I dare bet all them modules are locked down with t2 secruity of some sort as well, so no adding your own DIY upgrades later.
Oddly short introduction of the MP.
Folks complaining about the price really need to peruse HP and Dell's pages - lower-spec hardware for thousands more at the low-end and at the upper end, you are paying $6000 just for the CPU or video card.
Apple knows most people will purchase that base configuration and DIY upgrade it, let's see what tricked GPU lock includes, BTW at least this time apple heared user's complaints.8-core Xeon, 32GB memory, Radeon Pro 580X, 256GB SSD. Starts at $5,999
Jesus christ, that's incredibly expensive for that spec.
An HP Z4 will run you over a grand more and can't match the Mac Pro's specs.
Apple knows most people will purchase that base configuration and DIY upgrade it.
I feel that at $5999 it should at the very least match the spec of the base iMac Pro. So 1TB SSD, and equivalent GPU.
iMacs have outperformed Pro Macs for years at this point. If you don’t see the point of what you’re getting for the extra money, you’re not the target market.I'm having trouble finding the prices that show that it's over a grand more. It's seems to be less.
They shouldn't offer such a terrible starting spec. It can be outperformed by any new iMac for half the price (excluding the afterburner card)
[doublepost=1559588769][/doublepost]
Ahh, that is a good point. Will still have to get CPU through apple.
Apple knows most people will purchase that base configuration and DIY upgrade it, let's see what tricked GPU lock includes, BTW at least this time apple heared user's complaints.
At least you have your mind intact now.I am so dang happy right now! My only critique is the lack of NVIDIA support, but they seem to have some great alternatives. Hope that comes later, but at least they delivered in EVERY OTHER WAY! So great!
Oh, but that base price is asinine... At least it's user-upgradable though!
Why would you say that?iMacs have outperformed Pro Macs for years at this point. If you don’t see the point of what you’re getting for the extra money, you’re not the target market.
Given all the people complaining about price and saying it’s overpriced, I’d say that’s most of the people in this thread![]()
iMacs have outperformed Pro Macs for years at this point. If you don’t see the point of what you’re getting for the extra money, you’re not the target market.
Given all the people complaining about price and saying it’s overpriced, I’d say that’s most of the people in this thread![]()
I feel that at $5999 it should at the very least match the spec of the base iMac Pro. So 1TB SSD, and equivalent GPU.
Mac Pro link now resolves to the new pagehttps://www.apple.com/mac/
Its added to the top menu now, but still redirected to old Mac Pro page, so, lets see in a minute
Display is already added: https://www.apple.com/pro-display-xdr/
No, I mean you get faster performance for less with i7 and i9 processors, but those are only options if you don’t care about sustained workloads, ECC RAM, expandability, and thermals in the Mac’s case.It's easy to be dismissive about not being the target market, but it's not true. The iMacs have outperformed because the pro Macs are out of date, that's why we've been waiting for years. The base spec is anaemic. I'd expect it is going to be at least $8k to get to a reasonable spec.
iMacs have outperformed Pro Macs for years at this point. If you don’t see the point of what you’re getting for the extra money, you’re not the target market.
Given all the people complaining about price and saying it’s overpriced, I’d say that’s most of the people in this thread![]()
Close the darkest you say, can you share the onion address PM ?Trashcan ][
Cascade lake Xeon upto 28 cores
Single GPU (vega 48, vega 64, mi50, mi60 (vega 20)
6 RAM slots
Dual SSD PCIe x4
6 USB 4
4 USB 3.2
1 HDMI
Dual 10G lan
600W thermal core 2
~ 1 inch taller
That's all, today thus Thread is officially dead, please someone start "waiting for Mac pro 8,1"