I don’t think SL was ever available via Internet Recovery. The 2010 MBA came with a nifty lil’ USB drive.I agree: because that's exactly what happened when I set up my 2010 MBA. Internet Recovery offered me Lion instead of Snow Leopard.
I don’t think SL was ever available via Internet Recovery. The 2010 MBA came with a nifty lil’ USB drive.I agree: because that's exactly what happened when I set up my 2010 MBA. Internet Recovery offered me Lion instead of Snow Leopard.
I don’t think SL was ever available via Internet Recovery.
The 2010 MBA came with a nifty lil’ USB drive.
Odd. My freshly installed 10.6 on my 06 mini youtube works fine in both. Try setting a mobile user agent string for youtube.com. If that doesn't do it grab tensixtube from the garden. If that doesn't work there is an odd underlying cause in your machine.ArcticFox and InterWeb both don't seem to want to play any videos.
i got a similar error telling me that my disk is almost full on my macpro4,1 running ventura the other day, even though i had about 70GB free on boot. i havent seen the error since though, even though i have less space free nowThis week I got myself a late 2011, 17-inch i7 MacBook Pro with SSD. Dual-boot for Snow Leopard and High Sierra, which is awesome. This is about as good as it gets for a portable, IMO.
I upgraded the Ram from 4GB to 16GB, but this caused something weird to happen. Now whenever I boot into Snow Leopard, it warns me that my boot disk is almost full, even though it's not. I checked "don't remind me" but it shows up every time I boot. What gives?
Inspired by @VirtuallyInsane I decided to pull out an old MacBook Pro 2,1 out of storage and toy around with it a bit. Much to my surprise, upon boot, it just sat there on a black screen, doing nothing.
Long story short, I've discovered that this particular Mac's RAM slots are unusually finicky, and the retention clips for the DIMM slots, while they look totally normal, make it oddly easy for one to improperly install RAM by accident.
Now my next challenge is getting YouTube working on this. The latest versions of both ArcticFox and InterWeb both don't seem to want to play any videos.
i have q9100 and 16gb ram in an old dell precision m6400 laptop. i had snow leopard on it for a while, makes a pretty cool hackintoshI guess there's only one way to find out... All I get is conflicting information about the QX9300 working in a iMac8,1, that's one of the big interrogations I have about this machine, next month hopefully, I'll be able to prove if it's possible or not. If it proves not to work, I think I got a laptop somewhere that takes socket P chips and could use a QX9300... Not a big deal.
GPU-wise I think it has a Radeon 2600XT, I would like to replace it down the line with either a 8800GS or a GT130 from a 2009 iMac, assuming it's possible in the first place? Slot-wise I'm sure it'd be a 1:1 fit, but what I'm worried is that Apple may probably have put some software locks in place to prevent that... Knowing myself, once I get that "curiosity itch" it's hard for me to resist the urge to test things out and find out.
EDIT: Regardless, here's the thread that I saw and briefly mentioned the QX9300: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/can-you-upgrade-the-cpu-in-an-aluminum-imac-early-2008.885917/
...I guess I'll try and document my efforts on a thread to fill in the blanks... But at the same time, given how expensive QX9300s are (I found a seller in Germany asking ~119€ shipping included for one of these), I'm having second thoughts, but at the same time, as I stated previously, I may have a laptop that supports QX9300s so it wouldn't be bought in vain.
Odd. My freshly installed 10.6 on my 06 mini youtube works fine in both. Try setting a mobile user agent string for youtube.com. If that doesn't do it grab tensixtube from the garden. If that doesn't work there is an odd underlying cause in your machine.
They're nice machines, really aesthetic too. I love using mine as a silent Snow Leopard box with SSD. It's nice to know it's there if I need a spare computer.Bought a late 2009 Mac mini for a couple of tenners. The guy put it up online just 5 minutes before I checked and within 10 minutes we made a dealNow I'll just have to wait till it arrives since he lived just a little too far to cycle to.
I don't know exactly what I'll do with it yet, but I think I'm going to messing around with Snow Leopard again. Or just put Mojave or Catalina on it and use it as a spare computer for another room.
I don't know exactly what I'll do with it yet, but I think I'm going to messing around with Snow Leopard again. Or just put Mojave or Catalina on it and use it as a spare computer for another room.
What size screen is it? Looks like either a 4:3 or 5:4 panel to me.
So, I ended up not getting the Early 2009 Macbook 13 inch, and I got an Early 2008 13 inch instead, and so far, I prefer the iBook over it. Yes, the specs are alright, but it's stuck on Lion. (Yeah, I did get it pretty cheap but still, I paid less for it than I did for the iBook).
I guess that I need a bit more time with this to determine for sure if it's good. I am just tinkering around on it tonight and trying it out, and it's fine for doing light stuff on. I'm trying out Lion also for the first time, and I prefer SL to it. It feels more responsive and has less crap on it. Less things to search, more simple.
You can run Mountain Lion on it with NPF, not sure how much faster/slower it would be.but it's stuck on Lion.
Nice to know that they're silent.They're nice machines, really aesthetic too. I love using mine as a silent Snow Leopard box with SSD. It's nice to know it's there if I need a spare computer.
IME there’s little, if any difference in performance and any Mac that runs Lion can unofficially run ML. So I’d always go for that. (Disclaimer: I don’t like Lion.)You can run Mountain Lion on it with NPF, not sure how much faster/slower it would be.
Lion's not so bad. I actually like it, and run it on a few devices. If you don't need the legacy powerpc software that'll run in snow leopard, lion gives you much better browser support and a better development environment.
Chromium Legacy: Current chrome back ported and updated quite often. Good for those "chrome only" sites.
Pale Moon: Just reinstated Mac support. Great general use browser.
I keep saying this a lot lately: If you don't like Lion but still want better web browser support, put Linux on your MacBook (either via dual-booting or as the sole OS). IMHO the biggest difference between the 2008 MacBooks and 2006-7 MacBooks is the presence of a 64-bit EFI, making installing most modern distros very easy. For something lean and mean, Zorin OS 16.2 Lite is my favorite, but Xubuntu, and Lubuntu are also good too. (One of these days I'd like to also try Peppermint or mxLinux on one of my 2008 MacBooks.)
With the RAM maxed out, an SSD and a working battery, this generation of MacBooks can still work very, very well for most general web tasks. I tried daily driving such a setup for a few months, and I was very pleased with the experience. Even Zoom video chats worked on a 2.4 Ghz machine.
If you don't want to go down that route, Chromium Legacy, Pale Moon and @wicknix's own InterWeb are great browsers for general use on Lion.
You can run Mountain Lion on it with NPF, not sure how much faster/slower it would be.