I have the Topping D10s DAC (USB) which I currently use daily with my 2011 iMac. I have tested it successfully with my Cube too. 👍
I haven't had time to put SSD in my DLSD, but MorphOS is the next step.
I have the Topping D10s DAC (USB) which I currently use daily with my 2011 iMac. I have tested it successfully with my Cube too. 👍
I have the Topping D10s DAC (USB) which I currently use daily with my 2011 iMac. I have tested it successfully with my Cube too. 👍
I think no. And it's not open source.
On x86_64 the GUI app is fixed now. Will try on powerpc today (possibly it will, since yesterday it was launching, but crashing; hopefully I have fixed the bug now).
View attachment 2521578
That’s exactly why I wrote “If they open-source the older code”.
Odd question but would you (or anyone) happen to know of a good cheap DAC or audio card for a pcie G5?PM G4 1.25DP MDD FW800:
I installed an USB 2.0 card, a Soundblaster Audigy 2 and an exit fan. Happy to report that the USB card works, at least Soundblasters Firewire seems to pass music through (didn't have analog connection speakers to test so I tested with the Lacie FW-speakers) and the exit fan doesn't seem make the machine any louder IMO.
View attachment 2521391
Odd question but would you (or anyone) happen to know of a good cheap DAC or audio card for a pcie G5?
Yes, but the PM optical might be limited to 96KHz while USB usually supports higher sampling rates (192 or even 384KHz). Can you hear it? Maybe, it depends...but on principle if one has the optical and USB to choose from I choose USB for better potential quality. To take full advantage of this one would need high res source material though.BTW, the easiest way to isolate the DAC from the computer is to use optical connection – conveniently, PowerMac has an optical out. Just get a decent toslink cable.
Yes, but the PM optical might be limited to 96KHz while USB usually supports higher sampling rates (192 or even 384KHz). Can you hear it? Maybe, it depends...but on principle if one has the optical and USB to choose from I choose USB for better potential quality. To take full advantage of this one would need high res source material though.
Yes, but the PM optical might be limited to 96KHz while USB usually supports higher sampling rates (192 or even 384KHz).
Can you hear it? Maybe, it depends...but on principle if one has the optical and USB to choose from I choose USB for better potential quality. To take full advantage of this one would need high res source material though.
Well, many services where you can buy high res music offer 24bit 192KHz files. And if one buys such material then DAC or connection limited to 96KHz might not be ideal.To begin with, files are still typically 48 or 96KHz at best, and everything not too recent is redbook. So I don’t think this is too practical. (It is also not necessarily true that “the more the better” given hardware.)
Yes, usually they do. Some are USB only though, like my Topping D10s and the Audioquest mentioned above. And some do not have USB at all.Normally DACs have multiple input choices. Quality will depend on numerous factors, including the specific implementation of a given interface, power isolation etc.
Abstractly I would go for FireWire for quality. And then it depends.
I do use USB, but never directly to the DAC. It is always computer over USB with separated power to DDC, from there ST optical to the DAC.
Idk why the hell I said cheap when I dropped money on a new GPU. So I will try again.This is a very imprecise query. What is “good” and what is “cheap”? What requirements are there besides these two? (Inputs/outputs etc.)
I have/had a lot of DACs and DDCs. Perhaps of cheap ones I was very happy with “Breeze Audio” (essentially, a Chinese no-name from eBay seller) based on dual AK4399 chips (it was years ago, back then this was about their top of the line; schematics was likely copied from some Western brand). Eventually I came to a conclusion that going for a cheap DAC is not saving money over time, since there is always a desire to try something new and a bit better LOL
If you can spot a used Chord 2Qute at a decent price, that is a fantastic DAC. Hardly “cheap”, but you won’t regret. Depending on your geography, TEAC and CEC should be nice.
I would advise against anything installed inside the computer for high quality audio. DAC should be external, preferably on an isolated power source. BTW, the easiest way to isolate the DAC from the computer is to use optical connection – conveniently, PowerMac has an optical out. Just get a decent toslink cable.
Well, many services where you can buy high res music offer 24bit 192KHz files. And if one buys such material then DAC or connection limited to 96KHz might not be ideal.
I spot DSD/DXD in your pile so... did you buy that for them redbooks?![]()
And then I'll see if it will run my old iTunes library and maybe some other music apps satisfactorily (I'll expect it does) and I will use one of my DACs with it and the output will be trough my stereo set.
If that doesn't count, I attempted to install Tigerbrew on Sorbet, but failed to because the version of Xcode I downloaded doesn't seem to work. I'll be troubleshooting later.
If not, what are some alternative FireWire interfaces (such as the Apogee Duet)?
My iTunes library is still in the old format ie. separate files so I don't have to use iTunes if better options exist. Haven't investigated the options yet. Any suggestions where to start?It should, I believe.
We got a lot of options for music apps now on powerpc.
My iTunes library is still in the old format ie. separate files so I don't have to use iTunes if better options exist. Haven't investigated the options yet. Any suggestions where to start?
To what machine? The DLSD?Replacing the 20y old PRAM battery. I need to change the connector. Damn.![]()
To what machine? The DLSD?
Is the old one how they came from factory or an aftermarket replacement too? Looks very much like something Apple would not install originally. I would be expecting something resembling coin cell batteries.