Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
On the plus side, I've noticed Mojave is noticeably smoother and faster on my mid 2012 MBP

Apparently the sub pixel anti-aliasing was taxing for the GPU's

Who doesn't have a retina Mac at this point? Everyone must, and if you don't really you must upgrade now. There's no excuse.

Who doesn't have one?? Do you have any idea how popular the MacBook Air has been? More MacBook Air's are out there in the wild than the retina MacBook line up. No one "must" have a retina MacBook.

Besides, some people prefer the battery life of the Airs...no retina Apple laptop to date has matched the Air battery life.
 
Yeah, the fonts together with dark mode look pretty bad. Downgraded for now.

OT: When you boot your Mac does the screen go black for 1-2 seconds when approximately half way through the Apple logo progress bar?
 
Your 2017 iMac has a Retina display. Every iMac since 2014 has Retina.
There is still a bottomline non-4K 21.5" iMac for sale, up to now (2017 model)
And then the MBA despite likely being replaced next month, is also non-retina.

Regardless, this is moot because external screens doesn't need to be HiDPI, including expensive professional ones. Look at those Eizo ColorEdge that costs more than an iMac Pro, some are still 2K or even FHD.
 
Your 2017 iMac has a Retina display. Every iMac since 2014 has Retina.


Not if your budget is unforgiving.

https://everymac.com/systems/apple/imac/specs/imac-core-i5-2.3-21-inch-aluminum-mid-2017-specs.html

Screen Shot 87.png

The basemodel macbook air looks to be slightly cheaper.
 
Yeah I noticed it on my non-Retina, don't really care all that much to be honest.

Here's an excuse: I need a Pro laptop that's actually a Pro laptop, not some glued together POS I can't even run twin HDD's in

So when you are saying you need a Pro laptop you don't mean Mac do you?
 
In the General Control Panel, is

"use font smoothing when available" checked or unchecked?
 
I'm using 10.14.1 on my Late 2013 iMac non-retina. Why did Apple remove subpixel anti-aliasing? Why didn't they just leave it alone and include it as an option for those with non-retina screens. Makes no sense at all.

Because subpixel antialiasing is an ugly (albeit smart) hack that is expensive to implement, doesn’t play well with compositing window managers and is completely unnecessary in the age of HiDPI monitors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: osx86
On the plus side, I've noticed Mojave is noticeably smoother and faster on my mid 2012 MBP

Apparently the sub pixel anti-aliasing was taxing for the GPU's
My late 2013 with dedicated GPU is running a lot cooler.
 
It's been years now that macOS font rendering has been **** on non-HiDpi displays, subpixel rendering or not. Apple does not give any other choice than to use a HiDpi display for proper font rendering. To be honest, the situation is not much better on Windows 10 (although it still has subpixel rendering). So throw away all your 1080p or 1200p dispays and use 4K screens...
 
Who doesn't have a retina Mac at this point? Everyone must, and if you don't really you must upgrade now. There's no excuse.

Trust me, I’d love a 2018 15” i9 with 1TB SSD and 32GB RAM to replace my current 15” 2012, which is beginning to struggle on LPX and is pretty much unusable for smooth playback on FCPX with multiple layers.

I really would love one to use for the next 6 years. It’d make my workflow a lot smoother. Unfortunately I don’t have £4500 to sink on a goddamn laptop. My one was £1250 when I first bought it directly from Apple, which included free AppleCare at the time, plus add maybe £400 for the upgrades during its life. That’s still far less than half of what I’d need to pay now.

I can justify £2000 on a futureproofed laptop. I can’t justify or afford £4500. It’s such a colossal jump.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.