMac Pro. The Skylake 28-core Xeon is $2999 and I expect the Mac Pro will be using the newer Cascade Lake models scheduled for shipment later this year.


And yes, on the surface $1000 for a stand sounds insane, but it's a pretty impressive stand and hell, Sony looks to be asking a couple hundred for a basic plastic stand with no height-adjustment or rotation capability (and not sure even tilt) for their $43,000 reference monitor. :p
 
It's easy to be dismissive about not being the target market, but it's not true. The iMacs have outperformed because the pro Macs are out of date, that's why we've been waiting for years. The base spec is anaemic. I'd expect it is going to be at least $8k to get to a reasonable spec.
No, I mean you get faster performance for less with i7 and i9 processors, but those are only options if you don’t care about sustained workloads, ECC RAM, expandability, and thermals in the Mac’s case.

Xeon workstations are expensive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silencio
iMacs have outperformed Pro Macs for years at this point. If you don’t see the point of what you’re getting for the extra money, you’re not the target market.

Given all the people complaining about price and saying it’s overpriced, I’d say that’s most of the people in this thread :)

All four previous Mac Pro generations/revisions (2006, 2008, 2009/10/12, 2013) have been in the $2000-3000 range, and were plenty powerful at the time of their introduction. This is TWICE the high end of that range, w/ no apparent option to get down below $5999 (remember the 2006 could be down-configured w/ 2.0GHz for $2200 or something close to that). People wanting or needing an expandable and configurable system needn't be labeled "not in the target market" just because they are having a hard time accepting the "extra money" being twice what all previous iterations have commanded...
 
Trashcan ][

Cascade lake Xeon upto 28 cores

Single GPU (vega 48, vega 64, mi50, mi60 (vega 20)

6 RAM slots

Dual SSD PCIe x4

6 USB 4
4 USB 3.2
1 HDMI
Dual 10G lan

600W thermal core 2

~ 1 inch taller
That's all, today thus Thread is officially dead, please someone start "waiting for Mac pro 8,1"
Close the darkest you say, can you share the onion address PM ?
 
So in summary, for 3D immersive workspace generation & VR, it's going to be a laughingstock compared to a midrange PC with an RTX2080TI in it.

*facepalm*
 
So its clear not expensive..only that 8C Xeon on the market is 990$
The thermals are around 300$
SSD with 5Gbs read and 4.5 Gb write i think isnt cheap, the fastes ssd ever
 
Take a close look at the video cards.

Proprietary connector to power anything over 75 watts.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.