Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
  1. the MacPro 2013 was announced at WWDC June 2013, released december 19,2013 (announced 1 day prior to release on the 18th)
  2. the iMacPro 2017 was announced at WWDC June 2017, released december 14th 2017 (announced two days prior to release on the 12th)
  3. the MacPro 2019 was announced at WWDC June 2019, released ??

I think there is a pattern here, just not sure what it is? :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: OkiRun and Chung123
Tea leaf readings and speculation. Some are "citing" this article too. Until the release BTO pricing and take orders for actual deliveries, it really means nothing.

I absolutely don't believe in the unveil of this macbook this year! I think they'll keep this one for WWDC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OkiRun
TBH, the Mac Pro would likely be a better candidate for PCIe 4 at the moment because of the accessible slots. With everything built in, and GPUs getting practically nothing out of PCIe 4 so far, it’d be only for the SSD, assuming Apple remembers to update their T2 chip to support it.

Threadripper would be useful for other reasons, but if Apple hasn’t reached the end of their rope with Intel yet, it doesn’t seem likely. Especially with Intel willing to produce what amounts to custom SKUs for devices like the Mac Mini.
apple needs to move the T2 to cpu PCI-e not stacked off the PCH. Even more so if they want storage there
 
Has it changed from fall?
 

Attachments

  • 45EC257D-C1D1-4055-AA1B-1AB16F3BA51C.png
    45EC257D-C1D1-4055-AA1B-1AB16F3BA51C.png
    916.9 KB · Views: 87
Looks like 16” MacBook Pro is tomorrow. So we’re probably looking at today or tomorrow.
 
Can we make it to 600 pages before release? Mac Mini ain't got nothing on the 10 year wait for a real successor to the 2009 Mac Pro even if it does cost $6,000.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.