Ah. Fascinating. Absolutely fascinating. You must tell me what you think of it, and I shall be very interested to read your thoughts - and, more to the point, whether you recommend it as worth reading or not.
Actually, I love reading about Roman history - specifically the two hundred years (roughly 100 BCE [the old BC] -100 CE [the old AD]), the years spanning the apex (and collapse of the Republic) and the first century - roughly - of the emerging Empire. The year of the Four Emperors is extraordinarily interesting.
I shall. I've gone through the introduction so far, only 10 pages (remember, I'm not a speed reader). It seems like the author is building this book on the foundations of a couple of older books, you probably know one of them, 'Histories'. As well as with his own research.
It's about 300 pages of fine print, so my eyes will tire more easily, but I'll get through it and post about it.
You had asked me to post about that Aztec book earlier this year and I finished it and posted about it here while you were away in Bosnia. I'm not sure if you saw it or not.